Literature DB >> 24480686

Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.

Gabriel Halát1, Lukas Negrin2, Thomas Koch2, Jochen Erhart2, Patrick Platzer2, Stefan Hajdu2, Johannes Streicher2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine strength and failure characteristics of 2 suture anchors used to repair simulated flexor digitorum profundus avulsions during passive mobilization protocol simulation.
METHODS: We simulated avulsion of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon in 30 distal phalanges from fresh-frozen human cadavers. Repair was performed with a 1.3 × 3.7 mm Micro-Mitek suture anchor (3-0 Orthocord suture) and a 2.2 × 4.0-mm Corkscrew suture anchor (2-0 FiberWire suture). All specimens were loaded cyclically from 2 to 15 N at 5 N/s for a total of 500 cycles. Samples were tested to failure at the completion of 500 cycles. Load at failure, load at first noteworthy displacement (> 2 mm), elongation of the system, gap formation at the tendon-bone interface, and the mechanism of failure were assessed.
RESULTS: Suture failure at maximum load was the prevalent failure mechanism in both groups. No statistically significant difference in elongation of the tendon-suture complex was observed. The Corkscrew suture anchor showed a significantly superior performance in load to failure, load at first significant displacement, and gap formation at the tendon-bone interface.
CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher load capacity at first displacement (> 2 mm) and the significance of a lower gap formation at the repair site seem to be the most relevant clinical parameters. Based on this concept, the Corkscrew anchor may be superior biomechanically to the Micro-Mitek when considering an early passive mobilization protocol. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The choice of an appropriate implant may influence the postoperative mobilization protocol and thereby improve currently reported success rates. Defining a biomechanically superior implant will provide an essential basis for further studies in flexor tendon repair research.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexor digitorum profundus tendon avulsion; Jersey finger; flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair; suture anchor biomechanics; suture anchor design

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480686     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion Repair.

Authors:  Jill G Putnam; Damon Adamany
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-04-22

Review 2.  A review of mallet finger and jersey finger injuries in the athlete.

Authors:  Abdo Bachoura; Alex J Ferikes; John D Lubahn
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

3.  Four Anchor Repair of Jersey Finger.

Authors:  Adrian C Kong; Alex Kitto; Dimas E Pineda; Roberto A Miki; Daniel T Alfonso; Israel Alfonso
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021-12

4.  Introduction of a new repair technique in bony avulsion of the FDP tendon: A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gabriel Halát; Lukas L Negrin; Ewald Unger; Thomas Koch; Johannes Streicher; Jochen Erhart; Patrick Platzer; Stefan Hajdu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.