Philip F Skiba1, Sarah Jackman, David Clarke, Anni Vanhatalo, Andrew M Jones. 1. 1Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, St. Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UNITED KINGDOM; and 2Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CANADA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We recently presented an integrating model of the curvature constant of the hyperbolic power-time relationship (W') that permits the calculation of the W' balance (W'BAL) remaining at any time during intermittent exercise. Although a relationship between recovery power and the rate of W' recovery was demonstrated, the effect of the length of work or recovery intervals remains unclear. METHODS: After determining VO2max, critical power, and W', 11 subjects completed six separate exercise tests on a cycle ergometer on different days, and in random order. Tests consisted of a period of intermittent severe-intensity exercise until the subject depleted approximately 50% of their predicted W'BAL, followed by a constant work rate (CWR) exercise bout until exhaustion. Work rates were kept constant between trials; however, either work or recovery durations during intermittent exercise were varied. The actual W' measured during the CWR (W'ACT) was compared with the amount of W' predicted to be available by the W'BAL model. RESULTS: Although some differences between W'BAL and W'ACT were noted, these amounted to only -1.6 ± 1.1 kJ when averaged across all conditions. The W'ACT was linearly correlated with the difference between VO2 at the start of CWR and VO2max (r = 0.79, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The W'BAL model provided a generally robust prediction of CWR W'. There may exist a physiological optimum formulation of work and recovery intervals such that baseline VO2 can be minimized, leading to an enhancement of subsequent exercise tolerance. These results may have important implications for athletic training and racing.
PURPOSE: We recently presented an integrating model of the curvature constant of the hyperbolic power-time relationship (W') that permits the calculation of the W' balance (W'BAL) remaining at any time during intermittent exercise. Although a relationship between recovery power and the rate of W' recovery was demonstrated, the effect of the length of work or recovery intervals remains unclear. METHODS: After determining VO2max, critical power, and W', 11 subjects completed six separate exercise tests on a cycle ergometer on different days, and in random order. Tests consisted of a period of intermittent severe-intensity exercise until the subject depleted approximately 50% of their predicted W'BAL, followed by a constant work rate (CWR) exercise bout until exhaustion. Work rates were kept constant between trials; however, either work or recovery durations during intermittent exercise were varied. The actual W' measured during the CWR (W'ACT) was compared with the amount of W' predicted to be available by the W'BAL model. RESULTS: Although some differences between W'BAL and W'ACT were noted, these amounted to only -1.6 ± 1.1 kJ when averaged across all conditions. The W'ACT was linearly correlated with the difference between VO2 at the start of CWR and VO2max (r = 0.79, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The W'BAL model provided a generally robust prediction of CWR W'. There may exist a physiological optimum formulation of work and recovery intervals such that baseline VO2 can be minimized, leading to an enhancement of subsequent exercise tolerance. These results may have important implications for athletic training and racing.
Authors: Philip Friere Skiba; Jonathan Fulford; David C Clarke; Anni Vanhatalo; Andrew M Jones Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Scott R Murgatroyd; Lindsey A Wylde; Daniel T Cannon; Susan A Ward; Harry B Rossiter Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Matthew J Davies; Alan P Benson; Daniel T Cannon; Simon Marwood; Graham J Kemp; Harry B Rossiter; Carrie Ferguson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Nathan E Townsend; David S Nichols; Philip F Skiba; Sebastien Racinais; Julien D Périard Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Michael J Puchowicz; Eliran Mizelman; Assaf Yogev; Michael S Koehle; Nathan E Townsend; David C Clarke Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 4.566