Peptide-pulsed T2 cells are routinely used to study T-cell activation by MHC-restricted peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Nevertheless, the capacity of T2 cells to present antigenic epitopes remains to be precisely quantified, primarily due to the detection limits imposed by available methods. Since naturally-processed TAA-derived epitopes have been shown to be displayed at levels as low as 10-150 copies per cell, highly sensitive detection and quantification techniques are essential to assess the natural degree of T-cell sensitivity. Here, we report the use of soluble, high-affinity T-cell receptors (TCRs) coupled with single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to quantify three reported TAA-derived epitopes on peptide-pulsed T2 cells, dissecting the relationship between concentration of exogenous peptide, number of epitopes presented, and activation of epitope-specific T cells. Our findings indicate that peptide concentrations in the low nanomolar range are required for T2 cells to present TAAs in extents that are comparable to those of malignant cells.
Peptide-pulsed T2 cells are routinely used to study T-cell activation by MHC-restricted peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Nevertheless, the capacity of T2 cells to present antigenic epitopes remains to be precisely quantified, primarily due to the detection limits imposed by available methods. Since naturally-processed TAA-derived epitopes have been shown to be displayed at levels as low as 10-150 copies per cell, highly sensitive detection and quantification techniques are essential to assess the natural degree of T-cell sensitivity. Here, we report the use of soluble, high-affinity T-cell receptors (TCRs) coupled with single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to quantify three reported TAA-derived epitopes on peptide-pulsed T2 cells, dissecting the relationship between concentration of exogenous peptide, number of epitopes presented, and activation of epitope-specific T cells. Our findings indicate that peptide concentrations in the low nanomolar range are required for T2 cells to present TAAs in extents that are comparable to those of malignant cells.
The activation of cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) is mediated by the recognition of antigenic
peptides displayed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in association with MHC
class I molecules. The process of antigen recognition is controlled by the T-cell receptor
(TCR) and is essential for the maintenance of protective immunity against infectious disease
as well as (pre)malignant conditions. Consequently, methodologies that facilitate the
investigation of TCR-dependent antigen recognition and subsequent CTL activation not only
are vital for the development of new immunotherapeutic strategies, but also are essential
tools for experimental immunologists. The use of T2 cells to probe antigen recognition by
CTLs is well-established and relies on the induction of T2 cells to display MHC class I
molecules associated with exogenously administered peptides. T2 cells are deficient in a
peptide transporter involved in antigen processing (TAP) and therefore fail to correctly
translocate endogenous (processed) peptides to the site of MHC loading in the endoplasmic
reticulum/Golgi apparatus. Thus,
peptide-pulsed T2 cells can be used to monitor the CTL response to an exogenous antigen of
interest in a non-competitive environment. Despite the widespread use of peptide-pulsed T2
cells, a correlation between the concentration of exogenous peptides used for pulsing and
the number of epitopes presented on the cell surface has not yet been provided. This is
relevant especially when CTL activation by tumor-associated antigen (TAA)-derived peptides
is assessed, as these antigenic epitopes may be displayed in amounts as low as 10–150
copies per APC.,Epitopes presented on the surface of APCs can be quantified by means of soluble proteins,
including antibody fragments, that specifically bind to the peptide/MHC complex of
interest. However, one of the major
drawbacks of this approach is the generally low binding affinity of antibody fragments,
posing a significant problem for the detection and quantification of TAA epitopes presented
in limited amounts. While improvements in binding affinity have been achieved upon
oligomerization, these appear to be beneficial only for antigens that are presented on the
cell surface at high densities. The use of
soluble, monoclonal TCRs (mTCRs) genetically engineered to possess an extremely high
affinity for cognate antigens (in the picomolar range) not only offers a new solution for
the quantification of epitopes presented in limited quantities,,, but
also is able to resolve information at the single-cell level. In addition, the prolonged
binding half-life of high-affinity mTCRs reduces the need for rapid experimental
assessments.Here, we used high affinity mTCRs to investigate the presentation of reported TAA-derived
epitopes on T2 cells. First, single-molecule microscopy was used to detect and quantify the
presentation of 3 distinct epitopes. Second, the influence of peptide concentration on
epitope presentation by T2 cells was examined and compared with natural presentation levels.
Finally, the potency of the T-cell response to various amounts of presented epitopes was
analyzed. Our findings demonstrate that peptide concentrations in the nanomolar range lead
to the presentation of a number of epitopes that is comparable to that observed on the
surface of tumor cells and that these concentrations are suitable to investigate the natural
level of T-cell sensitivity to TAAs. These observations apply to three subclasses of TAAs:
cancer-testis antigens, such as NY-ESO-1, overexpressed TAAs, such as Wilms’ tumor 1
(WT1) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), and differentiation-associated TAAs, such
as premelanosome protein (PMEL, best known as gp100).
Results
Quantification of epitopes presented on peptide-pulsed T2 cells
Soluble, biotinylated mTCRs were used to detect MHC-restricted epitopes on the surface of
peptide-pulsed T2 cells. Each mTCR is antigen specific and exhibits a binding affinity in
the low picomolar range. mTCRs specific for NY-ESO-1 and TERT have
previously been shown by flow cytometry to bind T2 cells pulsed with cognate antigenic
peptides. Here we show that this is also the case for gp100- and WT1-specific mTCRs (Fig. 1). In summary, all four mTCRs employed in this
study bind their cognate epitopes in a manner that depends on peptide concentration,
indicating that, for any given peptide, T2 cell presentation can be modulated in a
predictable manner by altering the concentration of exogenous peptides.
Figure 1. Flow cytometry-based detection of epitope-bound
monoclonal TCRs on peptide-pulsed T2 cells. T2 cells were pulsed with the indicated
HLA-A2-restricted peptides in concentrations ranging from 10−5 to
10−9 M. Epitope presentation was detected using a high-affinity
biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCR) specific for gp100 (left panel) or
Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1, right panel) and flow cytometry, upon staining with
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated streptavidin. A control measurement was made using T2
cell pulsed with 10−5 M of an irrelevant peptide (shaded gray).
Figure 1. Flow cytometry-based detection of epitope-bound
monoclonal TCRs on peptide-pulsed T2 cells. T2 cells were pulsed with the indicated
HLA-A2-restricted peptides in concentrations ranging from 10−5 to
10−9 M. Epitope presentation was detected using a high-affinity
biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCR) specific for gp100 (left panel) or
Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1, right panel) and flow cytometry, upon staining with
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated streptavidin. A control measurement was made using T2
cell pulsed with 10−5 M of an irrelevant peptide (shaded gray).The detection of epitope-bound mTCRs using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy rather
than flow cytometry has a number of advantages, including the possibility to resolve the
number of epitopes presented by individual cells as well as an improved detection
sensitivity. Indeed, Purbhoo et al.
provided microscopy data indicating that very low numbers of NY-ESO-1-derived epitopes (in
the range of 10–50 per cell) could be detected on T2 cells pulsed with exogenous
peptide concentrations ranging from 10−9 to 10−11
M. To investigate whether this
observation could be extended to other reported TAA-derived epitopes, epitope-bound
gp100-, TERT- and WT1-targeting mTCRs were quantified by single-molecule fluorescence
microscopy on T2 cells pulsed with nanomolar amounts of the corresponding peptides. We
observed that T2 cells pulsed with peptide in concentrations of 10−8 to
10−10 M do present low numbers of epitopes, on average 4–80
copies per cell (Fig. 2). Since each mTCR
displays a high affinity for its cognate antigen and the half-life of binding to antigenic
epitopes presented on the cell surface is approximately 20 h (data not shown), each
fluorescent signal is assumed to correspond to one single epitope and all epitopes are
assumed to be bound by an mTCR. We also observed an increasingly large variation in the
number of epitopes presented by individual cells as the concentration of peptide used for
pulsing T2 cells is raised. In particular, at 10−8 M some T2 cells
individually displayed over 100 epitopes, while others displayed fewer than 20 (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Quantification of epitopes on T2 cells using monoclonal
TCRs and single-molecule microscopy. Peptides derived from the tumor-associated
antigens (TAAs) gp100, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), and Wilms’
tumor 1 (WT1) were used to pulse T2 cells in concentrations ranging from
10−7 to 10−10 M. Epitopes were bound by high
affinity, biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCRs) and visualized by microscopy
upon staining with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated streptavidin. Solid bars depict the
number of epitopes presented by individual T2 cells (means). At concentrations of
10−7 M, the number of epitopes was incompatible with accurate
counting. In each case a background measurement was made using a high-affinity mTCR
specific for an irrelevant, HIV-1-derived antigen (Gag77–85), using a
peptide concentration of 10−5M. The Y-axis on each graph has been
optimized to best represent the distribution. Representative phase contrast and
fluorescence images are shown for gp100 (upper panel), TERT (middle panel), and WT1
(lower panel). Fluorescence images are three-dimensional reconstructions of individual
planes. The brightness/contrast of individual phase contrast and fluorescence images
was adjusted to optimize epitope visualization. Scale bar = 20 µm.
Figure 2. Quantification of epitopes on T2 cells using monoclonal
TCRs and single-molecule microscopy. Peptides derived from the tumor-associated
antigens (TAAs) gp100, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), and Wilms’
tumor 1 (WT1) were used to pulse T2 cells in concentrations ranging from
10−7 to 10−10 M. Epitopes were bound by high
affinity, biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCRs) and visualized by microscopy
upon staining with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated streptavidin. Solid bars depict the
number of epitopes presented by individual T2 cells (means). At concentrations of
10−7 M, the number of epitopes was incompatible with accurate
counting. In each case a background measurement was made using a high-affinity mTCR
specific for an irrelevant, HIV-1-derived antigen (Gag77–85), using a
peptide concentration of 10−5M. The Y-axis on each graph has been
optimized to best represent the distribution. Representative phase contrast and
fluorescence images are shown for gp100 (upper panel), TERT (middle panel), and WT1
(lower panel). Fluorescence images are three-dimensional reconstructions of individual
planes. The brightness/contrast of individual phase contrast and fluorescence images
was adjusted to optimize epitope visualization. Scale bar = 20 µm.To link the number of epitopes observed on pulsed T2 cells with the number naturally
presented on malignant cells, the gp100-derived epitope was quantified on two melanoma
cell lines, Mel526 and Mel624 cells. The data presented in Figure 3 demonstrate that, on average, Mel526 and Mel624 cells present 37
and 34 epitopes per cell, respectively, consistent with the range detected on T2 cells
pulsed with nanomolar amounts of a gp100-derived peptide (Fig. 2). These data are also in line with the previously reported amounts
of NY-ESO epitopes presented on melanoma cell lines, averaging ~25 and ~45 epitopes per
cell for SK-Mel37 and Mel624 cells, respectively. Furthermore, we observed a similarly wide distribution in the
number of gp100-derived epitopes presented on individual melanoma cells (Fig. 3) and T2 cells pulsed with nanomolar amounts
of gp100-derived peptides (Fig. 2). In
particular, T2 cells pulsed with 10−9 M of the gp100-derived peptide
presented 12–47 gp100 epitopes per cell (Fig. 2), while Mel526 and Mel624 cells naturally presented 18–68 and
9–68 gp100 epitopes per cell, respectively (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Quantification of epitopes on Mel526 and Mel624 melanoma
cells. A gp100-specific biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCR) was allowed to
bind to gp100-derived epitopes naturally presented on melanoma Mel526 and Mel624
cells, and visualized by microscopy upon staining with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated
streptavidin. Solid bars depict the number of epitopes presented by individual tumor
cells (means). A background control measurement was made using a high-affinity mTCR
specific for an irrelevant, HIV-1-derived antigen (Gag77–85).
Representative phase contrast and fluorescence images for the 2 cell lines are shown.
Fluorescence images are three-dimensional reconstructions of individual planes. The
brightness/contrast of fluorescence images was adjusted to optimize epitope
visualization. Scale bar = 20 µm.
Figure 3. Quantification of epitopes on Mel526 and Mel624 melanoma
cells. A gp100-specific biotinylated monoclonal T-cell receptor (mTCR) was allowed to
bind to gp100-derived epitopes naturally presented on melanoma Mel526 and Mel624
cells, and visualized by microscopy upon staining with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated
streptavidin. Solid bars depict the number of epitopes presented by individual tumor
cells (means). A background control measurement was made using a high-affinity mTCR
specific for an irrelevant, HIV-1-derived antigen (Gag77–85).
Representative phase contrast and fluorescence images for the 2 cell lines are shown.
Fluorescence images are three-dimensional reconstructions of individual planes. The
brightness/contrast of fluorescence images was adjusted to optimize epitope
visualization. Scale bar = 20 µm.
Activation of T cells by peptide-pulsed T2 cells
To correlate the number of epitopes presented on the cell surface of T2 cells with their
ability to activate T cells, interferon γ (IFNγ) release was monitored from T
cells transduced with wild-type TCRs specific for NY-ESO-1-, gp100-, TERT-, or WT1-derived
peptides, upon exposure to T2 cells previously pulsed with 10−7 to
10−12 M of the corresponding peptides. We observed that, regardless of
the TAA specificity, partial T-cell activation is induced in response to T2 cells pulsed
with 10−8 M to 10−10 M TAA-derived peptides (Fig. 4).
Figure 4. T-cell response to peptide pulsed T2 cells as determined
by interferon γ release. ELIPOST assays were used to measure the level of T-cell
activation, assessed in terms of interferon γ (IFNγ) release, in response
to T2 cells presenting varying levels of epitopes. CD8+ and
CD4+ T cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells
and transduced with wild-type TCRs specific for NY-ESO-1-, gp100-, telomerase reverse
transcriptase (TERT)-, and Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1)-derived peptides. T2 cells were
pulsed with antigenic peptides in concentrations ranging from 10−7 to
10−12 M. A control was performed in each case using non-transduced
(ntd) T cells and a peptide concentration of 10−7 M. The bar above
the graph indicates the peptide concentration range in which physiological numbers of
epitopes are presented.
Figure 4. T-cell response to peptide pulsed T2 cells as determined
by interferon γ release. ELIPOST assays were used to measure the level of T-cell
activation, assessed in terms of interferon γ (IFNγ) release, in response
to T2 cells presenting varying levels of epitopes. CD8+ and
CD4+ T cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells
and transduced with wild-type TCRs specific for NY-ESO-1-, gp100-, telomerase reverse
transcriptase (TERT)-, and Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1)-derived peptides. T2 cells were
pulsed with antigenic peptides in concentrations ranging from 10−7 to
10−12 M. A control was performed in each case using non-transduced
(ntd) T cells and a peptide concentration of 10−7 M. The bar above
the graph indicates the peptide concentration range in which physiological numbers of
epitopes are presented.
Discussion
The combination of high affinity mTCRs and single-molecule fluorescence microscopy provides
an extremely sensitive method for the detection and quantification of MHC-restricted
epitopes at the single cell level, not only on T2 cells and cancer cell lines, as
demonstrated here, but also potentially on many other antigen-presenting cells, including
dendritic cells and primary tissue cells.Since pulsing T2 cells with reported TAA-derived peptides in low nanomolar concentrations
(10−10 –10−8 M) results in the presentation of a
physiological amount of epitopes, the corresponding T-cell response is likely to reflect the
natural level of T-cell sensitivity to the specific epitope under investigation. This
observation has important implications for scientists using peptide-pulsed T2 cells to
determine T-cell sensitivity to TAAs. Peptide pulsing is routinely performed using peptide
concentrations in the micromolar range.,
However, on the basis of the data presented here, such high concentrations are associated
with the risk of producing T2 cells that present an unnaturally elevated number of epitopes.
In turn this not only may result in an inaccurate assessment of T-cell sensitivity to
naturally presented TAAs, but also may give false indications on the suitability of specific
T cells or TCRs for immunotherapeutic applications.For the four different TAAs investigated here, T cells expressing wild-type TCRs against a
specific peptide/MHC complex respond only to partial extents to physiological numbers of
epitopes presented on the surface of T2 cells. Given the wide variation in the number of
epitopes presented by individual T2 cells, which is exacerbated with increasing peptide
concentrations (Fig. 2), these results point to a
mechanism whereby the potency of T-cell responses vary depending on the number of antigenic
epitopes encountered, with a minimum number of epitopes being required to provoke T-cell
activation. Furthermore, these observations indicate how suboptimal levels of antigen
presentation, such as those that occur upon the downregulation of MHC class I molecules by
cancer cells or when TAA-specific T cells exhibit a weak affinity for cognate antigens, may
prevent productive T-cell activation, allowing malignant cells to evade immune detection,
one of the key obstacles against achieving greater success with some anticancer
immunotherapies.The results presented herein demonstrate the potential utility of high-affinity mTCRs as
diagnostic tools to detect and quantify the presentation of TAA-derived epitopes on the cell
surface. Furthermore, new bi-specific therapeutic reagents comprising a CD3-specific
single-chain variable fragments fused to the high-affinity soluble mTCRs used here are able
to elicit a potent immune response despite low levels of antigen presentation and the weak
affinity of TAA-specific T cells. Provided that comprehensive preclinical assessments are
undertaken and show reassuring safety and efficacy results, these reagents offer a new
immunotherapeutic strategy against cancer.,
Materials and Methods
Peptides and cell lines
Synthetic peptides corresponding to NY-ESO-1157–165 (SLLMWITQV),
gp100280–288 (YLEPGPVTV), TERT540–548 (ILAKFLHWL),
WT1126–134 (RLFPNAPYV) and HIV-1-derived Gag77–85
(SLYNTVATL) were obtained from Peptide Protein Research and dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO) at 4 mg/mL prior to use. The C-terminal residues of
NY-ESO-1157–165 and gp100280–288, as well as the
residues at position 2 and 9 of WT1126–134 peptide, have been mutated to
improve the stability of peptide/MHC complexes. Mel526 and Mel624 cells were obtained from
Thymed and maintained in standard culture conditions.
Protein production
Soluble mTCRs with picomolar affinity for cognate antigens were produced as previously
described., Briefly, the DNA encoding the α and
β chains of affinity-enhanced TCRs were isolated from peptide-specific T-cell lines
by PCR. The resulting TCR chain-coding sequences were then expressed in
Escherichia coli and soluble disulfide-linked heterodimeric mTCRs were
purified by anion exchange and size exclusion chromatography. mTCRs were biotinylated on
the β chain and purified as previously described.
Peptide pulsing and flow cytometry
One million T2 cells were pulsed with a serial dilution of each TAA-derived peptide,
ranging from 10−5 to 10−11 M, for 90 min at 37°C.
Cells were then stained as described previously. Briefly, cells were incubated with 5 µg/mL high-affinity
biotinylated mTCRs at in PBS supplemented with 0.5% bovineserum albumin (BSA) for
30 min at room temperature (RT), followed by a 20 min incubation at RT with 10 µg/mL
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated streptavidin (BD Bioscience). Samples were acquired on an
FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and plated onto a multi-well glass chamber for
microscopic acquisitions. Flow cytometry data files were analyzed with the FloJo software
version 7.6.
Microscopy
T2 cells or melanoma cells were plated on glass coverslip chambers and stained with 5
µg/mL high-affinity biotinylated mTCRs in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA, 400
nM CaCl2 and 400 nM MgCl2 for 30 min at RT. Then, samples were
incubated with for 20 min at RT with 10 µg/mL PE-conjugated streptavidin (BD
Bioscience). Phase-contrast and PE-dependent fluorescence images were acquired as
previously described using a
200M/Universal Imaging system with a 63 × objective (Carl Zeiss Inc.). Z-stack
fluorescent images were taken (27 individual planes, 0.7 µm apart) to cover the
entire 3D extension of the cell. The fluorescent spots corresponding to PE-labeled mTCRs
bound to peptide/MHC complexes on each Z-stack were summed up to obtain total counts per
individual cell. In each experiment epitopes were quantified on more than 18 individual
cells.
Lentivirus manufacture
A T150 flask of semi-confluent HEK293T cells was transfected with 15 µg of a
lentiviral vector encoding the TCR of interest, along with a total of 43 µg of 3
packaging plasmids, using the
Express-In Transfection Reagent (Open Biosystems/Thermo-Scientific). Supernatants were
collected 24 and 48 h later and were concentrated by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 16 h
at 4°C. Cell pellets were then resuspended in 2 mL of R10 culture medium and snap
frozen on dry ice until required.
T-cell transduction
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from venous blood freshly drawn
from healthy individuals. CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were
isolated using untouched CD8+ and CD4+ isolation kits
(Invitrogen/Life Technologies), as per manufacturer’s instructions, and incubated
overnight in R10 culture medium containing 50 U/mL human recombinant IL-2 (Peprotech) and
Dynabeads CTS antiCD3/CD28 beads (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) at a bead-to-cell ratio of
3 (1 × 106 cells/mL, 1 mL per well of a 24-well culture plate). Following
overnight stimulation, T cells were transduced by addition of 1 mL crude lentiviral
supernatant. T cells were then fed by addition of fresh medium (with IL-2) every other
day, and beads were removed on day 5. After 12 d, cells were cryopreserved at 2.51 ×
106 cells/mL until required. T-cell transduction efficiency was determined by
flow cytometry following incubation with PC7-conjugate anti-CD8 antibodies (BD PharMingen)
and either Vβ-specific antibodies (Beckman Coulter) or appropriate PE-conjugated
tetramers.
ELISPOT assays
The response of transduced T cells to peptide-pulsed T2 cells was determined by
IFNγ-specific ELISPOT kits (BD PharMingen), as per manufacturer’s
recommendations. Briefly, T2 cells were pulsed with TAA-derived peptides in concentrations
ranging from 10−7 to 10−12 M for 90 min, and
subsequently plated out at a concentration of 3 × 104 cells per well.
TCR-transduced T cells were defrosted and allowed to recover in R10 medium for 2 h, before
washing and plating at 5 × 103 viable transduced cells/well. Plates then
were incubated overnight (37°C and 5% CO2), developed according to
manufacturer’s instructions and evaluated on a Immunospot Series 4 ELISPOT Analyzer
(CTL).
Authors: Jonathan M Boulter; Meir Glick; Penio T Todorov; Emma Baston; Malkit Sami; Pierre Rizkallah; Bent K Jakobsen Journal: Protein Eng Date: 2003-09
Authors: Marco A Purbhoo; Deborah H Sutton; Joanna E Brewer; Rebecca E Mullings; Maxine E Hill; Tara M Mahon; Julia Karbach; Elke Jäger; Brian J Cameron; Nikolai Lissin; Paresh Vyas; Ji-Li Chen; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Bent K Jakobsen Journal: J Immunol Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Yi Li; Ruth Moysey; Peter E Molloy; Anne-Lise Vuidepot; Tara Mahon; Emma Baston; Steven Dunn; Nathaniel Liddy; Jansen Jacob; Bent K Jakobsen; Jonathan M Boulter Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2005-02-20 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Lisheng Ge; Neil T Hoa; Andrew N Cornforth; Daniela A Bota; Anthony Mai; Dong In Kim; Shiun-Kwei Chiou; Michelle J Hickey; Carol A Kruse; Martin R Jadus Journal: J Immunol Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Nathaniel Liddy; Giovanna Bossi; Katherine J Adams; Anna Lissina; Tara M Mahon; Namir J Hassan; Jessie Gavarret; Frayne C Bianchi; Nicholas J Pumphrey; Kristin Ladell; Emma Gostick; Andrew K Sewell; Nikolai M Lissin; Naomi E Harwood; Peter E Molloy; Yi Li; Brian J Cameron; Malkit Sami; Emma E Baston; Penio T Todorov; Samantha J Paston; Rebecca E Dennis; Jane V Harper; Steve M Dunn; Rebecca Ashfield; Andy Johnson; Yvonne McGrath; Gabriela Plesa; Carl H June; Michael Kalos; David A Price; Annelise Vuidepot; Daniel D Williams; Deborah H Sutton; Bent K Jakobsen Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Yolanda D Mahnke; Estelle Devevre; Petra Baumgaertner; Maurice Matter; Nathalie Rufer; Pedro Romero; Daniel E Speiser Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Marco A Purbhoo; Yi Li; Deborah H Sutton; Joanna E Brewer; Emma Gostick; Giovanna Bossi; Bruno Laugel; Ruth Moysey; Emma Baston; Nathaniel Liddy; Brian Cameron; Alan D Bennett; Rebecca Ashfield; Anita Milicic; David A Price; Brendan J Classon; Andrew K Sewell; Bent K Jakobsen Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Christel Devaud; Liza B John; Jennifer A Westwood; Phillip K Darcy; Michael H Kershaw Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Yuan Chen; Shao-An Xue; Shahriar Behboudi; Goran H Mohammad; Stephen P Pereira; Emma C Morris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Devin B Lowe; Camille K Bivens; Alexis S Mobley; Christian E Herrera; Amanda L McCormick; Timea Wichner; Manoj K Sabnani; Laurence M Wood; Jon A Weidanz Journal: MAbs Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Ellen K Wagner; Ahlam N Qerqez; Christopher A Stevens; Annalee W Nguyen; George Delidakis; Jennifer A Maynard Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Guozhu Xie; Nikola A Ivica; Bin Jia; Yingzhong Li; Han Dong; Yong Liang; Douglas Brown; Rizwan Romee; Jianzhu Chen Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: J A Atzin-Méndez; J S López-González; R Báez; M C Arenas-Del Angel; L F Montaño; D Silva-Adaya; R Lascurain; P Gorocica Journal: Oncol Rep Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.906