| Literature DB >> 24489514 |
Aseel Mohammed Hamzah1, Aseel Mohammed Hussein1, Jenan Mahmoud Khalef1.
Abstract
The isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains from 22 out of 174 fecal samples from petting zoo animals representing twenty-two different species (camel, lion, goats, zebra, bear, baboon monkey, Siberian monkey, deer, elk, llama, pony, horses, fox, kangaroo, wolf, porcupine, chickens, tiger, ostrich, hyena, dogs, and wildcats) were investigated. One petting Al-Zawraa zoological society of Baghdad was investigated for E. coli O157:H7 over a 16-month period that spanned two summer and two autumn seasons. Variation in the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7-positive petting zoo animals was observed, with animals being culture positive only in the summer months but not in the spring, autumn, or winter. E. coli O157:H7 isolates were distinguished by agglutination with E. coli O157:H7 latex reagent (Oxoid), identified among the isolates, which showed that multiple E. coli strains were isolated from one petting zoo animal, in which a single animal simultaneously shed multiple E. coli strains; E. coli O157:H7 was isolated only by selective enrichment culture of 2 g of petting zoo animal feces. In contrast, strains other than O157:H7 were cultured from feces of petting zoo animals without enrichment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24489514 PMCID: PMC3893011 DOI: 10.1155/2013/843968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Number of positive E. coli O157:H7 animals from fecal samples collected and date of each collection for different animal species in Al-Zawraa zoological society of Baghdad.
| Animal spp. | Number of samples | Month of sample | No. of positive animals | Percentage of positive animals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 10 | June | 3 | 30% |
| Deer | 9 | June | 2 | 22.2% |
| Pony | 7 | June | 2 | 28.6% |
| Lion | 22 | April | 3 | 13.6% |
| Elk | 8 | April | 1 | 12.5% |
| Dog | 8 | September | Nil | 0% |
| Horse | 12 | April | 2 | 16.7% |
| Wildcat | 5 | September | Nil | 0% |
| Zebra | 5 | September | 1 | 20% |
| Siberia monkey | 9 | February | Nil | 0% |
| Ostrich | 3 | June | 2 | 66.7% |
| Baboon monkey | 9 | February | Nil | 0% |
| Hyena | 8 | April | 1 | 12.5% |
| Kangaroo | 1 | April | Nil | 0% |
| Wolf | 5 | February | Nil | 0% |
| Camel | 9 | June | Nil | 0% |
| Fox | 6 | June | Nil | 0% |
| Porcupine | 5 | February | Nil | 0% |
| Llama | 6 | June | 1 | 16.7% |
| Goat | 8 | June | 2 | 25% |
| Jaguar | 7 | April | 2 | 28.6% |
| Chicken | 6 | February | Nil | 0% |
The percentage of EHEC E. coli isolate and E. coli O157:H7 with its characteristic features.
| Animal spp. | Positive samples for EHEC | % of | Positive sample for O157:H7 | Sorbitol fermentation | Positive for O157 antigen | Positive for H7 antigen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 5 | 50% | 3 | + | + | + |
| Deer | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | + | + | + |
| Pony | 1 | 14.3% | 2 | + | + | + |
| Lion | 1 | 4.55% | 3 | + | + | + |
| Elk | Nil | — | 1 | + | + | + |
| Dog | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Horse | 1 | 8.3% | 2 | + | + | + |
| Wildcat | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Zebra | Nil | — | 1 | + | + | + |
| Siberia monkey | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Ostrich | 3 | 100% | 2 | + | + | + |
| Baboon monkey | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Hyena | Nil | — | 1 | + | + | + |
| Kangaroo | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Wolf | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Camel | 1 | 11.1% | Nil | − | − | − |
| Fox | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Porcupine | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
| Llama | 1 | 16.7% | 1 | + | + | + |
| Goat | Nil | — | 2 | + | + | + |
| Jaguar | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | + | + | + |
| Chicken | Nil | — | Nil | − | − | − |
Figure 1Sorbitol-nonfermented colonies of E. coli O157:H7 on CT-SMAC media.
Figure 2Agglutination of E. coli O157 and H7 latex reagent with isolates colonies of nonsorbitol-fermenting colonies on CT-SMAC medium.
Figure 3Agglutination kit (Oxoid) for diagnosis of E. coli O157:H7.