Literature DB >> 24474417

[Foreign body retention after soft tissue laceration. A case of insufficient inspection and documentation].

L Kempf1, K F Braun, J Neu.   

Abstract

A 52-year-old man sustained a laceration to his left eyebrow after a fall in his bathroom. His plastic glasses shattered upon impact. The patient was referred to a local emergency department. After a quick exploration by the physician on call, the wound was closed by a nurse using the Steri-Strip Wound Closure system. No further exploration or imaging was performed. Four weeks after the incident the patient presented to a dermatologist with a "foreign body sensation" at the site of the laceration. Assuming a foreign body granuloma, he was referred to a maxillofacial surgeon who removed plastic debris (parts of the glasses worn by the patient). The wound subsequently healed without further complications.The patient filed a complaint for inadequate treatment in the emergency department. No detailed patient and accident history had been obtained, the wound exploration performed by the physician was superficial, and the wound closure was performed by a nurse. The expert opinion of the arbitration board ascertained a medical malpractice in terms of insufficient history, examination, and a lack of documentation. Specific questioning of the accident history would have led to the suspicion of possible foreign bodies, thus, leading to a more thorough exploration and likely further imaging. The arbitration board concluded that obtaining a detailed accident history and an accurate examination would have revealed the foreign bodies and/or led to further imaging. Complying with this, the patient could have been spared further harm and secondary surgery would have been unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474417     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-013-2535-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  10 in total

1.  US of soft-tissue foreign bodies and associated complications with surgical correlation.

Authors:  T D Boyse; D P Fessell; J A Jacobson; J Lin; M T van Holsbeeck; C W Hayes
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Splinter removal.

Authors:  Christina Chan; Gohar A Salam
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  The utility of routine x-rays in all glass-caused wounds.

Authors:  Michael Orlinsky; Aaron A Bright
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Clinical characteristics and management of wound foreign bodies in the ED.

Authors:  Matthew R Levine; Stephen M Gorman; Christian F Young; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Radiographic screening for glass foreign bodies--what does a "negative" foreign body series really mean?

Authors:  B J Courter
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  Soft tissue foreign bodies.

Authors:  R L Lammers
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign bodies in the hand.

Authors:  M A Anderson; W L Newmeyer; E S Kilgore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography.

Authors:  W E Shiels; D S Babcock; J L Wilson; R A Burch
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Peterson; Laura W Bancroft; Mark J Kransdorf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Retained glass foreign bodies in wounds: predictive value of wound characteristics, patient perception, and wound exploration.

Authors:  M T Steele; L V Tran; W A Watson; R L Muelleman
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.469

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.

Authors:  R Javadrashid; D F Fouladi; M Golamian; P Hajalioghli; M H Daghighi; Z Shahmorady; M T Niknejad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.419

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.