Literature DB >> 23519301

2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

L Stewart Massad1, Mark H Einstein, Warner K Huh, Hormuzd A Katki, Walter K Kinney, Mark Schiffman, Diane Solomon, Nicolas Wentzensen, Herschel W Lawson.   

Abstract

A group of 47 experts representing 23 professional societies, national and international health organizations, and federal agencies met in Bethesda, MD, September 14-15, 2012, to revise the 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Consensus Guidelines. The group's goal was to provide revised evidence-based consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) following adoption of cervical cancer screening guidelines incorporating longer screening intervals and co-testing. In addition to literature review, data from almost 1.4 million women in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Plan provided evidence on risk after abnormal tests. Where data were available, guidelines prescribed similar management for women with similar risks for CIN 3, AIS, and cancer. Most prior guidelines were reaffirmed. Examples of updates include: Human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results are followed with co-testing at 3 years before return to routine screening and are not sufficient for exiting women from screening at age 65 years; women aged 21-24 years need less invasive management, especially for minor abnormalities; postcolposcopy management strategies incorporate co-testing; endocervical sampling reported as CIN 1 should be managed as CIN 1; unsatisfactory cytology should be repeated in most circumstances, even when HPV results from co-testing are known, while most cases of negative cytology with absent or insufficient endocervical cells or transformation zone component can be managed without intensive follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519301     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  187 in total

1.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope.

Authors:  Jenna L Mueller; Elizabeth Asma; Christopher T Lam; Marlee S Krieger; Jennifer E Gallagher; Alaattin Erkanli; Roopa Hariprasad; J S Malliga; Lisa C Muasher; Bariki Mchome; Olola Oneko; Peyton Taylor; Gino Venegas; Anthony Wanyoro; Ravi Mehrotra; John W Schmitt; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Cervical cytology screening among low-income, minority adolescents in New York City following the 2009 ACOG guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Annika M Hofstetter; Karen Soren
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Xiaonan Xue; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Development of Algorithms for Automated Detection of Cervical Pre-Cancers With a Low-Cost, Point-of-Care, Pocket Colposcope.

Authors:  Mercy Nyamewaa Asiedu; Anish Simhal; Usamah Chaudhary; Jenna L Mueller; Christopher T Lam; John W Schmitt; Gino Venegas; Guillermo Sapiro; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Testing and genotyping of high-risk human papillomavirus by the cobas HPV Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 high-risk HPV DNA test using cervical and vaginal samples.

Authors:  Michael T Pyne; Christian Law; David R Hillyard; Robert Schlaberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia After Negative Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Laura James-Nywening; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Nicole G Campos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  From cancer screening to treatment: service delivery and referral in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Vivien Hanson; Gale D Johnson; Janet E Royalty; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Triage of ASC-H: A meta-analysis of the accuracy of high-risk HPV testing and other markers to detect cervical precancer.

Authors:  Lan Xu; Freija Verdoodt; Nicolas Wentzensen; Christine Bergeron; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.