OBJECTIVE: The comparative risk of infection associated with non-anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents is not well established. Our objective was to compare risk for hospitalized infections between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologic agents in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Using 1998-2011 data from the US Veterans Health Administration, we studied RA patients initiating rituximab, abatacept, or anti-TNF therapy. Exposure was based upon days supplied (injections) or usual dosing intervals (infusions). Treatment episodes were defined as new biologic agent use. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for hospitalization for a bacterial infection were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 3,152 unique RA patients contributing 4,158 biologic treatment episodes to rituximab (n = 596), abatacept (n = 451), and anti-TNF agents (n = 3,111), the patient mean age was 60 years and 87% were male. The most common infections were pneumonia (37%), skin/soft tissue (22%), urinary tract (9%), and bacteremia/sepsis (7%). Hospitalized infection rates per 100 person-years were 4.4 (95% CI 3.1-6.4) for rituximab, 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.7) for abatacept, and 3.0 (95% CI 2.5-3.5) for anti-TNF. Compared to etanercept, the adjusted rate of hospitalized infection was not different for adalimumab (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), abatacept (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1), or rituximab (HR 1.4, 0.8-2.6), although it was increased for infliximab (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Infection risk was greater for those taking prednisone >7.5 mg/day (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and in the highest quartile of C-reactive protein (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2) compared to the lowest quartile. CONCLUSION: In older, predominantly male US veterans with RA, the risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with rituximab or abatacept was similar to etanercept.
OBJECTIVE: The comparative risk of infection associated with non-anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents is not well established. Our objective was to compare risk for hospitalized infections between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologic agents in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Using 1998-2011 data from the US Veterans Health Administration, we studied RApatients initiating rituximab, abatacept, or anti-TNF therapy. Exposure was based upon days supplied (injections) or usual dosing intervals (infusions). Treatment episodes were defined as new biologic agent use. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for hospitalization for a bacterial infection were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 3,152 unique RApatients contributing 4,158 biologic treatment episodes to rituximab (n = 596), abatacept (n = 451), and anti-TNF agents (n = 3,111), the patient mean age was 60 years and 87% were male. The most common infections were pneumonia (37%), skin/soft tissue (22%), urinary tract (9%), and bacteremia/sepsis (7%). Hospitalized infection rates per 100 person-years were 4.4 (95% CI 3.1-6.4) for rituximab, 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.7) for abatacept, and 3.0 (95% CI 2.5-3.5) for anti-TNF. Compared to etanercept, the adjusted rate of hospitalized infection was not different for adalimumab (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), abatacept (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1), or rituximab (HR 1.4, 0.8-2.6), although it was increased for infliximab (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Infection risk was greater for those taking prednisone >7.5 mg/day (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and in the highest quartile of C-reactive protein (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2) compared to the lowest quartile. CONCLUSION: In older, predominantly male US veterans with RA, the risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with rituximab or abatacept was similar to etanercept.
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Ari Robicsek; Richard Scranton; Dan Zuckerman; Daniel H Solomon Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Archana Jain; Johan Askling; S Louis Bridges; Loreto Carmona; William Dixon; Axel Finckh; Kimme Hyrich; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Joel Kremer; Joachim Listing; Kaleb Michaud; Ted Mikuls; Nancy Shadick; Daniel H Solomon; Michael E Weinblatt; Fred Wolfe; Angela Zink Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Carlos G Grijalva; Lang Chen; Elizabeth Delzell; John W Baddley; Timothy Beukelman; Kevin L Winthrop; Marie R Griffin; Lisa J Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Nivedita M Patkar; Daniel H Solomon; James D Lewis; Fenglong Xie; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Fenglong Xie; Lang Chen; John W Baddley; Timothy Beukelman; Kenneth G Saag; Claire Spettell; Raechele M McMahan; Joaquim Fernandes; Kevin Winthrop; Elizabeth Delzell Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Valerie P K Nell; Tanja Stamm; Martin Uffmann; Stephan Pflugbeil; Klaus Machold; Josef S Smolen Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: M Schiff; M Keiserman; C Codding; S Songcharoen; A Berman; S Nayiager; C Saldate; T Li; R Aranda; J-C Becker; C Lin; P L N Cornet; M Dougados Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Michael D George; Joshua F Baker; Kevin Winthrop; Evo Alemao; Lang Chen; Sean Connolly; Jesse Y Hsu; Teresa A Simon; Qufei Wu; Fenglong Xie; Shuo Yang; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lauren M F Merlo; Samantha Grabler; James B DuHadaway; Elizabeth Pigott; Kaylend Manley; George C Prendergast; Lisa D Laury-Kleintop; Laura Mandik-Nayak Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 3.969