Literature DB >> 20689725

Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process.

Donald L Compton1, Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S Fuchs, Bobette Bouton, Jennifer K Gilbert, Laura A Barquero, Eunsoo Cho, Robert C Crouch.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (a) to identify measures that when added to a base 1(st)-grade screening battery help eliminate false positives and (b) to investigate gains in efficiency associated with a 2-stage gated screening procedure. We tested 355 children in the fall of 1(st) grade, and assessed for reading difficulty at the end of 2(nd) grade. The base screening model, included measures of phonemic awareness, rapid naming skill, oral vocabulary, and initial word identification fluency (WIF). Short-term WIF progress monitoring (intercept and slope), dynamic assessment, running records, and oral reading fluency were each considered as an additional screening measure in contrasting models. Results indicated that the addition of WIF progress monitoring and dynamic assessment, but not running records or oral reading fluency, significantly decreased false positives. The 2-stage gated screening process using phonemic decoding efficiency in the first stage significantly reduced the number of children requiring the full screening battery.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689725      PMCID: PMC2913521          DOI: 10.1037/a0018448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0663


  9 in total

1.  The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption.

Authors:  Christopher Schatschneider; Richard K Wagner; Elizabeth C Crawford
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2008

2.  Retrospective analyses of the reading development of grade 4 students with reading disabilities: risk status and profiles over 5 years.

Authors:  Orly Lipka; Nonie K Lesaux; Linda S Siegel
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

3.  Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes.

Authors:  Alysia D Roehrig; Yaacov Petscher; Stephen M Nettles; Roxanne F Hudson; Joseph K Torgesen
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2007-07-19

4.  The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-04

5.  Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  R K Wagner; J K Torgesen; C A Rashotte; S A Hecht; T A Barker; S R Burgess; J Donahue; T Garon
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-05

6.  Assisted assessment: a taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  J C Campione
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1989-03

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Early identification of dyslexia: Evidence from a follow-up study of speech-language impaired children.

Authors:  H W Catts
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1991-01

9.  Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities.

Authors:  Hugh W Catts; Yaacov Petscher; Christopher Schatschneider; Mindy Sittner Bridges; Katherin Mendoza
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008-12-19
  9 in total
  23 in total

1.  Multifactorial pathways facilitate resilience among kindergarteners at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal behavioral and neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Jennifer Zuk; Jade Dunstan; Elizabeth Norton; Xi Yu; Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Yingying Wang; Tiffany P Hogan; John D E Gabrieli; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-05-21

2.  First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.

Authors:  Douglas Fuchs; Donald L Compton; Lynn S Fuchs; V Joan Bryant; Carol L Hamlett; Warren Lambert
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012 May-Jun

Review 3.  Responsiveness-to-intervention: a decade later.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012 May-Jun

4.  Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development.

Authors:  Rebecca O Zumeta; Donald L Compton; Lynn S Fuchs
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  2012-01

5.  Smart RTI: A Next-Generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention.

Authors:  Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Donald L Compton
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  2012

6.  Predicting First Graders' Development of Calculation versus Word-Problem Performance: The Role of Dynamic Assessment.

Authors:  Pamela M Seethaler; Lynn S Fuchs; Douglas Fuchs; Donald L Compton
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2012-02

7.  Relations Among Oral Reading Fluency, Silent Reading Fluency, and Reading Comprehension: A Latent Variable Study of First-Grade Readers.

Authors:  Richard K Wagner
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2011-07

8.  Is "Response/No Response" Too Simple a Notion for RTI Frameworks? Exploring Multiple Response Types With Latent Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Eunsoo Cho; Amy M Elleman; Devin M Kearns; Samuel Patton; Donald L Compton
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2020-07-04

9.  Influences of Neural Pathway Integrity on Children's Response to Reading Instruction.

Authors:  Nicole Davis; Qiuyun Fan; Donald L Compton; Doug Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Laurie E Cutting; John C Gore; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-29

10.  Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention.

Authors:  Eunsoo Cho; Donald L Compton; Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Bobette Bouton
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.