Literature DB >> 24473919

Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Janelle M Guirguis-Blake, Tracy L Beil, Caitlyn A Senger, Evelyn P Whitlock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up of population-based randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) measuring 3 cm or greater decreases AAA-related mortality rates in men aged 65 years or older.
PURPOSE: To systematically review evidence about the benefits and harms of ultrasonography screening for AAAs in asymptomatic primary care patients. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2004 through January 2013), clinical trial registries, reference lists, experts, and a targeted bridge search for population-based screening RCTs through September 2013. STUDY SELECTION: English-language, population-based, fair- to good-quality RCTs and large cohort studies for AAA screening benefits as well as RCTs and cohort and registry studies for harms in adults with AAA. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual quality assessment and abstraction of study details and results. DATA SYNTHESIS: Reviews of 4 RCTs involving 137,214 participants demonstrated that 1-time invitation for AAA screening in men aged 65 years or older reduced AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality rates for up to 10 and 15 years, respectively, but had no statistically significant effect on all-cause mortality rates up to 15 years. Screening was associated with more overall and elective surgeries but fewer emergency operations and lower 30-day operative mortality rates at up to 10- to 15-year follow-up. One RCT involving 9342 women showed that screening had no benefit on AAA-related or all-cause mortality rates. LIMITATIONS: Trials included mostly white men outside of the United States. Information for subgroups and about rescreening was limited.
CONCLUSION: One-time invitation for AAA screening in men aged 65 years or older was associated with decreased AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality rates but had little or no effect on all-cause mortality rates. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24473919     DOI: 10.7326/M13-1844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

2.  Association of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with abdominal aortic aneurysm: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Lu Yao; Aaron R Folsom; Alvaro Alonso; Pamela L Lutsey; James S Pankow; Weihua Guan; Susan Cheng; Frank A Lederle; Weihong Tang
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  [Choosing wisely recommendations in angiology].

Authors:  O J Müller; R Sternitzky
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Postoperative imaging of the aorta.

Authors:  Weier Li; Sasiprapa Rongthong; Anand M Prabhakar; Sandeep Hedgire
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

5.  Screening Men with Coronary Heart Disease for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ville Vänni; Jussi Hernesniemi; Matti Turtiainen; Johanna Turtiainen; Tapio Hakala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Vascular disease: Could AAA screening reduce mortality?

Authors:  Alexandra Roberts
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Population based ultrasonographic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Johan H C Reiber; Sasan Partovi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Pari V Pandharipande; Janie M Lee; Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Sex Hormones and Sex Chromosomes Cause Sex Differences in the Development of Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Arthur P Arnold; Lisa A Cassis; Mansoureh Eghbali; Karen Reue; Kathryn Sandberg
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor-β) Signaling Protects the Thoracic and Abdominal Aorta From Angiotensin II-Induced Pathology by Distinct Mechanisms.

Authors:  Stoyan N Angelov; Jie Hong Hu; Hao Wei; Nathan Airhart; Minghui Shi; David A Dichek
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.