Literature DB >> 24490790

The perception of probability.

C R Gallistel1, Monika Krishan2, Ye Liu1, Reilly Miller3, Peter E Latham3.   

Abstract

We present a computational model to explain the results from experiments in which subjects estimate the hidden probability parameter of a stepwise nonstationary Bernoulli process outcome by outcome. The model captures the following results qualitatively and quantitatively, with only 2 free parameters: (a) Subjects do not update their estimate after each outcome; they step from one estimate to another at irregular intervals. (b) The joint distribution of step widths and heights cannot be explained on the assumption that a threshold amount of change must be exceeded in order for them to indicate a change in their perception. (c) The mapping of observed probability to the median perceived probability is the identity function over the full range of probabilities. (d) Precision (how close estimates are to the best possible estimate) is good and constant over the full range. (e) Subjects quickly detect substantial changes in the hidden probability parameter. (f) The perceived probability sometimes changes dramatically from one observation to the next. (g) Subjects sometimes have second thoughts about a previous change perception, after observing further outcomes. (h) The frequency with which they perceive changes moves in the direction of the true frequency over sessions. (Explaining this finding requires 2 additional parametric assumptions.) The model treats the perception of the current probability as a by-product of the construction of a compact encoding of the experienced sequence in terms of its change points. It illustrates the why and the how of intermittent Bayesian belief updating and retrospective revision in simple perception. It suggests a reinterpretation of findings in the recent literature on the neurobiology of decision making. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24490790     DOI: 10.1037/a0035232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  21 in total

1.  Incremental implicit learning of bundles of statistical patterns.

Authors:  Ting Qian; T Florian Jaeger; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Florent Meyniel; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Timothy Doyeon Kim; Mohammad Kabir; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  If perception is probabilistic, why does it not seem probabilistic?

Authors:  Ned Block
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Metaplasticity as a Neural Substrate for Adaptive Learning and Choice under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Shiva Farashahi; Christopher H Donahue; Peyman Khorsand; Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy.

Authors:  Braden A Purcell; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Finding numbers in the brain.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Theoretical implications of quantitative properties of interval timing and probability estimation in mouse and rat.

Authors:  Aaron Kheifets; David Freestone; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming.

Authors:  Nathaniel Delaney-Busch; Emily Morgan; Ellen Lau; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.