Literature DB >> 24480454

Singing with yourself: evidence for an inverse modeling account of poor-pitch singing.

Peter Q Pfordresher1, James T Mantell2.   

Abstract

Singing is a ubiquitous and culturally significant activity that humans engage in from an early age. Nevertheless, some individuals - termed poor-pitch singers - are unable to match target pitches within a musical semitone while singing. In the experiments reported here, we tested whether poor-pitch singing deficits would be reduced when individuals imitate recordings of themselves as opposed to recordings of other individuals. This prediction was based on the hypothesis that poor-pitch singers have not developed an abstract "inverse model" of the auditory-vocal system and instead must rely on sensorimotor associations that they have experienced directly, which is true for sequences an individual has already produced. In three experiments, participants, both accurate and poor-pitch singers, were better able to imitate sung recordings of themselves than sung recordings of other singers. However, this self-advantage was enhanced for poor-pitch singers. These effects were not a byproduct of self-recognition (Experiment 1), vocal timbre (Experiment 2), or the absolute pitch of target recordings (i.e., the advantage remains when recordings are transposed, Experiment 3). Results support the conceptualization of poor-pitch singing as an imitative deficit resulting from a deficient inverse model of the auditory-vocal system with respect to pitch.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse models; Poor-pitch singing; Vocal imitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480454     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  A Dual-Stream Neuroanatomy of Singing.

Authors:  Psyche Loui
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2015-02

2.  Effects of intention in the imitation of sung and spoken pitch.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; James T Mantell; Tim A Pruitt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-05-20

3.  On drawing a line through the spectrogram: how do we understand deficits of vocal pitch imitation?

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Pauline Larrouy-Maestri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Olivier Houix; Frédéric Voisin; Nicolas Misdariis; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Are We in Time? How Predictive Coding and Dynamical Systems Explain Musical Synchrony.

Authors:  Caroline Palmer; Alexander P Demos
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-04-06

6.  Effects of Visual and Auditory Feedback in Violin and Singing Voice Pitch Matching Tasks.

Authors:  Angel David Blanco; Simone Tassani; Rafael Ramirez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-08

7.  Making and monitoring errors based on altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Robertson T E Beasley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-20

8.  Moving to the Beat and Singing are Linked in Humans.

Authors:  Simone Dalla Bella; Magdalena Berkowska; Jakub Sowiński
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Poor neuro-motor tuning of the human larynx: a comparison of sung and whistled pitch imitation.

Authors:  Michel Belyk; Joseph F Johnson; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.