Literature DB >> 24482028

Health literacy in vascular and interventional radiology: a comparative analysis of online patient education resources.

David R Hansberry1, Carl Kraus, Nitin Agarwal, Stephen R Baker, Sharon F Gonzales.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Internet is frequently accessed by patients as a resource for medical knowledge. However, the provided material is typically written at a level well above the recommended 7th grade level. A clear understanding of the capabilities, limitations, risks, and benefits of interventional radiology by patients, both current and prospective, is hindered when the textual information offered to the public is pitched at a level of sophistication too high for general comprehension.
METHODS: In January 2013, all 25 patient education resources from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE) Web site ( http://www.cirse.org ) and all 31 resources from the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Web site ( http://www.sirweb.org ) were analyzed for their specific level of readability using ten quantitative scales: Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning fog index, New Fog Count, Coleman-Liau index, FORCAST formula, Fry graph, Raygor Readability Estimate, and New Dale-Chall.
RESULTS: Collectively, the patient education resources on the CIRSE Web site are written at the 12.3 grade level, while the resources on the SIR Web site are written at the 14.5 grade level.
CONCLUSION: Educational health care materials available on both the CIRSE and the SIR Web sites are presented in language in the aggregate that could be too difficult for many lay people to fully understand. Given the complex nature of vascular and interventional radiology, it may be advantageous to rewrite these educational resources at a lower reading level to increase comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24482028     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0752-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D R Hansberry; N Agarwal; S F Gonzales; S R Baker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.

Authors:  David R Hansberry; Michael D'Angelo; Michael D White; Arpan V Prabhu; Mougnyan Cox; Nitin Agarwal; Sandeep Deshmukh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Evaluation of internet-based patient education materials from internal medicine subspecialty organizations: will patients understand them?

Authors:  David R Hansberry; Nitin Agarwal; Elizabeth S John; Ann M John; Prateek Agarwal; James C Reynolds; Stephen R Baker
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Colorectal cancer screening patient education materials-how effective is online health information?

Authors:  Elizabeth Sheena John; Ann M John; David R Hansberry; Prashant J Thomas; Prateek Agarwal; Christopher Deitch; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reading grade level and completeness of freely available materials on thyroid nodules: there is work to be done.

Authors:  J Aaron Barnes; Louise Davies
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.

Authors:  Sean-Tee J M Lim; Martin Kelly; Logeswaran Selvarajah; Michael Murray; Timothy Scanlon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  A Readability Analysis of Online Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Education Materials.

Authors:  Varun Ayyaswami; Divya Padmanabhan; Manthan Patel; Arpan Vaikunth Prabhu; David R Hansberry; Nitin Agarwal; Jared W Magnani
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-10

8.  Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language.

Authors:  Mohammad Alarifi; Abdulrahman M Jabour; Min Wu; Abdullah Aldosary; Mansour Almanaa; Jake Luo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.