| Literature DB >> 24484583 |
Anand Krishnan1, Ritvik Amarchand, Peter Byass, Chandrakant Pandav, Nawi Ng.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Haryana was the first state in India to launch a conditional cash transfer (CCT) scheme in 1994. Initially it targeted all disadvantaged girls but was revised in 2005 to restrict it to second girl children of all groups. The benefit which accrued at girl attaining 18 years and subject to conditionalities of being fully immunized, studying till class 10 and remaining unmarried, was increased from about US$ 500 to US$ 2000. Using a mixed methods approach, we evaluated the implementation and possible impact of these two schemes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24484583 PMCID: PMC3922091 DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Summary of conditional cash transfer schemes for girl children in Haryana State
| Source of funds & year of launch | Government of Haryana | Government of Haryana |
| October 1994 | August 2005 | |
| Beneficiary/conditions Listed | Disadvantaged groups (Scheduled and backward castes and Below Poverty line) | Resident of Haryana on the birth of a second girl child conditional to completion of immunization and schooling. |
| Benefits/Penalties | US$ 10 to the mother within 15 days of birth. | US$ 100 per family per year upto 5 years invested in Government Bonds. Given at the age of the second girl attaining the age of 18 (matures to around US$ 2000). |
| Bonds of US$ 50 in the name of Child within 3 months to mature to US$ 500 by year 18. | ||
| In 1995, scheme expanded to offer a higher maturity amount for girls willing to defer redeeming their securities: Rs. US$ 600 for 2 yrs, or US$ 700 for 4 yrs. | ||
| Actual beneficiaries/Achievements | 2003-04 – 52,501 mothers enrolled in the state | Haryana – 49,558 in 2007–08 with US$ 5 million expenditure and in Faridabad Dist.- 2239 |
| Cumulatively up to March 2010–1,03,613 families have benefited and US$ 24 million spent | ||
| Comments/Remarks | ||
| | Not for the first girl child | |
| Prevents early marriage as well. | Prevents early marriage as well. Has been extended for next five years. | |
Community perceptions about girl child and government schemes on it (n = 200)
| Believed that society differentiates in bringing up of boys and girls | 47 |
| Believed that the girl child is discriminated because she is considered a “paraya dhan” (Others’ asset) | 41 |
| Said that pregnant women is pressurized by her spouse/in laws to go for sex determination | 77 |
| Estimated that more than 50% of the families in their villages go for sex determination tests | 36 |
| Said that government has not done enough to address the problem | 68 |
| Suggested following measures that government can take to address this issue | |
| • Financial help to the families with girl children | 79 |
| • Penalties to those going for sex determination | 25 |
| Said that there was an improvement in the attitude towards girl child in last few years | 72.5 |
| Were aware of | |
| • Existence of any girl child related schemes | 56% |
| • Apni Beti Apna Dhan (ABAD) | 15% |
| • Laadli | 9% |
Assessment of impact of conditional cash transfer based interventions on status of girl children (1992–2010)
| Sex ratio at Birth (girls per 1000 boys) | All children (n) | 866 (6532) | 862 (8480) | 845 (12488) | 826 (12091) | NS |
| First Born | 827 | 912 | 893 | 904 | NS | |
| Subsequent Born | 896 | 846 | 825′ | 780 | NS | |
| Proportion completely immunized by 1 year | Girls born in this period | 59.8 | 70.1 | 88.8 | 95.8 | .00 |
| Boys born in this period | 62.0 | 71.5 | 89.9 | 97.0 | .00 | |
| Proportion educated ≥ 10th grade among those married in the years | Daughters (n) | 2.5 (1370) | 4.4 (2298) | 8.6 (2475) | 27.9 (2578) | .000 |
| Non-Haryana DILs* (n) | 15.8 (476) | 18.5 (750) | 25.1 (1354) | 41.2 (1669) | .000 | |
| Mean age ± S.D. at marriage among those married in the years | Daughters (n) | 18.3 ± 2.7 (1370) | 18.1 ± 2.9 (2298) | 18.7 ± 2.9 (2475) | 19.7 ± 2.8 (2578) | .0000 |
| Non-Haryana DILs* (n) | 19.1 ± 2.7 (476) | 19.1 + 2.9 (750) | 19.4 ± 2.8 (1354) | 19.7 ± 2.7 (1669) | .0000 | |
*DIL – daughter in-law.
Themes categories and subcategories of program implementers’ experiences of implementing conditional cash transfer schemes for girl children in Ballabgarh
| “Conspiracy of silence” | Undervalue the seriousness of problem | Restrict the problem to specific groups (Only those with many girls discriminate; This is not seen in urban areas; seen only in slums due to lack of awareness) |
| Complete denial of its presence (Have not seen this problem in my area) | ||
| Overrate the effectiveness of the program | The problem is decreasing | |
| The program has been very effective | ||
| Passive involvement of community in the program | Lack of awareness about the programs | |
| Anganwadi workers filling the forms house to house | ||
| Clash between the political culture of subsidy and bureaucratic approach of accountability | A culture of subsidies | Nobody says no to free money |
| Mainly come forward to claim money, no real change | ||
| Why not give it to first child also | ||
| “Politician giveth away but Bureaucracy taketh away” | Presence of other schemes like free education, Kanyadaan etc. which also give free subsidies | |
| Bureaucratic approach of the program | Too many conditionalities | |
| Need for documentation | ||
| Delay in release of certificates |