Literature DB >> 17380547

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

P J E Holt1, J D Poloniecki, D Gerrard, I M Loftus, M M Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the volume-outcome relationship for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery and quantified critical volume thresholds.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched for articles on the operation volume-outcome relationship in elective and ruptured AAA surgery. UK Hospital Episode Statistics data were also considered. Elective and ruptured AAA repairs were dealt with separately. The data were meta-analysed, and the odds ratios (95 per cent confidence interval) for mortality at higher- and lower-volume hospitals were compared. Volume thresholds were identified from each paper.
RESULTS: The analysis included 421,299 elective and 45,796 ruptured AAA operations. Significant relationships between mortality and annual volume were noted for both groups. Overall, the weighted odds ratio was 0.66 (0.65 to 0.67) for elective repair at a threshold of 43 AAAs per annum and 0.78 (0.73 to 0.82) for ruptured aneurysm repair at a threshold of 15 AAAs per annum, both in favour of high-volume institutions.
CONCLUSION: Higher annual operation volumes are associated with significantly lower mortality in both elective and ruptured AAA repair. This suggests that AAA surgery should be performed only at higher-volume centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17380547     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  37 in total

1.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Roger Greenhalgh; Janet Powell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

2.  Cohort study of risk factors for 30-day readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Jamie B Smith; Robin L Kruse; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  How to improve surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J E Holt; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-21

4.  The Effects of Minimum Caseload Requirements on Management and Outcome in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Matthias Trenner; Michael Salvermoser; Albert Busch; Volker Schmid; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Andreas Kühnl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Open treatment versus endovascular repair for aortic abdominal aneurysm-keeping the balance.

Authors:  Wtgj Bos; T Cohen; G Vourliotakis; Mrhm van Sambeek; Elg Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2009-12-14

6.  [Colonic ischemia after open and endovascular aortic surgery : Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis And Therapy].

Authors:  Dmitriy I Dovzhanskiy; Maani Hakimi; Moritz S Bischoff; Caro la M Wieker; Thilo Hackert; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  NHS hospital readiness to embrace the proposed NICE guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm: a public perspective.

Authors:  A Misro; D Kanagalingam; S Theivacumar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Impact of Patient Safety Indicators on readmission after abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  2018-10-02

Review 10.  Ultrasonographic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Dittmar Böckler; Ingo Flessenkämper; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Sebastian Debus; Werner Lang
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.