Literature DB >> 24485268

Robotics: The next step?

Ivo A M J Broeders1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Robotic systems were introduced 15 years ago to support complex endoscopic procedures. The technology is increasingly used in gastro-intestinal surgery. In this article, literature on experimental- and clinical research is reviewed and ergonomic issues are discussed.
METHODS: literature review was based on Medline search using a large variety of search terms, including e.g. robot(ic), randomized, rectal, oesophageal, ergonomics. Review articles on relevant topics are discussed with preference.
RESULTS: There is abundant evidence of supremacy in performing complex endoscopic surgery tasks when using the robot in an experimental setting. There is little high-level evidence so far on translation of these merits to clinical practice. DISCUSSION: Robotic systems may appear helpful in complex gastro-intestinal surgery. Moreover, dedicated computer based technology integrated in telepresence systems opens the way to integration of planning, diagnostics and therapy. The first high tech add-ons such as near infrared technology are under clinical evaluation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Endoscopic; Robotic; Surgery; da Vinci

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24485268     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  8 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Validation of ergonomic instructions in robot-assisted surgery simulator training.

Authors:  C D P Van't Hullenaar; A C Mertens; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center.

Authors:  Alexander C Mertens; Rob C Tolboom; Hana Zavrtanik; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Basem G Soliman; Duc T Nguyen; Edward Y Chan; Ray K Chihara; Leonora M Meisenbach; Edward A Graviss; Min P Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic repair of complete upside-down stomach hiatal hernia (the RATHER-study): a prospective comparative single center study.

Authors:  Alexander Wilhelm; Fabio Nocera; Fiorenzo V Angehrn; Martin Bolli; Romano Schneider; Luca Koechlin; Diana L Daume; Lana Fourie; Daniel Steinemann; Markus von Flüe; Ralph Peterli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ergonomic assessment of the da Vinci console in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Cas D P Van't Hullenaar; Ben Hermans; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-04-12

8.  Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the Versius Surgical System, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.

Authors:  Luke Hares; Paul Roberts; Keith Marshall; Mark Slack
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-12-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.