Literature DB >> 24475837

Normal diastolic and systolic myocardial T1 values at 1.5-T MR imaging: correlations and blood normalization.

Ursula Reiter1, Gert Reiter, Katrin Dorr, Andreas Greiser, Ralph Maderthaner, Michael Fuchsjäger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce blood normalization for myocardial T1 values at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to evaluate regional differences between systolic and diastolic myocardial T1 values in healthy subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identification number, NCT01728597) was approved by the institutional review board, and volunteer informed consent was obtained. Forty healthy subjects (20 women; age range, 20-35 years) underwent electrocardiographically gated 1.5-T MR imaging. A modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence was used to acquire myocardial T1 maps in systole and diastole. Regional T1 values were evaluated in 16 myocardial segments; blood T1 was derived from the blood pool in the center of the left ventricular cavity. Linear regression slopes between myocardial and blood T1 values were used to normalize myocardial T1 to the mean blood T1 of the study population. Mean T1 values were compared by using the t test, with P < .05 considered to indicate a significant difference.
RESULTS: Mean myocardial T1 (984 msec ± 28 [standard deviation] in diastole, 959 msec ± 21 in systole) and all segmental T1 values between diastole and systole differed significantly (P < .001). Blood T1 correlated well with segmental myocardial T1 (R = 0.73 for diastole, R = 0.72 for systole). After normalization to blood T1, significant sex differences in myocardial T1 disappeared and variances in mean myocardial T1 decreased. Blood-normalized diastolic and systolic myocardial T1 values correlated strongly with each other on segmental (r = 0.72) and global (r = 0.89) levels. Subregional myocardial T1 distribution characteristics in diastole were similar to those in systole.
CONCLUSION: In normal myocardium, diastolic and systolic myocardial T1 values differ significantly but correlate strongly. Blood normalization eliminates sex differences in myocardial T1 values and reduces their variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24475837     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in diastolic and systolic phase.

Authors:  Carlo Tessa; Stefano Diciotti; Nicholas Landini; Alessio Lilli; Jacopo Del Meglio; Luca Salvatori; Marco Giannelli; Andreas Greiser; Claudio Vignali; Giancarlo Casolo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Myocardial T1 values in healthy volunteers measured with saturation method using adaptive recovery times for T1 mapping (SMART1Map) at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Shunsuke Matsumoto; Shigeo Okuda; Yoshitake Yamada; Tatsuya Suzuki; Akihiro Tanimoto; Atsushi Nozaki; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Accurate and robust systolic myocardial T1 mapping using saturation recovery with individualized delay time: comparison with diastolic T1 mapping.

Authors:  Hideo Arai; Masateru Kawakubo; Kenichi Sanui; Hiroshi Nishimura; Toshiaki Kadokami
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-24

4.  Inverse association of MRI-derived native myocardial T1 and perfusion reserve index in women with evidence of ischemia and no obstructive CAD: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jaime L Shaw; Michael D Nelson; Janet Wei; Manish Motwani; Sofy Landes; Puja K Mehta; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li; C Noel Bairey Merz; Behzad Sharif
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Cardiac MR imaging to probe tissue composition of the heart by using T1 mapping.

Authors:  Puskar Pattanayak; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  T1 and T2 mapping in the identification of acute myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI.

Authors:  Carlo Tessa; Jacopo Del Meglio; Alessio Lilli; Stefano Diciotti; Luca Salvatori; Marco Giannelli; Andreas Greiser; Claudio Vignali; Giancarlo Casolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Pooled summary of native T1 value and extracellular volume with MOLLI variant sequences in normal subjects and patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ha Q Vo; Thomas H Marwick; Kazuaki Negishi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Temporally resolved parametric assessment of Z-magnetization recovery (TOPAZ): Dynamic myocardial T1 mapping using a cine steady-state look-locker approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Chetan Shenoy; Benedikt Rieger; Lothar R Schad; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Evaluation of Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery and Arrhythmia-Insensitive Rapid Cardiac T1 Mapping Pulse Sequences in Cardiomyopathy Patients.

Authors:  Sean Robison; KyungPyo Hong; Daniel Kim; Rachel Lloyd; Jay Ramchand; Emma Hornsey; Piyush Srivastava; Gerard Smith; Leighton Kearney; Ruth Lim
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.