Literature DB >> 24469242

Cost-efficient assessment of biomechanical exposure in occupational groups, exemplified by posture observation and inclinometry.

Catherine Trask1, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Jens Wahlström, Mikael Forsman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the cost efficiency of observation and inclinometer assessment of trunk and upper-arm inclination in a population of flight baggage handlers, as an illustration of a general procedure for addressing the trade-off between resource consumption and statistical performance in occupational epidemiology.
METHODS: Trunk and upper-arm inclination with respect to the line of gravity were assessed for three days on each of 27 airport baggage handlers using simultaneous inclinometer and video recordings. Labor and equipment costs associated with data collection and processing were tracked throughout. Statistical performance was computed from the variance components within and between workers and bias (with inclinometer assumed to produce "correct" inclination angles). The behavior of the trade-off between cost and efficiency with changed sample size, as well as with changed logistics for data collection and processing, was investigated using simulations.
RESULTS: At similar total costs, time spent at trunk and arm inclination angles >60 ° as well as 90 (th)percentile arm inclination were estimated at higher precision using inclinometers, while median inclination and 90th percentile trunk inclination was determined more precisely using observation. This hierarchy remained when the study was reproduced in another population, while inclinometry was more cost-efficient than observation for all three posture variables in a scenario where data were already collected and only needed to be processed.
CONCLUSIONS: When statistical performance was measured only in terms of precision, inclinometers were more cost-efficient than observation for two out of three posture metrics investigated. Since observations were biased, inclinometers consistently outperformed observation when both bias and precision were included in statistical performance. This general model for assessing cost efficiency may be used for designing exposure assessment strategies with considerations not only of statistical but also cost criteria. The empirical data provide a specific basis for planning assessments of working postures in occupational groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469242     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  8 in total

1.  Physical work exposure matrix for use in the UK Biobank.

Authors:  E L Yanik; M J Stevens; E Clare Harris; K E Walker-Bone; A M Dale; Y Ma; G A Colditz; B A Evanoff
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Occupational kneeling and squatting: development and validation of an assessment method combining measurements and diaries.

Authors:  Dirk M Ditchen; Rolf P Ellegast; Tom Gawliczek; Bernd Hartmann; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Participatory intervention with objectively measured physical risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mikkel Brandt; Pascal Madeleine; Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev; Markus D Jakobsen; Afshin Samani; Emil Sundstrup; Pete Kines; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Sex differences in task distribution and task exposures among Danish house painters: an observational study combining questionnaire data with biomechanical measurements.

Authors:  Thomas Heilskov-Hansen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Gert-Åke Hansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers.

Authors:  Peter Palm; Nidhi Gupta; Mikael Forsman; Jørgen Skotte; Tobias Nordquist; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Incident CTS in a large pooled cohort study: associations obtained by a Job Exposure Matrix versus associations obtained from observed exposures.

Authors:  Ann Marie Dale; Christine C Ekenga; Skye Buckner-Petty; Linda Merlino; Matthew S Thiese; Stephen Bao; Alysha Rose Meyers; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Jay Kapellusch; Ellen A Eisen; Fred Gerr; Kurt T Hegmann; Barbara Silverstein; Arun Garg; David Rempel; Angelique Zeringue; Bradley A Evanoff
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  The CONSTANCES job exposure matrix based on self-reported exposure to physical risk factors: development and evaluation.

Authors:  Alexis Descatha; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff; Marcus Yung; Skye Buckner-Petty; Johan Hviid Andersen; Yves Roquelaure
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  A Wearable Sensor System for Physical Ergonomics Interventions Using Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Carl Mikael Lind; Jose Antonio Diaz-Olivares; Kaj Lindecrantz; Jörgen Eklund
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.