Literature DB >> 24478613

Early Screening for Risk of Reading Disabilities: Recommendations for a Four-Step Screening System.

Jennifer K Gilbert1, Donald L Compton1, Douglas Fuchs1, Lynn S Fuchs1.   

Abstract

Response-to-intervention (RTI) models incorporate a screening process to identify students who appear to be at risk for learning disabilities (LDs). The purpose of this position article is to incorporate what is known about screening into a flexible, yet comprehensive screening system to help school psychologists and other school administrators in establishing school-specific screening procedures. The authors begin by discussing past. research on screening for reading disabilities (RDs) within the RTI framework. Then, they propose a four-step screening system advocating a short screener (Step I), progress monitoring (Step 2), follow-up testing (Step 3), and ongoing revision of procedures and cut scores (Step 4). Their goal is to improve screening within RTI systems with practical procedures to permit schools to implement state-of-the-art screening batteries that accurately and efficiently distinguish students who are at high risk for RD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  reading disabilities; response-to-intervention; screening

Year:  2012        PMID: 24478613      PMCID: PMC3903290          DOI: 10.1177/1534508412451491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assess Eff Interv        ISSN: 1534-5084


  5 in total

1.  Indexing response to intervention: a longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade.

Authors:  Deborah C Simmons; Michael D Coyne; Oi-man Kwok; Sarah McDonagh; Beth A Ham; Edward J Kame'enui
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

2.  Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning in Predicting Third Graders' Development of Mathematical Problem Solving.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Donald L Compton; Douglas Fuchs; Kurstin N Hollenbeck; Caitlin F Craddock; Carol L Hamlett
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2008-11

Review 3.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process.

Authors:  Donald L Compton; Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Bobette Bouton; Jennifer K Gilbert; Laura A Barquero; Eunsoo Cho; Robert C Crouch
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2010-05-01

5.  The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: implications for RTI frameworks.

Authors:  Douglas Fuchs; Donald L Compton; Lynn S Fuchs; Bobette Bouton; Erin Caffrey
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2011-06-17
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Response to Instruction in Preschool: Results of Two Randomized Studies with Children At Significant Risk of Reading Difficulties.

Authors:  Christopher J Lonigan; Beth M Phillips
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-07-06

2.  The Effect of Reading Duration on the Reliability and Validity of Middle School Students' ORF Performance.

Authors:  Amy E Barth; Karla K Stuebing; Jack M Fletcher; Carolyn A Denton; Sharon Vaughn; David Francis
Journal:  Assess Eff Interv       Date:  2014-12

3.  Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia.

Authors:  Olga V C A Andrade; Paulo E Andrade; Simone A Capellini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.