Literature DB >> 24491237

Rehospitalization to primary versus different facilities following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Richard S Saunders1, Sara Fernandes-Taylor1, Amy J H Kind2, Travis L Engelbert1, Caprice C Greenberg1, Maureen A Smith3, Jon S Matsumura1, K Craig Kent4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reducing readmissions represents a unique opportunity to improve care and reduce health care costs and is the focus of major payers. A large number of surgical patients are readmitted to hospitals other than where the primary surgery was performed, resulting in clinical decisions that do not incorporate the primary surgeon and potentially alter outcomes. This study characterizes readmission to primary vs different hospitals after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and examines the implications with regard to mortality and cost.
METHODS: Patients who underwent open or endovascular aneurysm repair for AAA were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse, a random 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2005 to 2009. Outcomes for patients who underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days of initial discharge were compared based on readmission location (primary vs different hospital).
RESULTS: A total of 885 patients underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 626 (70.7%) returned to the primary facility, and 259 (29.3%) returned to a different facility. Greater distance from patient residence to the primary hospital was the strongest predictor of readmission to a different facility. Patients living 50 to 100 miles from the primary hospital were more likely to be readmitted to a different hospital compared with patients living <10 miles away (odds ratio, 8.50; P < .001). Patients with diagnoses directly related to the surgery (eg, wound infection) were more likely to be readmitted to the primary hospital, whereas medical diagnoses (eg, pneumonia and congestive heart failure) were more likely to be treated at a different hospital. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between patients readmitted to a different or the primary hospital. Median total 30-day payments were significantly lower at different vs primary hospitals (primary, $11,978 vs different, $11,168; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Readmission to a different facility after AAA repair is common and occurs more frequently than for the overall Medicare population. Patients travelling a greater distance for AAA repair are more likely to return to different vs the primary hospital when further care is required. For AAA repair, quality healthcare may be achieved at marginally lower cost and with greater patient convenience for selected readmissions at hospitals other than where the initial procedure was performed.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24491237      PMCID: PMC4028422          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  21 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  P J E Holt; J D Poloniecki; D Gerrard; I M Loftus; M M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases.

Authors:  W D'Hoore; A Bouckaert; C Tilquin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients.

Authors:  Grant D Stewart; Gareth Long; Bruce R Tulloh
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Differences in readmissions after open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Kevin Casey; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Matthew W Mell; Jason T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Costs of accessing surgical specialists by rural and remote residents.

Authors:  S L Rankin; W Hughes-Anderson; A K House; D I Heath; R J Aitken; J House
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Causes and implications of readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Caprice C Greenberg; Amy J H Kind; Jeffrey A Havlena; Matthew W Mell; Matthew T Nelson; Maureen A Smith; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; Karl A Eschbach; Courtney M Townsend; William H Nealon; Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; John T Chang; Saima Chaudhry; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings.

Authors:  Elise H Lawson; Bruce Lee Hall; Rachel Louie; Susan L Ettner; David S Zingmond; Lein Han; Michael Rapp; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  9 in total

1.  Cohort study of risk factors for 30-day readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Jamie B Smith; Robin L Kruse; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  Association of Patient-Reported Readiness for Discharge and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems Patient Satisfaction Scores: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; Sara E Holden; Xia Vang; Glen E Leverson; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital.

Authors:  Hongsoo Kim; William W Hung; Myunghee Cho Paik; Joseph S Ross; Zhonglin Zhao; Gi-Soo Kim; Kenneth Boockvar
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Impact of rural versus urban geographic location on length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Samantha D Minc; Ranjita Misra; Sari D Holmes; Yue Ren; Luke Marone
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.285

5.  Fragmentation of Care after Surgical Discharge: Non-Index Readmission after Major Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Chaoyi Zheng; Elizabeth B Habermann; Nawar M Shara; Russell C Langan; Young Hong; Lynt B Johnson; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Readmission destination and risk of mortality after major surgery: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Brooke; Philip P Goodney; Larry W Kraiss; Daniel J Gottlieb; Matthew H Samore; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Impact of Patient Safety Indicators on readmission after abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  2018-10-02

8.  Readmissions After Colon Cancer Surgery: Does It Matter Where Patients Are Readmitted?

Authors:  Ngoc-Phuong Luu; Tanvir Hussain; Hsien-Yen Chang; Elizabeth Pfoh; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 9.  Patient Outcomes Following Interhospital Care Fragmentation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katelin Snow; Karla Galaviz; Sara Turbow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.