Literature DB >> 2393187

Radiographic screening for glass foreign bodies--what does a "negative" foreign body series really mean?

B J Courter1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to provide percentages of radiographic detection of small glass foreign bodies and to compare the detection rates (sensitivity) of two-view posteroanterior and lateral with those of four-view posteroanterior, lateral, and right and left obliques screening radiographs. Three sizes (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm, maximum dimension) of beer bottle glass fragments were inserted into chicken legs and radiographed. Three staff radiologists reviewed the films independently. With two-view radiography, the 2.0-, 1.0-, and 0.5-mm glass fragments exhibited 99%, 83%, and 61% average detection rates, respectively. An analysis of variance and a Tukey's range test demonstrated that the variation in the average detection rate with respect to size was statistically significant (P less than .01). X2 Analysis failed to demonstrate a statistically significant (P greater than .05) increase in average detection rates with four-view radiography. The results of this study indicate that the size of the glass foreign body is often the limiting factor for radiographic detection and that 0.5- to 2.0-mm fragments represent a "limited detection" size range. Furthermore, two-view radiography is appropriate and more cost-effective than four-view radiography for screening purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2393187     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82562-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  A model for teaching bedside detection of glass in wounds.

Authors:  Matthew R Levine; Stephen M Gorman; Paul R Yarnold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Sequelae of foreign bodies in the wrist and hand.

Authors:  Vishnu C Potini; Ramces Francisco; Benhoor Shamian; Virak Tan
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-03

3.  [Foreign body retention after soft tissue laceration. A case of insufficient inspection and documentation].

Authors:  L Kempf; K F Braun; J Neu
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Missed foreign bodies in the hand: an experience from a center in Kashmir.

Authors:  Sajad Ahmad Salati; Ajaz Rather
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  A Rare Case of Gastrointestinal Tract Foreign Body; Glassy Stomach.

Authors:  Mohsen Ebrahimi; Jafar Malmir; Azadeh Mahmoudi-Gharaee; Mahdi Foroughian
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-14

6.  Pre-operative Ultrasound Localization for Removal of a Penetrating Foreign Body of Forearm: Technical Note.

Authors:  David Kirby; Daniel Seigerman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.