Ralf Schwarzer1, Agata Antoniuk, Maryam Gholami. 1. Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The roles of self-efficacy and self-monitoring as proximal predictors of dental flossing frequency are studied in the context of an oral health intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study among 287 university students, aged 19 to 26 years, compared an intervention group that received a brief self-regulatory treatment, with a passive and an active control group. Dental flossing, self-efficacy, and self-monitoring were assessed at baseline and 3 weeks later. RESULTS: The intervention led to an increase in dental flossing regardless of experimental condition. However, treatment-specific gains were documented for self-efficacy and self-monitoring. Moreover, changes in the latter two served as mediators in a path model, linking the intervention with subsequent dental flossing and yielding significant indirect effects. CONCLUSIONS:Self-efficacy and self-monitoring play a mediating role in facilitating dental flossing. Interventions that aim at an improvement in oral self-care should consider using these constructs. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? The adoption and maintenance of oral self-care can be facilitated by a number of social-cognitive variables. Interventions that include planning, action control, or self-efficacy components have been shown to improve dental flossing. In one recent study on flossing in adolescent girls, planning intervention effects were mediated by self-efficacy. What does this study add? Self-monitoring is associated with better oral self-care. A 10-min intervention improves self-efficacy and self-monitoring. Self-efficacy and self-monitoring operate as mediators between treatment and flossing.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The roles of self-efficacy and self-monitoring as proximal predictors of dental flossing frequency are studied in the context of an oral health intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study among 287 university students, aged 19 to 26 years, compared an intervention group that received a brief self-regulatory treatment, with a passive and an active control group. Dental flossing, self-efficacy, and self-monitoring were assessed at baseline and 3 weeks later. RESULTS: The intervention led to an increase in dental flossing regardless of experimental condition. However, treatment-specific gains were documented for self-efficacy and self-monitoring. Moreover, changes in the latter two served as mediators in a path model, linking the intervention with subsequent dental flossing and yielding significant indirect effects. CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy and self-monitoring play a mediating role in facilitating dental flossing. Interventions that aim at an improvement in oral self-care should consider using these constructs. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? The adoption and maintenance of oral self-care can be facilitated by a number of social-cognitive variables. Interventions that include planning, action control, or self-efficacy components have been shown to improve dental flossing. In one recent study on flossing in adolescent girls, planning intervention effects were mediated by self-efficacy. What does this study add? Self-monitoring is associated with better oral self-care. A 10-min intervention improves self-efficacy and self-monitoring. Self-efficacy and self-monitoring operate as mediators between treatment and flossing.
Authors: Eunjoo An; Michael R Irwin; Lynn V Doering; Mary-Lynn Brecht; Karol E Watson; Elizabeth Corwin; Paul M Macey Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-05
Authors: Jean Schensul; Susan Reisine; Apoorva Salvi; Toan Ha; James Grady; Jianghong Li Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Janneke F M Scheerman; Berno van Meijel; Pepijn van Empelen; Gem J C Kramer; Gijsbert H W Verrips; Amir H Pakpour; Matheus C T Van den Braak; Cor van Loveren Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Katrin M Jaedicke; Susan M Bissett; Tracy Finch; Jared Thornton; Philip M Preshaw Journal: Int J Dent Hyg Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 2.477