OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic properties of International Classification of Diseases, Version 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and infection criteria to identify bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a cross-sectional study of RA patients with and without ICD-9 codes for bacterial infections. Sixteen bacterial infection criteria were developed. Diagnostic properties of comprehensive and restrictive sets of ICD-9 codes and the infection criteria were tested against an adjudicated review of medical records. RESULTS: Records on 162 RA patients with and 50 without purported bacterial infections were reviewed. Positive and negative predictive values of ICD-9 codes ranged from 54%-85% and 84%-100%, respectively. Positive predictive values of the medical records based criteria were 84% and 89% for "definite" and "definite or empirically treated" infections, respectively. Positive predictive value of infection criteria increased by 50% as disease prevalence increased using ICD-9 codes to enhance infection likelihood. CONCLUSION: ICD-9 codes alone may misclassify bacterial infections in hospitalized RA patients. Misclassification varies with the specificity of the codes used and strength of evidence required to confirm infections. Combining ICD-9 codes with infection criteria identified infections with greatest accuracy. Novel infection criteria may limit the requirement to review medical records.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic properties of International Classification of Diseases, Version 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and infection criteria to identify bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a cross-sectional study of RApatients with and without ICD-9 codes for bacterial infections. Sixteen bacterial infection criteria were developed. Diagnostic properties of comprehensive and restrictive sets of ICD-9 codes and the infection criteria were tested against an adjudicated review of medical records. RESULTS: Records on 162 RApatients with and 50 without purported bacterial infections were reviewed. Positive and negative predictive values of ICD-9 codes ranged from 54%-85% and 84%-100%, respectively. Positive predictive values of the medical records based criteria were 84% and 89% for "definite" and "definite or empirically treated" infections, respectively. Positive predictive value of infection criteria increased by 50% as disease prevalence increased using ICD-9 codes to enhance infection likelihood. CONCLUSION: ICD-9 codes alone may misclassify bacterial infections in hospitalized RApatients. Misclassification varies with the specificity of the codes used and strength of evidence required to confirm infections. Combining ICD-9 codes with infection criteria identified infections with greatest accuracy. Novel infection criteria may limit the requirement to review medical records.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: J Keane; S Gershon; R P Wise; E Mirabile-Levens; J Kasznica; W D Schwieterman; J N Siegel; M M Braun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-03-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2002-08-09
Authors: Rinaa S Punglia; Anthony V D'Amico; William J Catalona; Kimberly A Roehl; Karen M Kuntz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yuka Kiyota; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jeffrey A Sparks; Alexis A Krumme; William H Shrank; Olga S Matlin; Gregory Brill; Edmund J Pezalla; Niteesh K Choudhry; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Archana Jain; Johan Askling; S Louis Bridges; Loreto Carmona; William Dixon; Axel Finckh; Kimme Hyrich; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Joel Kremer; Joachim Listing; Kaleb Michaud; Ted Mikuls; Nancy Shadick; Daniel H Solomon; Michael E Weinblatt; Fred Wolfe; Angela Zink Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Nam-Kyong Choi; Daniel H Solomon; Theodore N Tsacogianis; Joan E Landon; Hong Ji Song; Seoyoung C Kim Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Candace H Feldman; Francisco M Marty; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Hongshu Guan; Jessica M Franklin; Daniel H Solomon; Karen H Costenbader; Seoyoung C Kim Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Carlos G Grijalva; Lang Chen; Elizabeth Delzell; John W Baddley; Timothy Beukelman; Kevin L Winthrop; Marie R Griffin; Lisa J Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Nivedita M Patkar; Daniel H Solomon; James D Lewis; Fenglong Xie; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Huifeng Yun; Fenglong Xie; Elizabeth Delzell; Lang Chen; Emily B Levitan; James D Lewis; Kenneth G Saag; Timothy Beukelman; Kevin Winthrop; John W Baddley; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Sara G Murray; Gabriela Schmajuk; Laura Trupin; Erica Lawson; Matthew Cascino; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Patricia P Katz; Edward H Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.794