BACKGROUND: Thousands of neurosurgical emergencies are transferred yearly to tertiary care facilities to assume a higher level of care. Several studies have examined how neurosurgical transfers influence patient outcomes, but characteristics of potentially avoidable transfers have yet to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether potentially avoidable transfers represent a significant portion of transfers to a tertiary neurosurgical facility. METHODS: In this cohort study, we evaluated 916 neurosurgical patients transferred to a tertiary care facility over a 2-year period. Transfers were classified as potentially avoidable when no neurosurgical diagnostic test, intervention, or intensive monitoring was deemed necessary (n = 180). The remaining transfers were classified as justifiable (n = 736). The main outcomes and measures were age, sex, diagnosis, insurance status, intervention, distance of transfer, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, mortality, discharge disposition, and cost. RESULTS: Nearly 20% of transfers were identified as being potentially avoidable. Although some of these patients had suffered devastating, irrecoverable neurological insults, many had innocuous conditions that did not require transfer to a higher level of care. Justifiable transfers tend to involve patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage and cranial neoplasm. Both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit at the same rate (approximately 70% of patients). Finally, the direct transportation cost of potentially avoidable transfers was $1.46 million over 2 years. CONCLUSION: This study identified the frequency and expense of potentially avoidable transfers. There is a need for closer examination of the clinical and financial implications of potentially avoidable transfers. ABBREVIATIONS: CI, confidence intervalIQR, interquartile rangeJT, justifiable transferOR, odds ratioPAT, potentially avoidable transferUAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
BACKGROUND: Thousands of neurosurgical emergencies are transferred yearly to tertiary care facilities to assume a higher level of care. Several studies have examined how neurosurgical transfers influence patient outcomes, but characteristics of potentially avoidable transfers have yet to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether potentially avoidable transfers represent a significant portion of transfers to a tertiary neurosurgical facility. METHODS: In this cohort study, we evaluated 916 neurosurgical patients transferred to a tertiary care facility over a 2-year period. Transfers were classified as potentially avoidable when no neurosurgical diagnostic test, intervention, or intensive monitoring was deemed necessary (n = 180). The remaining transfers were classified as justifiable (n = 736). The main outcomes and measures were age, sex, diagnosis, insurance status, intervention, distance of transfer, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, mortality, discharge disposition, and cost. RESULTS: Nearly 20% of transfers were identified as being potentially avoidable. Although some of these patients had suffered devastating, irrecoverable neurological insults, many had innocuous conditions that did not require transfer to a higher level of care. Justifiable transfers tend to involve patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage and cranial neoplasm. Both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit at the same rate (approximately 70% of patients). Finally, the direct transportation cost of potentially avoidable transfers was $1.46 million over 2 years. CONCLUSION: This study identified the frequency and expense of potentially avoidable transfers. There is a need for closer examination of the clinical and financial implications of potentially avoidable transfers. ABBREVIATIONS: CI, confidence intervalIQR, interquartile rangeJT, justifiable transferOR, odds ratioPAT, potentially avoidable transferUAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Authors: Keith A Sanders; Rahul Patel; James M Kiely; Matthews W Gwynn; Lisa H Johnston Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Matthew Christopher Davis; Dang D Can; Jonathan Pindrik; Brandon G Rocque; James M Johnston Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Brian P Walcott; Jean-Valery Coumans; Matthew K Mian; Brian V Nahed; Kristopher T Kahle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Scott Haldeman; Roger Chou; Pierre Côté; Bart N Green; Margareta Nordin; Emre Acaroğlu; Arthur Ameis; Christine Cedraschi; Eric L Hurwitz; Selim Ayhan; David Borenstein; O'Dane Brady; Peter Brooks; Fereydoun Davatchi; Robert Dunn; Christine Goertz; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni; Jan Hartvigsen; Maria Hondras; Nadège Lemeunier; John Mayer; Silvano Mior; Jean Moss; Rajani Mullerpatan; Elijah Muteti; Lillian Mwaniki; Madeleine Ngandeu-Singwe; Geoff Outerbridge; Kristi Randhawa; Carlos Torres; Paola Torres; Adriaan Vlok; Chung Chek Wong Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Nima Alan; Song Kim; Nitin Agarwal; Jamie Clarke; Donald M Yealy; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Raymond F Sekula Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 1.961