Literature DB >> 24482185

Cancer patients' function, symptoms and supportive care needs: a latent class analysis across cultures.

Jennifer Barsky Reese1, Amanda Blackford, Jonathan Sussman, Toru Okuyama, Tatsuo Akechi, Daryl Bainbridge, Doris Howell, Claire F Snyder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an umbrella term covering a range of outcomes, including symptoms, functioning, health-related quality of life, and supportive care needs. Research regarding the appropriate PRO questionnaires to use is informative. A previously published latent class analysis (LCA) examined patterns of function, symptoms, and supportive care needs in a sample of US cancer patients. The current analysis investigated whether the findings from the original study were replicated in new samples from different countries and whether a larger sample combining all the data would affect the classes identified.
METHODS: This secondary analysis of data from 408 Japanese and 189 Canadian cancer patients replicated the methods used in the original LCA using data from 117 US cancer patients. In all samples, subjects completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34). We first dichotomized individual function, symptom, and need domain scores. We then performed LCA to investigate the patterns of domains for each of the outcomes, both in the individual country samples and then combining the data from all three samples.
RESULTS: Across all analyses, class assignment was made by level of function, symptoms, or needs. In individual samples, only two-class models ("high" vs. "low") were generally identifiable while in the combined sample, three-class models ("high" vs. "moderate" vs. "low") best fit the data for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the level of burden experienced by patients was the key factor in defining classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24482185      PMCID: PMC4589252          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0629-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  B Bonevski; R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; L Burton; P Cook; A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Roxanne E Jensen; Gail Geller; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Sydney M Dy; Danetta E Hendricks; Julie R Brahmer; Michael A Carducci; Antonio C Wolff; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J).

Authors:  Toru Okuyama; Tatsuo Akechi; Hiroko Yamashita; Tatsuya Toyama; Chiharu Endo; Ryuichi Sagawa; Megumi Uchida; Toshiaki A Furukawa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Symptom clusters: the new frontier in symptom management research.

Authors:  Christine Miaskowski; Marylin Dodd; Kathryn Lee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

7.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Concordance of cancer patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Amanda L Blackford; Julie R Brahmer; Michael A Carducci; Roberto Pili; Vered Stearns; Antonio C Wolff; Sydney M Dy; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: how are they related?

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Julie R Brahmer; Michael A Carducci; Roberto Pili; Vered Stearns; Antonio C Wolff; Sydney M Dy; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Hickmann; Marlene Hechtner; Minou Nadji-Ohl; Mareile Janko; Ann Katrin Reuter; Karoline Kohlmann; Markus Haug; Sonja Grüninger; Monika Deininger; Oliver Ganslandt; Jochem König; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Jan Coburger; Mirjam Renovanz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Introduction to special section: quantitative methods.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The importance of face-to-face contact and reciprocal relationships and their associations with depressive symptoms and life satisfaction.

Authors:  Melissa Simone; Christian Geiser; Ginger Lockhart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Symptom Clusters in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model.

Authors:  Asha Mathew; Amit Jiwan Tirkey; Hongjin Li; Alana Steffen; Mark B Lockwood; Crystal L Patil; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.527

5.  Latent Class Analysis Reveals Distinct Subgroups of Patients Based on Symptom Occurrence and Demographic and Clinical Characteristics.

Authors:  Christine Miaskowski; Laura Dunn; Christine Ritchie; Steven M Paul; Bruce Cooper; Bradley E Aouizerat; Kimberly Alexander; Helen Skerman; Patsy Yates
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Congruence Between Latent Class and K-Modes Analyses in the Identification of Oncology Patients With Distinct Symptom Experiences.

Authors:  Nikoloas Papachristou; Payam Barnaghi; Bruce A Cooper; Xiao Hu; Roma Maguire; Kathi Apostolidis; Jo Armes; Yvette P Conley; Marilyn Hammer; Stylianos Katsaragakis; Kord M Kober; Jon D Levine; Lisa McCann; Elisabeth Patiraki; Steven M Paul; Emma Ream; Fay Wright; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Classifying Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain into Levels of Biopsychosocial Dysfunction Using Latent Class Modeling of Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Bradford W Fenton; Scott F Grey; Krystel Tossone; Michele McCarroll; Vivian E Von Gruenigen
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Trans-sectoral care in patients with colorectal cancer: Protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center trial Supportive Cancer Care Networkers (SCAN).

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Dirk Vordermark; Thomas Seufferlein; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Henning Dralle; Wilfried Mau; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Eva-Maria Fach; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.