Literature DB >> 2448428

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response.

K Winkler1, G Beron, G Delling, U Heise, H Kabisch, C Purfürst, J Berger, J Ritter, H Jürgens, V Gerein.   

Abstract

Following observation of the predictive value of the histologic extent of tumor cell destruction after preoperative chemotherapy for metastasis-free survival (MFS) in osteosarcoma, a randomized study was undertaken with the aim of (1) sparing some patients the unpleasant side effects of highly toxic drugs like doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CPDD) by administering these drugs postoperatively only after poor response with a milder preoperative regimen, and (2) improving the prognosis of patients responding poorly to the initial treatment by use of a salvage chemotherapy postoperatively. The available patients were divided into two groups. Those in the study arm received a preoperative chemotherapy consisting of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and the triple drug combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD) and were switched to DOX/CPDD postoperatively in case of poor response. DOX/CPDD was used besides HDMTX for initial treatment in the control arm, and BCD alternatively with CPDD/ifosfamide (IFO) for postoperative salvage treatment. The response rate of the study arm was significantly inferior to the control arm (26% v 60%; P less than .001). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of poor responders after salvage chemotherapy also was poorest in the study arm (41%); it was unchanged in the control arm (53%) as compared with that of poor responders from the COSS-80 study without salvage chemotherapy (52%). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of good responders was 73% in the study arm, 79% in the control arm, and not significantly different from that of the COSS-80 study (84%), although postoperative chemotherapy of good responders had been markedly shortened as compared with the COSS-80 study. The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of the study arm as a whole was inferior to that of the control arm (49% v 68%; P less than .1) and also inferior to the COSS-80 study (68%; P less than .01), indicating a failure of the employed salvage strategy in general and especially of the effort to restrict the use of the very effective but highly toxic drugs DOX and CPDD to patients resistant to a less toxic initial treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2448428     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  62 in total

1.  Adriamycin binding assay: a valuable chemosensitivity test in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  N Baldini; K Scotlandi; M Serra; K Kusuzaki; T Shikita; M C Manara; D Maurici; M Campanacci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Evaluation of chemotherapy before limb-sparing surgery for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  T Ishida; M Takami
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Role of MRI in osteosarcoma for evaluation and prediction of chemotherapy response: correlation with histological necrosis.

Authors:  Jyoti Bajpai; Shivanand Gamnagatti; Rakesh Kumar; Vishnubhatla Sreenivas; Mehar Chand Sharma; Shah Alam Khan; Shishir Rastogi; Arun Malhotra; Rajni Safaya; Sameer Bakhshi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-10-27

4.  Avoidance of exenteration in orbital sebaceous gland carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ajay Gogia; Neelam Pushker; Seema Sen; Sameer Bakhshi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Survival from high-grade localised extremity osteosarcoma: combined results and prognostic factors from three European Osteosarcoma Intergroup randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J S Whelan; R C Jinks; A McTiernan; M R Sydes; J M Hook; L Trani; B Uscinska; V Bramwell; I J Lewis; M A Nooij; M van Glabbeke; R J Grimer; P C W Hogendoorn; A H M Taminiau; H Gelderblom
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Local growth and the prognosis of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  P Wuisman; W F Enneking; A Roesner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The multidisciplinary management of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Noah Federman; Nicholas Bernthal; Fritz C Eilber; William D Tap
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24

8.  [Chemotherapy-induced changes in high grade central osteosarcomas-experiences gained through the assignment as reference-pathologists of the COSS-studies].

Authors:  M Werner; G Delling
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Advancing therapy for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Gill; Richard Gorlick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Emerging chemotherapeutic strategies and the role of treatment stratification in Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Beatrice M Seddon; Jeremy S Whelan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.