Literature DB >> 24471769

Effect of Implant Height Differences on Different Attachment Types and Peri-Implant Bone in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 3D Finite Element Study.

Oguz Ozan1, Serhat Ramoglu1.   

Abstract

Implant-supported overdentures with self-aligning attachment systems are preferred to improve the stability and retention of complete dentures. The positioning of the implant attachments is a very important aspect of two-implant overdentures in obtaining better stress distribution. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare two different attachment systems in a two-implant overdenture by evaluating the stress distributions in peri-implant bone and stresses on the attachments with positioning at different height levels using the 3D FEA method. Six models with ball attachments and 6 models with locator attachments-totaling 12 models (including 2 controls)-with the left implant positioned unilaterally at different height levels were subjected to 3 loading conditions (anterior, right posterior, and left posterior). Data for Von Misses stresses were produced numerically, color coded, and compared among the models for attachments and peri-implant cortical bone. The configurations in which implants presented 3 mm height differences in the bone level showed the most successful results in the peri-implant bone. When stresses on the attachments were compared, greater stress values were obtained from the ball attachments. As a conclusion, the configurations with a considerable (3 mm) height difference between quadrants of the mandible in the anterior segment showed the most successful results in the peri-implant bone. On the contrary, peak stress values around the implant observed from the models with less (1 mm) bone height difference may require leveling of the bone during surgery. However, these findings should be corroborated with clinical studies.

Keywords:  bone resorption; dental implant; denture; finite element analysis; overlay

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24471769     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the biomechanical effects of implant diameter in case of facial trauma to an edentulous atrophic mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Aysa Ayali; Kani Bilginaylar
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study.

Authors:  Angel Alvarez-Arenal; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Elena Martin-Fernandez; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Joseba Ellacuria-Echebarria
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Effects of overdenture attachment systems with different working principles on stress transmission: A three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Nurullah Turker; Ulviye Sebnem Buyukkaplan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Using Different Low-Profile Abutments for Assisting Mandibular Implant Overdenture: A Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Ahmed K Khalifa; Mohammad Mahmoud Alokda; Mohamed Moustafa Said
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-04-09

Review 5.  Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis - A systematic review.

Authors:  Bappaditya Bhattacharjee; Ritu Saneja; Ankita Singh; Pavan Kumar Dubey; Atul Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-07

6.  Rehabilitation of Atrophic Mandible with Ultrashort Implants Combined with Photobiomodulation Therapy: A Split-Mouth Design Study.

Authors:  Sara Mahmoud Zayed; Marwa Gamal Noureldin
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 7.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.