Literature DB >> 24474394

Population-based screening for Lynch syndrome in Western Australia.

Lyn Schofield1, Fabienne Grieu, Benhur Amanuel, Amerigo Carrello, Dominic Spagnolo, Cathy Kiraly, Nicholas Pachter, Jack Goldblatt, Cameron Platell, Michael Levitt, Colin Stewart, Paul Salama, Hooi Ee, Spiro Raftopoulous, Paul Katris, Tim Threlfall, Edward Edkins, Marina Wallace, Barry Iacopetta.   

Abstract

We showed earlier that routine screening for microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) led to the identification of previously unrecognized cases of Lynch syndrome (LS). We report here the results of screening for LS in Western Australia (WA) during 1994-2012. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for loss of MMR protein expression was performed in routine pathology laboratories, while MSI was detected in a reference molecular pathology laboratory. Information on germline mutations in MMR genes was obtained from the state's single familial cancer registry. Prior to the introduction of routine laboratory-based screening, an average of 2-3 cases of LS were diagnosed each year amongst WA CRC patients. Following the implementation of IHC and/or MSI screening for all younger (<60 years) CRC patients, this has increased to an average of 8 LS cases diagnosed annually. Based on our experience in WA, we propose three key elements for successful population-based screening of LS. First, for all younger CRC patients, reflex IHC testing should be carried out in accredited pathology services with ongoing quality control. Second, a state- or region-wide reference laboratory for MSI testing should be established to confirm abnormal or suspicious IHC test results and to exclude sporadic cases by carrying out BRAF mutation or MLH1 methylation testing. Finally, a state or regional LS coordinator is essential to ensure that all appropriate cases identified by laboratory testing are referred to and attend a Familial Cancer Clinic for follow-up and germline testing.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lynch syndrome; colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474394     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  8 in total

1.  A Pragmatic Testing-Eligibility Framework for Population Mutation Screening: The Example of BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Ana F Best; Margaret A Tucker; Megan N Frone; Mark H Greene; June A Peters; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Screening for Lynch syndrome in young Saudi colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability testing and next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Masood Alqahtani; Caitlin Edwards; Natasha Buzzacott; Karen Carpenter; Khalid Alsaleh; Abdulmalik Alsheikh; Waleed Abozeed; Miral Mashhour; Afnan Almousa; Yousef Housawi; Shareefa Al Hawwaj; Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Lynch syndrome testing of colorectal cancer patients in a high-income country with universal healthcare: a retrospective study of current practice and gaps in seven australian hospitals.

Authors:  Julia Steinberg; Priscilla Chan; Emily Hogden; Gabriella Tiernan; April Morrow; Yoon-Jung Kang; Emily He; Rebecca Venchiarutti; Leanna Titterton; Lucien Sankey; Amy Pearn; Cassandra Nichols; Skye McKay; Anne Hayward; Natasha Egoroff; Alexander Engel; Peter Gibbs; Annabel Goodwin; Marion Harris; James G Kench; Nicholas Pachter; Bonny Parkinson; Peter Pockney; Abiramy Ragunathan; Courtney Smyth; Michael Solomon; Daniel Steffens; James Wei Tatt Toh; Marina Wallace; Karen Canfell; Anthony Gill; Finlay Macrae; Kathy Tucker; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 4.  Deficient mismatch repair: Read all about it (Review).

Authors:  Susan Richman
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-24

6.  Clinicopathological Features and Type of Surgery for Lynch Syndrome: Changes during the Past Two Decades.

Authors:  Il Tae Son; Duck-Woo Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Young-Kyoung Shin; Myong Hoon Ihn; Heung-Kwon Oh; Sung-Bum Kang; Kyu Joo Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Ja-Lok Ku; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification.

Authors:  Alessia Tognetto; Maria Benedetta Michelazzo; Giovanna Elisa Calabró; Brigid Unim; Marco Di Marco; Walter Ricciardi; Roberta Pastorino; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-12

8.  Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.

Authors:  Dayna R Cenin; Steffie K Naber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Mark A Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; David B Preen; Hooi C Ee; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.