| Literature DB >> 24494185 |
Fayaz Ahmed Zargar1, Sunil Kumar2, Zuhaib Fayaz Bhat2, Pavan Kumar3.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels of pumpkin on the quality characteristics of chicken sausages. The pumpkin was incorporated at three different levels viz. 6, 12 and 18 percent replacing lean meat in the formulation. The products were analyzed for various physicochemical and sensory attributes. pH, emulsion stability, cooking yield, crude protein, ether extract and ash content of the products showed significantly (p < 0.05) decreasing trend with increasing levels of incorporation of pumpkin however, there was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the moisture and crude fibre content. Based on various parameters, 12 percent level of incorporation was optimized as best. Chicken sausages with optimum level of pumpkin along with control were aerobically packaged in LDPE pouches and assessed for storage quality under refrigerated (4 ± 1°C) conditions. The mean values of pH and all the sensory parameters showed significantly (p < 0.05) decreasing trend for both control as well as treatment samples whereas TBARS (mg malonaldehyde/kg) value, total plate count (log cfu/g) and yeast and mould count (log cfu/g) showed significantly (p < 0.05) increasing trend with storage. Coliforms (log cfu/g) were not detected throughout the period of storage. Thus, fibre enriched chicken sausages could be successfully stored for a period of 14 days at refrigeration temperature (4 ± 1°C) without any significant loss in quality.Entities:
Keywords: Chicken sausages; Crude fibre; Pumpkin; Refrigerated storage
Year: 2014 PMID: 24494185 PMCID: PMC3907634 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-39
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
The standardized formulation for the preparation of emulsion for chicken sausages
| Lean meat | 64.45% |
| Added water | 10% |
| Vegetable oil | 10% |
| Condiment mixture | 5% |
| Refined wheat flour | 3% |
| Whole egg liquid | 3% |
| Spice mixture | 2% |
| Table salt | 1.75% |
| Monosodium glutamate | 0.5%, |
| Sodium tripolyphosphate | 0.3% |
| Sodium nitrite | 120 ppm |
Effect of pumpkin on pH, cooking yield, emulsion stability and proximate composition of chicken sausages (Mean ± SE)
| Parameters | Levels of pumpkin (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | |
| pH | 6.38 | 6.30 | 6.25 | 6.12 |
| Cooking Yield (%) | 92.63 | 92.13 | 91.20 | 89.94 |
| Emulsion Stability (%) | 91.96 | 91.86 | 89.89 | 89.00a ± 0.25 |
| Moisture (%) | 63.11 | 66.02 | 66.82 | 67.63 |
| Crude Protein%) | 16.85 | 16.55 | 16.14 | 15.81 |
| Ether Extract (%) | 13.78 | 13.83 | 13.56 | 13.23 |
| Crude Fibre (%) | 0.72 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 1.81 |
| Ash (%) | 2.81 | 2.71 | 2.54 | 2.36 |
*Mean ± SE with different superscripts in a row differs significantly (P < 0.05), n = 6.
Effect of pumpkin on sensory attributes of chicken sausages (Mean ± SE)
| Sensory attributes | Levels of pumpkin (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | |
| Appearance & colour | 6.90 ± 0.11 | 7.04 ± 0.03 | 6.95 ± 0.12 | 6.80 ± 0.13 |
| Flavour | 7.04 ± 0.03 | 7.19 ± 0.10 | 7.28 ± 0.08 | 7.11 ± 0.13 |
| Juiciness | 6.90 | 6.97 | 7.02 | 7.28 |
| Texture | 7.23 | 7.19 | 7.35 | 6.33 |
| Overall acceptability | 6.47 | 6.88 | 7.40 | 6.52 |
*Mean ± SE with different superscripts in a row differs significantly (p < 0.05). Mean values are scores on 8 point descriptive scale where 1- extremely poor and 8- extremely desirable.
Effect of refrigerated storage on pH, thiobarbituric acid reacting substances (TBARS) value and free fatty acid (FFA) value of aerobically packaged cooked chicken sausages (Mean ± SE)
| Treatments | Storage period (Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 6.31 ± 0.06c | 6.26 ± 0.03bc | 6.19 ± 0.01ab | 6.10 ± 0.02a |
|
| 6.27 ± 0.02c | 6.21 ± 0.01c | 6.13 ± 0.02b | 6.01 ± 0.02a |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.37 ± 0.01aB | 0.47 ± 0.01bB | 0.58 ± 0.0cB | 0.73 ± 0.01dB |
|
| 0.24 ± 0.01aA | 0.32 ± 0.01bA | 0.53 ± 0.01cA | 0.66 ± 0.01dA |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.0022 ± 0.00a | 0.015 ± 0.001b | 0.027 ± 0.00Bc | 0.047 ± 0.001Bd |
|
| 0.0021 ± 0.00aa | 0.013 ± 0.001b | 0.022 ± 0.001Ac | 0.042 ± 0.001Ad |
*Mean ± SE with different superscripts in a row (lower case alphabet) and column (upper case alphabet) differ significantly (p < 0.05), n = 6 for each treatment, CO = Control, PK = Pumpkin.
Effect of refrigerated storage on microbiological characteristics of aerobically packaged cooked chicken sausages (Mean ± SE)
| Treatments | Storage period (Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 2.45 ±0.01a | 2.94 ± 0.01bA | 3.92 ± 0.01cA | 4.50 ± 0.01dA |
|
| 2.48 ± 0.02a | 3.32 ± 0.01bB | 4.10 ± 0.03cB | 4.93 ± 0.02dB |
|
| ||||
|
| ND | 1.68 ± 0.01aA | 2.14 ± 0.01bA | 2.90 ± 0.02cA |
|
| ND | 1.82 ± 0.02aB | 2.53 ± 0.02bB | 3.15 ± 0.02cB |
|
| ||||
|
| ND | ND | 1.77 ± 0.02aA | 2.51 ± 0.10b |
|
| ND | ND | 1.89 ± 0.01aB | 2.54 ± 0.02b |
*Mean ± SE with different superscripts in a row (lower case alphabet) and column (upper case alphabet) differ significantly (p < 0.05), n = 6, CO = Control, PK = Pumpkin, ND = not detected.
Effect of refrigerated storage on sensory attributes of aerobically packaged chicken sausages (Mean ± SE)
| Treatments | Storage period (Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 7.09 ± 0.09c | 7.23 ± 0.13c | 5.90 ± 0.11b | 4.71 ± 0.10a |
|
| 7.23 ± 0.13c | 7.19 ± 0.08c | 6.04 ± 0.10b | 5.04 ± 0.16a |
|
| ||||
|
| 7.28 ± 0.10d | 6.47 ± 0.22cB | 5.38 ± 0.25b | 4.66 ± 0.12a |
|
| 7.33 ± 0.14c | 5.76 ± 0.23bA | 5.57 ± 0.23b | 4.56 ± 0.14a |
|
| ||||
|
| 6.85 ± 0.14d | 6.38 ± 0.12c | 5.38 ± 0.20b | 4.52 ± 0.13a |
|
| 7.04 ± 0.16d | 6.23 ± 0.13c | 5.32 ± 0.21b | 4.52 ± 0.14a |
|
| ||||
|
| 7.47 ± 0.11dB | 6.52 ± 0.11c | 5.14 ± 0.12b | 4.28 ± 0.10a |
|
| 7.14 ± 0.12dA | 6.28 ± 0.10c | 5.09 ± 0.13b | 4.33 ± 0.12a |
|
| ||||
|
| 7.66 ± 0.12d | 6.61 ± 0.16c | 5.42 ± 0.13b | 4.33 ± 0.12a |
|
| 7.52 ± 0.20d | 6.57 ± 0.16c | 5.57 ± 0.18b | 4.28 ± 0.15a |
*Mean ± SE with different superscripts in a row (lower case) and column (upper case) differ significantly (p < 0.05), n = 21, CO = Control, PK = Pumpkin.