Literature DB >> 24481710

Impact of electronic documentation on Pap screening rates in an urban health center.

Karishma Khullar1, Sarah Peitzmeier, Rachel Koffman, Jennifer Potter.   

Abstract

Providers and non-physician staff in primary care settings have reported barriers to full electronic health record (EHR) utilization. This study evaluates the effectiveness of EHR use for accurately documenting cervical cancer screening in a community healthcare setting, and proposes strategies to improve documentation. An electronic query generated data on average-risk patients aged 21-64 who had a medical visit at Fenway Health in 2012 and were overdue for a Papanicolaou (Pap) test according to the 2012 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines. We then conducted a manual review of these records to determine the accuracy of EHR documentation. Of a total 5,279 patients, the electronic query classified 2,982 (56.5%) as up-to-date (UTD) for a Pap and 2,297 patients (43.5%) as overdue. Upon manual review, 65 (2.2%) patients thought to be UTD were actually overdue. Of those 2,297 patients classified by the query as overdue, 816 (35.5%) were reclassified as UTD due to evidence of a recent Pap in their chart that was not extractable by electronic query and 208 (9.1%) were ineligible for a Pap; only 1,272 patients (55.4%) of the 2,297 classified by the query were truly overdue. The cervical cancer screening rate indicated by electronic query was 56.5 %; after manual review, the adjusted rate was 73.6%. Overall, 1,090 patients (20.6%) were misclassified by the query. Inefficient EHR use can have serious implications for clinical practice and performance measures. Primary care practices need to develop mechanisms to capture outside medical records and create a team-based approach to facilitate accurate EHR documentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481710     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-014-9822-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  19 in total

1.  The value of electronic health records in community health centers: policy implications.

Authors:  Robert H Miller; Christopher E West
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Gina Agarwal; Alice Lytwyn
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Electronic health records and the increasing complexity of medical practice: "it never gets easier, you just go faster".

Authors:  Rebecca G Mishuris; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  An audit of dermatopathology requisitions: hand written vs. electronic medical record data entry accuracy.

Authors:  Christopher L Kinonen; William G Watkin; Briana C Gleason; Charnell E J Johnson; Antoinette B Thomas; Thomas L Cibull
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.587

6.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Mark H Einstein; Warner K Huh; Hormuzd A Katki; Walter K Kinney; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Electronic medical records are not associated with improved documentation in community primary care practices.

Authors:  Karissa A Hahn; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Deborah J Cohen; Alicja K Piasecki; Jesse C Crosson; Elizabeth C Clark; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term Pap smear.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Brittany M Weber; Kenneth E Fletcher
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2004-10

9.  Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, unaffiliated, community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  Jenna Howard; Elizabeth C Clark; Asia Friedman; Jesse C Crosson; Maria Pellerano; Benjamin F Crabtree; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Carlos R Jaen; Douglas S Bell; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring.

Authors:  Amanda Parsons; Colleen McCullough; Jason Wang; Sarah Shih
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care via Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing: A Multi-PBRN Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Christopher P Morley; Laura A Schad; Laurene M Tumiel-Berhalter; Laura A Brady; Alexandrea Bentham; Karen Vitale; Amanda Norton; Gary Noronha; Carlos Swanger
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2021-10-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.