Literature DB >> 16859649

Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.

Qi Chen1, Ming Zhang, Xiaolin Zhou.   

Abstract

This study explored the interaction between the spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) and different levels of flanker interference in congenitally deaf subjects as compared with hearing subjects. Color (Experiment 1) and alphanumeric (Experiment 2) flanker interference effects were differentiated into the pre-response and the response levels. The spatial distribution of attention was manipulated through IOR. Subjects were asked to either make color or letter/digit discriminations to the central targets or detect the abrupt-onset peripheral targets. Deaf subjects were significantly faster than hearing subjects at detecting peripheral targets irrespective of the cue validity, while the two groups had comparable sizes of IOR. In the central discrimination tasks, deaf subjects showed significant response level, but not pre-response level, flanker effects irrespective of the type of stimuli and the spatial location of the flanker. For hearing subjects, however, spatial attention interacted with the pre-response and response flanker effects in different ways. While flankers at the cued location caused interference effects at the response level and facilitatory effects at the pre-response level, those at the uncued location caused different effects depending on the type of stimuli. Moreover, increasing the peripheral attention for hearing subjects, by increasing the proportion of peripheral detection trials, made hearing subjects behave like deaf subjects. These results demonstrate that deaf people possess enhanced peripheral attentional resources as compared with hearing people. The spatial distribution of attention modulates mainly the resolution of the pre-response flanker interference in hearing people, but affects neither the pre-response nor the response level interference in deaf people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16859649     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  17 in total

1.  Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults.

Authors:  Srikant Jayaraman; Raymond M Klein; Matthew D Hilchey; Gouri Shanker Patil; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Zhenzhu Yue; Ming Zhang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer; William G Kronenberger; Alexandra Trani
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-07-03

4.  Response speed advantage for vision does not extend to touch in early deaf adults.

Authors:  Benedetta Heimler; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Don't Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Allan Paivio; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2016-06-02

6.  Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals.

Authors:  John R Iversen; Aniruddh D Patel; Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-11-19

8.  Are Deaf Students Visual Learners?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Carolyn Morrison; Jennifer Lukomski; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  Effects of deafness and sign language experience on the human brain: voxel-based and surface-based morphometry.

Authors:  Stephen McCullough; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.