Literature DB >> 24477765

Response speed advantage for vision does not extend to touch in early deaf adults.

Benedetta Heimler1, Francesco Pavani.   

Abstract

Early deaf adults typically respond faster than hearing controls when performing a speeded simple detection on visual targets. Whether this response time advantage can generalise to another intact modality (touch) or it is instead specific to visual processing remained unexplored. We tested eight early deaf adults and twelve hearing controls in a simple detection task, with visual or tactile targets delivered on the arms and occupying the same locations in external space. Catch trials were included in the experimental paradigm. Results revealed a response time advantage in deaf adults compared to hearing controls, selectively for visual targets. This advantage did not extend to touch. The number of anticipation errors was negligible and comparable in both groups. The present findings strengthen the notion that response time advantage in deaf adults emerges as a consequence of changes specific to visual processing. They also exclude the involvement of sensory-unspecific cognitive mechanisms in this improvement (e.g. increased impulsivity in initiation of response, longer-lasting sustained attention or higher motivation to perform the task). Finally, they provide initial evidence that the intact sensory modalities can reorganise independently from each other following early auditory deprivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477765     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3852-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Organization and reorganization of sensory-deprived cortex.

Authors:  Patrice Voss; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Measures of tactual detection and temporal order resolution in congenitally deaf and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Theodore M Moallem; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ming Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult.

Authors:  S Levänen; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Hearing shapes our perception of time: temporal discrimination of tactile stimuli in deaf people.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Carlo Cecchetto; Carlo Geraci; Angelo Maravita; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Costanza Papagno
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Visual movement perception in deaf and hearing individuals.

Authors:  Nadine Hauthal; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Jeremy D Thorne
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?

Authors:  Costanza Papagno; Carlo Cecchetto; Alberto Pisoni; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visuo-tactile interactions in the congenitally deaf: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Nadine Hauthal; Stefan Debener; Stefan Rach; Pascale Sandmann; Jeremy D Thorne
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21

3.  Deafness alters the spatial mapping of touch.

Authors:  Andréanne Sharp; Simon P Landry; Maxime Maheu; François Champoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Importance of Intact Senses in Mating and Social Assessments Made by Deaf Individuals.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Paulina Idziak; Marta Rokosz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 5.  Body Perception and Action Following Deafness.

Authors:  M S Houde; S P Landry; S Pagé; M Maheu; F Champoux
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.