Literature DB >> 21527233

Transpelvic anastomotic stenting: a good option for diversion after pyeloplasty in children.

Tan Son Le1, Cong Thang Le, Thanh Hung Le, Thi Dan Tram Nguyen, Cao Nhan Huynh, Thi Truc Linh Nguyen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several options are available to drain the renal pelvis after a dysmembered pyeloplasty. The purpose of our study was to review the results of transrenal pelvic transanastomotic stenting following ureteropelvic junction obstruction pyeloplasty (UPJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 238 patients with UPJO (243 renal units) treated in 2004-2007. The patients were divided into 4 groups (1): renal units with very poor function (<10% uptake) having undergone nephrostomy tube placement, with pyeloplasty performed 1 month later for those with improved renal function, and nephrectomy for those with no improvement (2); pyeloplasty without diversion (3); pyeloplasty diverted with transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting (4); pyeloplasties diverted with both stents and Foley catheters; the stents used were 5 Fr or 6 Fr feeding tubes.
RESULTS: Group 1: 13 nephrectomies and 31 pyeloplasties diverted with stents and Foley catheters; 1/31 re-do pyeloplasty. Group 2: 33 pyeloplasties that were performed without diversion or stenting; 2/33 required re-do pyeloplasty. Group 3: 122 pyeloplasties diverted with only stents inserted through renal pelvis with 1 nephrostomy due to urine leakage, 2 prolonged urine leaks that ceased spontaneously, 1 urinary infection, no re-do pyeloplasty needed. Group 4: 44 pyeloplasties that were performed with stents and nephrostomy tubes, 2 delays of removal of Foley catheters, no re-do pyeloplasty needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting using a feeding tube is a good option for diverting urine following dysmembered pyeloplasty in children.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527233     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  4 in total

1.  Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.

Authors:  Linda C Lee; Niki Kanaroglou; Joseph M Gleason; Joao L Pippi Salle; Darius J Bägli; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Cutaneous pyeloureteral stent for laparoscopic (robot)-assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Pankaj P Dangle; Anup B Shah; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  D I Chu; D Shrivastava; J P Van Batavia; D K Bowen; C C Tong; C J Long; D A Weiss; A R Shukla; A K Srinivasan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Therapeutic approaches and long-term follow-up for prenatal hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Bahattin Aydogdu; Gulay Tireli; Oyhan Demirali; Unal Guvenc; Cemile Besik; Serdar Sander; Aysel Kiyak
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.