Guan Xu1, Zhuo-Xian Meng, Jiandie D Lin, Jie Yuan, Paul L Carson, Bhuwan Joshi, Xueding Wang. 1. From the Department of Radiology (G.X., P.L.C., B.J., X.W.) and Life Sciences Institute and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology (Z.X.M., J.D.L.), University of Michigan, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (J.Y.).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of photoacoustic (PA) spectrum analysis (PASA) to identify microstructural changes corresponding to fat accumulation in mouse livers ex vivo and in situ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The laboratory animal protocol for this work was approved by the university committee on use and care of animals. Six mice with normal livers and six mice with fatty livers were examined ex vivo with a PA system at 1200 nm, and nine similar pairs of mice were examined at 532 nm. To explore the feasibility of this technique for future study in an in vivo mouse model, an additional pair of normal and fatty mouse livers was scanned in situ with an ultrasonographic (US) and PA dual-modality imaging system. The PA signals acquired were analyzed by using the proposed PASA method. Results of the groups were compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: Prominent differences between the PASA parameters from the fatty and normal mouse livers were observed. The analysis of the PASA parameters from six normal and six fatty mouse livers indicates that there are differences of up to 5 standard deviations between the PASA parameters of the normal livers and those of the fatty livers at 1200 nm; for parameters from nine normal and nine fatty mouse livers at 532 nm, the differences were approximately 2 standard deviations (P < .05) for each PASA parameter. CONCLUSION: The results supported our hypothesis that the PASA allows quantitative identification of the microstructural changes that differentiate normal from fatty livers. Compared with that at 532 nm, PASA at 1200 nm is more reliable for fatty liver diagnosis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. RSNA, 2014
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of photoacoustic (PA) spectrum analysis (PASA) to identify microstructural changes corresponding to fat accumulation in mouse livers ex vivo and in situ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The laboratory animal protocol for this work was approved by the university committee on use and care of animals. Six mice with normal livers and six mice with fatty livers were examined ex vivo with a PA system at 1200 nm, and nine similar pairs of mice were examined at 532 nm. To explore the feasibility of this technique for future study in an in vivo mouse model, an additional pair of normal and fatty mouse livers was scanned in situ with an ultrasonographic (US) and PA dual-modality imaging system. The PA signals acquired were analyzed by using the proposed PASA method. Results of the groups were compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: Prominent differences between the PASA parameters from the fatty and normal mouse livers were observed. The analysis of the PASA parameters from six normal and six fatty mouse livers indicates that there are differences of up to 5 standard deviations between the PASA parameters of the normal livers and those of the fatty livers at 1200 nm; for parameters from nine normal and nine fatty mouse livers at 532 nm, the differences were approximately 2 standard deviations (P < .05) for each PASA parameter. CONCLUSION: The results supported our hypothesis that the PASA allows quantitative identification of the microstructural changes that differentiate normal from fatty livers. Compared with that at 532 nm, PASA at 1200 nm is more reliable for fatty liver diagnosis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. RSNA, 2014
Authors: R L P van Veen; H J C M Sterenborg; A Pifferi; A Torricelli; E Chikoidze; R Cubeddu Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: C R Meyer; D S Herron; P L Carson; R A Banjavic; G A Thieme; F L Bookstein; M L Johnson Journal: Ultrason Imaging Date: 1984-01 Impact factor: 1.578
Authors: Mark L Palmeri; Michael H Wang; Ned C Rouze; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; Barry Moser; Anna Mae Diehl; Kathryn R Nightingale Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Han-Wei Wang; Ning Chai; Pu Wang; Song Hu; Wei Dou; David Umulis; Lihong V Wang; Michael Sturek; Robert Lucht; Ji-Xin Cheng Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: L Gortzak-Uzan; W Jimenez; S Nofech-Mozes; N Ismiil; M A Khalifa; V Dubé; B Rosen; J Murphy; S Laframboise; A Covens Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ting Feng; Kenneth M Kozloff; Chao Tian; Joseph E Perosky; Yi-Sing Hsiao; Sidan Du; Jie Yuan; Cheri X Deng; Xueding Wang Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Guan Xu; Mandy C Davis; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A Tomlins; Shengsong Huang; Lakshmi P Kunju; John T Wei; Xueding Wang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Hao Lei; Laura A Johnson; Shengchun Liu; David S Moons; Teng Ma; Qifa Zhou; Michael D Rice; Jun Ni; Xueding Wang; Peter D R Higgins; Guan Xu Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ting Feng; Joseph E Perosky; Kenneth M Kozloff; Guan Xu; Qian Cheng; Sidan Du; Jie Yuan; Cheri X Deng; Xueding Wang Journal: Opt Express Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.894