Literature DB >> 24493763

For telehealth to succeed, privacy and security risks must be identified and addressed.

Joseph L Hall, Deven McGraw.   

Abstract

The success of telehealth could be undermined if serious privacy and security risks are not addressed. For example, sensors that are located in a patient's home or that interface with the patient's body to detect safety issues or medical emergencies may inadvertently transmit sensitive information about household activities. Similarly, routine data transmissions from an app or medical device, such as an insulin pump, may be shared with third-party advertisers. Without adequate security and privacy protections for underlying telehealth data and systems, providers and patients will lack trust in the use of telehealth solutions. Although some federal and state guidelines for telehealth security and privacy have been established, many gaps remain. No federal agency currently has authority to enact privacy and security requirements to cover the telehealth ecosystem. This article examines privacy risks and security threats to telehealth applications and summarizes the extent to which technical controls and federal law adequately address these risks. We argue for a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for telehealth, developed and enforced by a single federal entity, the Federal Trade Commission, to bolster trust and fully realize the benefits of telehealth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer Issues; Home Care; Information Technology; Legal/Regulatory Issues; Medical technology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493763     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  67 in total

Review 1.  Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine.

Authors:  Danielle Chaet; Ron Clearfield; James E Sabin; Kathryn Skimming
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Social Media and Mobile Technology for Cancer Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; Steven S Coughlin; Elizabeth J Lyons
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

3.  Acceptability of mHealth augmentation of Collaborative Care: A mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Amy M Bauer; Matthew Iles-Shih; Reza Hosseini Ghomi; Tessa Rue; Tess Grover; Naomi Kincler; Monica Miller; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 4.  Mobile Mental Health: Navigating New Rules and Regulations for Digital Tools.

Authors:  James Armontrout; John Torous; Matthew Fisher; Eric Drogin; Thomas Gutheil
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Identification and Cost of Potentially Avoidable Transfers to a Tertiary Care Neurosurgery Service: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kuhn; Brian A Warmus; Matthew C Davis; Robert A Oster; Barton L Guthrie
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of teledermatology: Where are we now, and what are the barriers to adoption?

Authors:  Robin H Wang; John S Barbieri; Harrison P Nguyen; Robert Stavert; Howard P Forman; Jean L Bolognia; Carrie L Kovarik
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Endocrinology Telehealth Consultation Improved Glycemic Control Similar to Face-to-Face Visits in Veterans.

Authors:  Winnie Liu; David R Saxon; Bryan McNair; Rebecca Sanagorski; Neda Rasouli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-22

Review 8.  Deploying Your Telehealth Platform.

Authors:  Faryan Jalalabadi; Shayan A Izaddoost; Diana E Guillen; C Michael Fordis; Edward M Reece
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 9.  Personalized Technologies in Chronic Gastrointestinal Disorders: Self-monitoring and Remote Sensor Technologies.

Authors:  Muhammad Safwan Riaz; Ashish Atreja
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Connected Audiological Rehabilitation: 21st Century Innovations.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Theresa H Chisolm
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.