Literature DB >> 24493183

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting without cage reinforcement for revision hip replacement: a minimum ten-year follow-up study.

J Gilbody1, C Taylor, G E Bartlett, S L Whitehouse, M J W Hubble, A J Timperley, J R Howell, M J Wilson.   

Abstract

Impaction bone grafting for the reconstitution of bone stock in revision hip surgery has been used for nearly 30 years. Between 1995 and 2001 we used this technique in acetabular reconstruction, in combination with a cemented component, in 304 hips in 292 patients revised for aseptic loosening. The only additional supports used were stainless steel meshes placed against the medial wall or laterally around the acetabular rim to contain the graft. All Paprosky grades of defect were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected in surviving patients at a minimum of ten years after the index operation. Mean follow-up was 12.4 years (sd 1.5) (10.0 to 16.0). Kaplan-Meier survival with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 85.9% (95% CI 81.0 to 90.8) at 13.5 years. Clinical scores for pain relief remained satisfactory, and there was no difference in clinical scores between cups that appeared stable and those that appeared radiologically loose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone grafting; Joint revision; Arthroplasty; Replacement; Hip; Outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493183     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  10 in total

1.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Impaction bone grafting for segmental acetabular defects: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Wagener Nele; Fritsch Martina; Reinicke Stefan; Layher Frank; Matziolis Georg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Rosario Madero; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  A Review and Description of Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting: Updating the Traditional Technique.

Authors:  Aun H Mirza; Shahzad Sadiq
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre-Escuredo; Eva Gómez-García; Salvador Álvarez-Villar; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects.

Authors:  Xianghong Zhang; Zhihong Li; Wanchun Wang; Tang Liu; Weiqiu Peng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Custom-made 3D-printed cup-cage implants for complex acetabular revisions: evaluation of pre-planned versus achieved positioning and 1-year migration data in 10 patients.

Authors:  Vasileios Zampelis; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.