| Literature DB >> 24475137 |
Chun-An Chen1, Meng-Yao Lu1, Shinn-Forng Peng2, Kai-Hsin Lin1, Hsiu-Hao Chang1, Yung-Li Yang1, Shiann-Tarng Jou1, Dong-Tsamn Lin1, Yen-Bin Liu3, Herng-Er Horng4, Hong-Chang Yang5, Jou-Kou Wang1, Mei-Hwan Wu1, Chau-Chung Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia major (TM) are at risk for myocardial iron overload and cardiac complications. Spatial repolarization heterogeneity is known to be elevated in patients with certain cardiac diseases, but little is known in TM patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate spatial repolarization heterogeneity in patients with TM, and to investigate the relationships between spatial repolarization heterogeneity, cardiac iron load, and adverse cardiac events. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24475137 PMCID: PMC3903540 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Construction of a QTc contour map from magnetocardiography (MCG).
Signals from 64-channel MCG traces before averaging, and the construction of repolarization map with a 21×21 resolution by signal-averaged vector-projected electrocardiogram (A). The spatial distribution of corrected QT (QTc) intervals was displayed on a QTc contour map (B).
Patient characteristics.
| Mean±standard deviation or median (25th–75th percentile) | |
| Age (years) | 24.5±6.1 |
| Male sex n (%) | 24 (48) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.2±2.9 |
| History of diabetes mellitus n (%) | 7 (14) |
| Systolic/diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 101±12/65±9 |
| Transfusional blood volume (mL/year) | 13250 (11500–16250) |
| Pretransfusion hemoglobin (g/dL) | 10.2±1.2 |
| Serum ferritin (ng/mL) | 2002 (1357–3726) |
| CMR measures | |
| Cardiac T2 | 27.9 (10.1–40.2) |
| LV end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2) | 84.4 (75.4–100.1) |
| LV end-systolic volume index (mL/m2) | 26.0 (20.8–32.3) |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 70.0 (64.0–73.0) |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 72.8 (65.6–84.2) |
| Adverse cardiac events n (%) | 10 (20) |
| Heart failure n (%) | 4 (8) |
| Arrhythmia n (%) | 9 (18) |
| Atrial tachycardia | 6 |
| Atrial fibrillation and flutter | 1 |
| Combined ventricular and atrial tachycardia | 1 |
| Second-degree Morbitz type II AV block | 1 |
n = 33;
n = 47.
AV = atrioventricular; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; LV = left ventricular.
Magnetocardiography-derived parameters in patients with patients with thalassemia major and control subjects.
| Patients (n = 50) | Controls (n = 55) | p | |
| Mean QTc interval (ms) | 396±30 | 382±22 | 0.006 |
| SI-QTc | 9.8±2.5 | 7.3±1.4 | <0.001 |
| SD-QTc (ms) | 20.8±5.6 | 15.5±3.4 | <0.001 |
| QTc dispersion (ms) | 91.3±16.0 | 77.8±10.0 | <0.001 |
QTc = corrected QT interval; SI-QTc = smooth index of corrected QT intervals; SD-QTc = standard deviation of corrected QT intervals.
Figure 2Comparisons of mean QTc interval (A), SI-QTc (B), SD-QTc (C), and QTc dispersion (D) in patients and controls.
Patients were further divided into those with normal cardiac T2* value (≥20 ms) and those with abnormal cardiac T2* value (<20 ms). QTc = corrected QT interval; SI-QTc = smooth index of corrected QT intervals; SD-QTc = standard deviation of corrected QT intervals.
Figure 3Correlations between SI-QTc (A), SD-QTc (B), QTc dispersion (C) and loge cardiac T2* value.
QTc = corrected QT interval; SI-QTc = smooth index of corrected QT intervals; SD-QTc = standard deviation of corrected QT intervals.
Figure 4ROC curves of SI-QTc (A), SD-QTc (B), QTc dispersion (C), and cardiac T2* (D) for predicting the presence of adverse cardiac events.
The optimal cut-off value (labeled as the black dot on the ROC curve), sensitivity, and specificity of each individual parameter are shown. Data in the parenthesis indicate 95% confidence interval of the area under curve (AUC). QTc = corrected QT interval; SI-QTc = smooth index of corrected QT intervals; SD-QTc = standard deviation of corrected QT intervals.