Literature DB >> 24484221

Cutaneous pyeloureteral stent for laparoscopic (robot)-assisted pyeloplasty.

Pankaj P Dangle1, Anup B Shah, Mohan S Gundeti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In select centers, laparoscopic (robot)-assisted pyeloplasty has emerged as a viable approach for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Stent placement for urinary diversion is a common postoperative practice with several potential techniques and respective challenges. Robot-assisted diversion techniques such as indwelling Double-J or nephroureteral stents require either additional anesthesia or costs or they carry bleeding risks. Herein we describe an alternative postpyeloplasty cutaneous pyeloureteral (CPU) stenting technique that minimizes these challenges and achieves effective urinary diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24484221      PMCID: PMC4382828          DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Selcuk Yucel; Mindy L Samuelson; Michael T Nguyen; Linda A Baker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Use of internal stent, external transanastomotic stent or no stent during pediatric pyeloplasty: a decision tree cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jenny H Yiee; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stent placement during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Paul H Noh; W Robert Defoor; Pramod P Reddy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Transanastomotic stents for dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  I Serdar Arda; Pelin Oguzkurt; Sinasi Sevmis
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice?

Authors:  P F Austin; M P Cain; R C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The use of a multipurpose stent in children.

Authors:  Z Zaidi; P D Mouriquand
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-11

7.  Transpelvic anastomotic stenting: a good option for diversion after pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Tan Son Le; Cong Thang Le; Thanh Hung Le; Thi Dan Tram Nguyen; Cao Nhan Huynh; Thi Truc Linh Nguyen
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.

Authors:  Luis H P Braga; Armando J Lorenzo; Walid A Farhat; Darius J Bägli; Antoine E Khoury; Joao L Pippi Salle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Open pyeloplasty in children: experience with an improved stenting technique.

Authors:  M J Reed; M P L Williams
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Kidney internal splint/stent (KISS) catheter revisited for pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Brian A VanderBrink; Clint Cary; Mark P Cain
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.649

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  P Murthy; J A Cohn; M S Gundeti
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  D I Chu; D Shrivastava; J P Van Batavia; D K Bowen; C C Tong; C J Long; D A Weiss; A R Shukla; A K Srinivasan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 1.830

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.