| Literature DB >> 24471099 |
Mee-Jung Kim1, Song-Suk Kim2, Sang-Il Lee3.
Abstract
In this study, we designed a method to manufacture elevated fermented green tea by using Monascus pilosus, which is known as a functional microbe, and observe its antioxidant abilities and quality characteristics. The water-soluble substance (WSS) content of the fermented tea by M. pilosus (FTM) was lower than that of the non-fermented tea (NFT), although the alcohol-insoluble substance (AIS) content of the FTM was higher than that of NTM. On the other hand, the fractionated distilled water-soluble polysaccharide (DWSP), CDTA-soluble polysaccharides (CDSP), sodium carbonate-soluble polysaccharide (SCSP) and KOH soluble hemicellulose (HC) obtained from the AIS of the FTM was markedly higher than that of NFT. In the antioxidant parameters, the electron donating ability of all fractions, except HC, extracted from FTM was higher than that of NFT, and iron chelating ability of all fractions, except CDSP, extracted from FTM was higher than that of NFT. Whereas the DWSP and SCSP obtained from the FTM were higher than that of NFT, the activity of the HC fraction from both NFT and the FTM could not be detected. In addition, the xanthin oxidase (XO) inhibitory activities of the DWSP, CDSP and the SCSP obtained from the NFT were significantly higher than that of FTM, the aldehyde oxidase (AO) inhibitory activities of the DWSP and SCSP extracted from the FTM were markedly higher than that of the NFT. Meanwhile, the acceptance of NFT and FTM had no significant difference, while the quality of aroma, taste and mouthfeel of the FTM was higher than that of NFT. These results suggest that the post-fermented tea by Monascus microorgan-isms may be responsible for functional components as well as contribute to the improvement of the tea quality.Entities:
Keywords: Monascus pilosus; color; post-fermented tea; sensory evaluation; tea polysaccharides
Year: 2012 PMID: 24471099 PMCID: PMC3866730 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2012.17.4.293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Fig. 1Preparation procedure of non-fermented tea (NFT) and fermented tea by M. pilosus (FTM).
Color of tea infusions with and without fermentation by M. pilosus
| Plots | Hunter values and hue angle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| L* | a* | b* | H∘ | |
| NFT | 59.03±2.34a | 8.42±1.30b | 25.71±1.41a | 68.93±2.45a |
| FTM | 40.25±2.21b | 26.17±2.28a | 15.17±1.22b | 39.23±2.32b |
See Fig. 1.
Values are mean±SD of triplicate determinations, and different superscripts within a column (a,b) indicate significantly different at p<0.05.
Fig. 2Photographs of 1% tea fusion. Abbreviations: See Fig. 1.
Fig. 3Content of water soluble substance (WSS) (A) and brix degree of tea infusion (B). Abbreviations: See Fig. 1. Values are mean±SD of triplicate determinations, and different superscripts on the bars (a,b) indicate significant differences at p<0.05.
Fig. 4Content of alcohol insoluble solids (AIS) and tea polysaccharides in NFT and FTM. NFT and FTM: See Fig. 1. DWSP: water soluble polysaccharide, CDSP: 0.05 M CDTA-soluble polysaccharides, SCSP: 0.05 M sodium carbonate soluble poly-saccharide, HC: 8 M KOH soluble hemicellulose. Values are mean±SD of triplicate determinations, and different superscripts on the same bars (a-d) and different bars (A,B) indicates significant differences at p<0.05.
Antioxidant related activities of tea polysaccharides
| Teas | DWSP | CDSP | SCSP | HC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electron | NFT | 43.47±1.65aB | 36.51±2.14bB | 30.82±2.25cB | 43.89±2.87aA |
| donating ability (%) | FTM | 49.86±2.08bA | 57.53±3.00aA | 48.58±3.01bA | 9.94±2.40cB |
|
| |||||
| Iron chelating | NFT | 12.36±2.66bB | 86.80±4.71aA | 9.11±2.85NS | 3.44±1.04cB |
| activity (%) | FTM | 21.10±1.95bA | 28.90±2.45aB | 9.85±1.74 | 24.72±2.38aA |
|
| |||||
| SOD-like activity | NFT | 0.69±0.03aB | 0.22±0.02NS | 0.39±0.03bB | 0.00±0.00NS |
| (U) | FTM | 0.88±0.07aA | 0.23±0.02 | 0.71±0.04bA | 0.00±0.00 |
|
| |||||
| XO inhibitory | NFT | 12.09±2.97bA | 2.46±1.88cA | 49.18±2.32aA | 0.00±0.00dB |
| activity (%) | FTM | 0.00±0.00bB | 0.00±0.00bB | 0.00±0.00bB | 19.06±3.12aA |
|
| |||||
| AO inhibitory | NFT | 10.41±1.98bB | 0.00±0.00cB | 7.51±2.58bB | 99.42±4.09aA |
| activity (%) | FTM | 33.53±2.23aA | 19.65±1.45cA | 28.90±1.82bA | 0.00±0.00dB |
NFT and FTM: See Fig. 1.
DWSP, CDSP, SCSP and HC: See Fig. 4.
Values are mean±SD of triplicate determinations, and different superscripts within a rows (a-d), and a column (A,B) indicates significant differences at p<0.05.
Not significant.
Sensory evaluation of tea infusions with and without fermentation by M. pilosus
| Attributes | NFT | FTM |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | 2.63±0.31NS | 2.55±0.37 |
| Aroma | 3.15±0.28b | 4.11±0.34a |
| Taste | 2.84±0.37b | 3.95±0.36a |
| Color | 2.78±0.32b | 4.15±0.37a |
| Brightness | 2.85±0.35b | 4.26±0.41a |
| Mouth feel | 2.88±0.45b | 4.25±0.44a |
All attributes were evaluated from very poor (1 point) to very good (5 points).
See Fig. 1.
Not significant.
Values are mean±SD of 25 panels, and different superscripts within a row (a,b) indicate significantly different at p<0.05.