Literature DB >> 24470551

Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas.

Sofie Van Cauter, Frederik De Keyzer, Diana M Sima, Anca Croitor Sava, Felice D'Arco, Jelle Veraart, Ronald R Peeters, Alexander Leemans, Stefaan Van Gool, Guido Wilms, Philippe Demaerel, Sabine Van Huffel, Stefan Sunaert, Uwe Himmelreich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging (CSI) for grading gliomas.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 35 patients with cerebral gliomas underwent DKI, DSC, and CSI on a 3 T MR scanner. Diffusion parameters were mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis (MK). Perfusion parameters were mean relative regional cerebral blood volume (rrCBV), mean relative regional cerebral blood flow (rrCBF), mean transit time, and relative decrease ratio (rDR). The diffusion and perfusion parameters along with 12 CSI metabolite ratios were compared among 22 high-grade gliomas and 14 low-grade gliomas (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < .05). Classification accuracy was determined with a linear discriminant analysis for each MR modality independently. Furthermore, the performance of a multimodal analysis is reported, using a decision-tree rule combining the statistically significant DKI, DSC-MRI, and CSI parameters with the lowest P-value. The proposed classifiers were validated on a set of subsequently acquired data from 19 clinical patients.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences among tumor grades were shown for MK, MD, mean rrCBV, mean rrCBF, rDR, lipids over total choline, lipids over creatine, sum of myo-inositol, and sum of creatine. DSC-MRI proved to be the modality with the best performance when comparing modalities individually, while the multimodal decision tree proved to be most accurate in predicting tumor grade, with a performance of 86%.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining information from DKI, DSC-MRI, and CSI increases diagnostic accuracy to differentiate low- from high-grade gliomas, possibly providing diagnosis for the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24470551      PMCID: PMC4057134          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  44 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Application of MR Spectroscopy and Imaging of Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Naomi Morita; Masafumi Harada; Hideki Otsuka; Elias R Melhem; Hiromu Nishitani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Exploiting spatial information to estimate metabolite levels in two-dimensional MRSI of heterogeneous brain lesions.

Authors:  Anca R Croitor Sava; Diana M Sima; Jean-Baptiste Poullet; Alan J Wright; Arend Heerschap; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Strengths and weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS data in brain glioma classification.

Authors:  M G Kounelakis; I N Dimou; M E Zervakis; I Tsougos; E Tsolaki; E Kousi; E Kapsalaki; K Theodorou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2011-03-22

Review 4.  MR-visible lipids and the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  E James Delikatny; Sanjeev Chawla; Daniel-Joseph Leung; Harish Poptani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Measurements of diagnostic examination performance and correlation analysis using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in glial tumor grading.

Authors:  Andrés Server; Bjørn A Graff; Tone E Døli Orheim; Till Schellhorn; Roger Josefsen; Øystein B Gadmar; Per H Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Els Fieremans; Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond.

Authors:  Jacques-Donald Tournier; Susumu Mori; Alexander Leemans
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Multimodality assessment of brain tumors and tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Peter Raab; Heinrich Lanfermann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Heterogeneity in malignant gliomas: a magnetic resonance analysis of spatial distribution of metabolite changes and regional blood volume.

Authors:  Marlies Wagner; Reinhold Nafe; Alina Jurcoane; Ulrich Pilatus; Kea Franz; Johannes Rieger; Joachim P Steinbach; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Magalie Viallon; Victor Cuvinciuc; Benedicte Delattre; Laura Merlini; Isabelle Barnaure-Nachbar; Seema Toso-Patel; Minerva Becker; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Sven Haller
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Clinical Imaging for Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Gliomas: A Review.

Authors:  Alipi V Bonm; Reed Ritterbusch; Patrick Throckmorton; Jerome J Graber
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.

Authors:  Xi-Xun Qi; Da-Fa Shi; Si-Xie Ren; Su-Ya Zhang; Long Li; Qing-Chang Li; Li-Ming Guan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas.

Authors:  Rajikha Raja; Neelam Sinha; Jitender Saini; Anita Mahadevan; Kvl Narasinga Rao; Aarthi Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Contribution of susceptibility- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for grading gliomas.

Authors:  Jianxing Xu; Hai Xu; Wei Zhang; Jiangang Zheng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Discrimination between Glioma Grades II and III Using Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion MRI: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anna F Delgado; Alberto F Delgado
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Johann-Martin Hempel; Sotirios Bisdas; Jens Schittenhelm; Cornelia Brendle; Benjamin Bender; Henk Wassmann; Marco Skardelly; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Ulrike Ernemann; Uwe Klose
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Brain Tumor Immunotherapy: What have We Learned so Far?

Authors:  Stefaan Willy Van Gool
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients.

Authors:  Adrian Ion-Margineanu; Sofie Van Cauter; Diana M Sima; Frederik Maes; Stefaan W Van Gool; Stefan Sunaert; Uwe Himmelreich; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Monitoring the Bystander Killing Effect of Human Multipotent Stem Cells for Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Cindy Leten; Jesse Trekker; Tom Struys; Valerie D Roobrouck; Tom Dresselaers; Greetje Vande Velde; Ivo Lambrichts; Catherine M Verfaillie; Uwe Himmelreich
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.