E Widerström-Noga1, F Biering-Sørensen2, T N Bryce3, D D Cardenas4, N B Finnerup5, M P Jensen6, J S Richards7, P J Siddall8. 1. 1] Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Lois Pope Life Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA [2] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. 2. Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Glostrup University Hospital, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. 5. Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 6. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 8. 1] Department of Pain Management, Greenwich Hospital, Hammond Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [2] Sydney Medical School-Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To revise the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) based on new developments in the field and on suggestions from the spinal cord injury (SCI) and pain clinical and research community. SETTING: International. METHODS: The ISCIPBDS working group evaluated suggestions regarding the utility of the ISCIPBDS and made modifications in response to these and to significant developments in the field. The revised ISCIPBDS (version 2.0) was reviewed by members of the Executive Committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Executive and Scientific Committees, the American Spinal Injury Association and American Pain Society Boards and the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain, individual reviewers and societies and the ISCoS Council. RESULTS: The ISCIPBDS (version 2.0) is significantly shortened but still contains clinically relevant core questions concerning SCI-related pain. The revisions include an updated SCI pain classification, omission of three questions regarding temporal pain pattern and three pain interference questions. The remaining three pain interference questions concern perceived interference with activities, mood and sleep for overall pain rather than for individual pain problems and are scored on a 0 to 10 scale.
OBJECTIVES: To revise the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) based on new developments in the field and on suggestions from the spinal cord injury (SCI) and pain clinical and research community. SETTING: International. METHODS: The ISCIPBDS working group evaluated suggestions regarding the utility of the ISCIPBDS and made modifications in response to these and to significant developments in the field. The revised ISCIPBDS (version 2.0) was reviewed by members of the Executive Committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Executive and Scientific Committees, the American Spinal Injury Association and American Pain Society Boards and the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain, individual reviewers and societies and the ISCoS Council. RESULTS: The ISCIPBDS (version 2.0) is significantly shortened but still contains clinically relevant core questions concerning SCI-related pain. The revisions include an updated SCI pain classification, omission of three questions regarding temporal pain pattern and three pain interference questions. The remaining three pain interference questions concern perceived interference with activities, mood and sleep for overall pain rather than for individual pain problems and are scored on a 0 to 10 scale.
Authors: F Biering-Sørensen; S Alai; K Anderson; S Charlifue; Y Chen; M DeVivo; A E Flanders; L Jones; N Kleitman; A Lans; V K Noonan; J Odenkirchen; J Steeves; K Tansey; E Widerström-Noga; L B Jakeman Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: N B Finnerup; M P Jensen; C Norrbrink; K Trok; I L Johannesen; T S Jensen; L Werhagen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: G Landmann; E-C Chang; W Dumat; A Lutz; R Müller; A Scheel-Sailer; K Schwerzmann; N Sigajew; A Ljutow Journal: Schmerz Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: C B Baunsgaard; H S Chhabra; L A Harvey; G Savic; S A Sisto; F Qureshi; G Sachdev; M Saif; R Sharawat; J Yeomans; F Biering-Sørensen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: E Widerström-Noga; F Biering-Sørensen; T N Bryce; D D Cardenas; N B Finnerup; M P Jensen; J S Richards; E J Richardson; P J Siddall Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 2.772