Literature DB >> 24469725

Spheroid formation and invasion capacity are differentially influenced by co-cultures of fibroblast and macrophage cells in breast cancer.

Dorina Rama-Esendagli1, Gunes Esendagli, Guldal Yilmaz, Dicle Guc.   

Abstract

Interactions with stromal components influence the growth, survival, spread, and colonization capacities of tumor cells. Fibroblasts and macrophages which are responsible for the stroma production and maintenance are of the basic elements found in tumor microenvironment. Cellular density and ratio of stromal cells to tumor cells can also have modulatory effects in cancer. Here, the contribution of fibroblast and/or macrophage cells on the malignant behavior of breast cancer cells was modeled in co-culture systems. Co-cultures were established at different cell densities and ratios with 4T1 breast cancer, NIH/3T3 or 3T3-L1 fibroblast, and J774A.1 monocyte/macrophage cell lines. Flow cytometry-based proliferation, 3D growth on alginate matrix, and matrigel invasion assays were performed to determine the change in the malignant assets of tumor cells. The data were also supported by immunocytochemical and morphological analyses. Co-culturing with fibroblasts (especially, NIH/3T3 cells) significantly supported the proliferation, scattering, and invasiveness of 4T1 cells whereas inclusion of macrophages disrupted this positive influence. On the other hand, the invasion capacity of 4T1 cells was not enhanced in the co-cultures with fibroblasts whose motility were inhibited with pertussis toxin pretreatment. Particularly at low-density seeding in 3D cultures, 4T1 cells could form substantially more spheroids than that of in the co-cultures with fibroblasts. Only, increasing the amount of fibroblasts could restore the 3D-growth. Intriguingly, co-existence of macrophage, fibroblast, and tumor cells in 3D cultures provided a convenient stroma sustaining the spheroid formation and growth. In conclusion, fibroblasts can form a favorable environment for tumor cells' spread and motility whereas restricting their 3D-growth capacity. On the other hand, presence of macrophages may disrupt the influence of fibroblasts and enhance the spheroid formation by the tumor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469725     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3144-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  29 in total

Review 1.  Fibroblasts in cancer.

Authors:  Raghu Kalluri; Michael Zeisberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Tumor-associated macrophages and the related myeloid-derived suppressor cells as a paradigm of the diversity of macrophage activation.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Antonio Sica; Paola Allavena; Cecilia Garlanda; Massimo Locati
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Tumor-associated fibroblasts recruit blood monocytes into tumor tissue.

Authors:  Tobias Silzle; Marina Kreutz; Marcus A Dobler; Gero Brockhoff; Ruth Knuechel; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Elucidation of chemerin and chemokine-like receptor-1 function in adipocytes by adenoviral-mediated shRNA knockdown of gene expression.

Authors:  Kerry B Goralski; Christopher J Sinal
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 5.  Revisiting the seed and soil in cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Martin Mendoza; Chand Khanna
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  Molecular signatures suggest a major role for stromal cells in development of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Theresa Casey; Jeffrey Bond; Scott Tighe; Timothy Hunter; Laura Lintault; Osman Patel; Jonathan Eneman; Abigail Crocker; Jeffrey White; Joseph Tessitore; Mary Stanley; Seth Harlow; Donald Weaver; Hyman Muss; Karen Plaut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Monocyte-macrophage differentiation in vitro: modulation by extracellular matrix protein substratum.

Authors:  Shiney Susan Jacob; Padma Shastry; P R Sudhakaran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 8.  The microenvironment in breast cancer progression: biology and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Andrew E Place; Sung Jin Huh; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression.

Authors:  Pengfei Lu; Valerie M Weaver; Zena Werb
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Gene expression analysis of in vitro cocultures to study interactions between breast epithelium and stroma.

Authors:  Patricia Casbas-Hernandez; Jodie M Fleming; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-13
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model.

Authors:  Sritama Nath; Gayathri R Devi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 2.  Liquid-based three-dimensional tumor models for cancer research and drug discovery.

Authors:  Stephanie L Ham; Ramila Joshi; Pradip S Thakuri; Hossein Tavana
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-04-11

3.  Three-dimensional multicellular cell culture for anti-melanoma drug screening: focus on tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Najla Adel Saleh; Michele Patrícia Rode; Jelver Alexander Sierra; Adny Henrique Silva; Juliano Andreoli Miyake; Fabíola Branco Filippin-Monteiro; Tânia Beatriz Creczynski-Pasa
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 4.  Methods for vascularization and perfusion of tissue organoids.

Authors:  Hannah A Strobel; Sarah M Moss; James B Hoying
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.224

5.  Infiltrated pre-adipocytes increase prostate cancer metastasis via modulation of the miR-301a/androgen receptor (AR)/TGF-β1/Smad/MMP9 signals.

Authors:  Hongjun Xie; Lei Li; Guodong Zhu; Qiang Dang; Zhenkun Ma; Dalin He; Luke Chang; Wenbing Song; Hong-Chiang Chang; John J Krolewski; Kent L Nastiuk; Shuyuan Yeh; Chawnshang Chang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 6.  Gender Differences in Adipocyte Metabolism and Liver Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Otto K-W Cheung; Alfred S-L Cheng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Influence of TP53 and CDH1 genes in hepatocellular cancer spheroid formation and culture: a model system to understand cancer cell growth mechanics.

Authors:  Joseph M Pomo; Robert M Taylor; Rama R Gullapalli
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Scaffold-Free Coculture Spheroids of Human Colonic Adenocarcinoma Cells and Normal Colonic Fibroblasts Promote Tumorigenicity in Nude Mice.

Authors:  Jong-Il Park; Jisu Lee; Ju-Lee Kwon; Hong-Bum Park; Su-Yel Lee; Ji-Yeon Kim; Jaekye Sung; Jin Man Kim; Kyu Sang Song; Kyung-Hee Kim
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  The knee joint loose body as a source of viable autologous human chondrocytes.

Authors:  J Melrose
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  Three-dimensional tumor model mimics stromal - breast cancer cells signaling.

Authors:  Stephanie Lemmo Ham; Pradip Shahi Thakuri; Madison Plaster; Jun Li; Kathryn E Luker; Gary D Luker; Hossein Tavana
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.