Literature DB >> 24888425

A 'ramp-sprint' protocol to characterise indices of aerobic function and exercise intensity domains in a single laboratory test.

Scott R Murgatroyd1, Lindsey A Wylde, Daniel T Cannon, Susan A Ward, Harry B Rossiter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The lactate threshold (LT), critical power (CP) and maximum oxygen uptake (VO₂max) together partition exercise intensity domains by their common physiological, biochemical and perceptual response characteristics. CP is the greatest power output attainable immediately following intolerance at VO₂peak, and the asymptote of 3 min all-out exercise. Thus we reasoned that a maximal 'sprint' immediately following standard ramp-incremental exercise would allow characterisation of the three aerobic indices in a single test.
METHODS: Ten healthy men (23 ± 3 year, mean ± SD) performed 9 cycle-ergometry tests on different days: (A) two ramp-incremental tests to intolerance (20 W min(-1)), immediately followed by a 3 min maximal, variable-power effort ramp-sprint test (RST) for LT, VO₂peak and sprint-phase power (SP) determination; (B) four constant-power tests for CP and VO₂max determination; (C) constant-power tests at 10 W below LT, and 10 W below and above SP to verify intensity domain characterisation. Capillary [lactate] and breath-by-breath VO₂ were measured.
RESULTS: Reproducibility of LT, SP and VO₂max measurements between RST repeats was within 5% or less (r ≥ 0.991, p < 0.001). CP (257 ± 46 W) was not different (p = 0.72) from SP (258 ± 42 W). Exercise 10 W below LT and SP resulted in steady state VO₂ and [lactate]. VO₂max (4.0 ± 0.6 L min(-1)), peak [lactate] (11 ± 2 mM) and intolerance were reached 19 ± 5 min into exercise at 10 W above SP.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the key indices of aerobic function may be accurately and reliably estimated during a single exercise test. This test may provide a basis for simplifying assessment and prescription of exercise training and experimental interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24888425     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2908-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  63 in total

Review 1.  Exercise limitation in health and disease.

Authors:  N L Jones; K J Killian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Determinants of the exercise endurance capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The power-duration relationship.

Authors:  J A Neder; P W Jones; L E Nery; B J Whipp
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  The critical power and related whole-body bioenergetic models.

Authors:  R Hugh Morton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Human critical power-oxygen uptake relationship at different pedalling frequencies.

Authors:  Tyler Barker; David C Poole; M Larry Noble; Thomas J Barstow
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 5.  Critical power: implications for determination of V˙O2max and exercise tolerance.

Authors:  Andrew M Jones; Anni Vanhatalo; Mark Burnley; R Hugh Morton; David C Poole
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  A 'new' method to normalise exercise intensity.

Authors:  K E Lansley; F J Dimenna; S J Bailey; A M Jones
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test.

Authors:  Haley C Bergstrom; Terry J Housh; Jorge M Zuniga; Daniel A Traylor; Robert W Lewis; Clayton L Camic; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The maximally attainable VO2 during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue.

Authors:  J R Day; H B Rossiter; E M Coats; A Skasick; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-07-11

9.  Stability of parameter estimates derived from the power/time relationship.

Authors:  J C Smith; D W Hill
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1993-03

10.  Oxygen uptake kinetics and lactate concentration during exercise in humans.

Authors:  W L Roston; B J Whipp; J A Davis; D A Cunningham; R M Effros; K Wasserman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-05
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Critical Power Model as a Potential Tool for Anti-doping.

Authors:  Michael J Puchowicz; Eliran Mizelman; Assaf Yogev; Michael S Koehle; Nathan E Townsend; David C Clarke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 2.  The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the 'gold standard'.

Authors:  Andrew M Jones; Mark Burnley; Matthew I Black; David C Poole; Anni Vanhatalo
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-05

3.  Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling.

Authors:  Bettina Karsten; Luca Petrigna; Andreas Klose; Antonino Bianco; Nathan Townsend; Christoph Triska
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Bi-exponential modelling of [Formula: see text] reconstitution kinetics in trained cyclists.

Authors:  Alan Chorley; Richard P Bott; Simon Marwood; Kevin L Lamb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Physiological and anthropometric determinants of critical power, W' and the reconstitution of W' in trained and untrained male cyclists.

Authors:  Alan Chorley; Richard P Bott; Simon Marwood; Kevin L Lamb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The ramp and all-out exercise test to determine critical power: validity and robustness to manipulations in body position.

Authors:  Richie P Goulding; Denise M Roche; Simon Marwood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.