PURPOSE: Preclinical data has demonstrated the potential of simvastatin to overcome cetuximab resistance in KRAS mutant CRC patients. Therefore, we designed a study using simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan for KRAS mutant CRC patients who are refractory to irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II study, patients received 500 mg/m(2) cetuximab, 150-180 mg/m(2) (day 1), and 80 mg simvastatin (once daily, days 1-14, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety. We also analyzed the relationship between the RAS gene expression signature score and treatment response to simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan. RESULTS: Fifty-two KRAS mutant CRC patients were enrolled. The ORR (complete response [CR], 0; partial response [PR], 1) was 1.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], -1.8-5.6). The DCR (CR, 0; PR, 1; stable disease, 33) was 65.4 % (95 % CI, 52.5-78.3). The median PFS and OS from the time of study drug administration were 7·6 months (95 % CI, 4.4-10.8) and 12.8 months (95 % CI, 9.5-16.2), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (28.8 %), neutropenia (13.5 %), and diarrhea (7.7 %). The RAS signature score was significantly correlated with the maximal change in target lesions from baseline (r = 0.57, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan regimen showed promising efficacy and safety in KRAS mutant CRC patients who failed irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The RAS signature may be a novel predictor of treatment response to cetuximab-combined chemotherapy in CRC patients.
PURPOSE: Preclinical data has demonstrated the potential of simvastatin to overcome cetuximab resistance in KRAS mutant CRC patients. Therefore, we designed a study using simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan for KRAS mutant CRC patients who are refractory to irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II study, patients received 500 mg/m(2) cetuximab, 150-180 mg/m(2) (day 1), and 80 mg simvastatin (once daily, days 1-14, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety. We also analyzed the relationship between the RAS gene expression signature score and treatment response to simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan. RESULTS: Fifty-two KRAS mutant CRC patients were enrolled. The ORR (complete response [CR], 0; partial response [PR], 1) was 1.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], -1.8-5.6). The DCR (CR, 0; PR, 1; stable disease, 33) was 65.4 % (95 % CI, 52.5-78.3). The median PFS and OS from the time of study drug administration were 7·6 months (95 % CI, 4.4-10.8) and 12.8 months (95 % CI, 9.5-16.2), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (28.8 %), neutropenia (13.5 %), and diarrhea (7.7 %). The RAS signature score was significantly correlated with the maximal change in target lesions from baseline (r = 0.57, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan regimen showed promising efficacy and safety in KRAS mutant CRC patients who failed irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The RAS signature may be a novel predictor of treatment response to cetuximab-combined chemotherapy in CRC patients.
Authors: Gary K Geiss; Roger E Bumgarner; Brian Birditt; Timothy Dahl; Naeem Dowidar; Dwayne L Dunaway; H Perry Fell; Sean Ferree; Renee D George; Tammy Grogan; Jeffrey J James; Malini Maysuria; Jeffrey D Mitton; Paola Oliveri; Jennifer L Osborn; Tao Peng; Amber L Ratcliffe; Philippa J Webster; Eric H Davidson; Leroy Hood; Krassen Dimitrov Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2008-02-17 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Axel Grothey; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Salvatore Siena; Alfredo Falcone; Marc Ychou; Yves Humblet; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Mineur; Carlo Barone; Antoine Adenis; Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank Cihon; Lisa Cupit; Andrea Wagner; Dirk Laurent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jeeyun Lee; Kyung Hae Jung; Young Suk Park; Joong Bae Ahn; Sang Jun Shin; Seock-Ah Im; Do Youn Oh; Dong Bok Shin; Tae Won Kim; Namsu Lee; Jae Ho Byun; Yong Sang Hong; Joon Oh Park; Se Hoon Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Salvatore Siena; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Julia Balfour; Alberto Bardelli Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sherif M El-Refai; Joshua D Brown; Susanne M Arnold; Esther P Black; Markos Leggas; Jeffery C Talbert Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2017-11
Authors: Seung Tae Kim; Tae Jin Ahn; Eunjin Lee; In-Gu Do; Su Jin Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Suk Hyeong Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Hee Cheol Kim Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Youngjoo Lee; Ki Hyeong Lee; Geon Kook Lee; Soo-Hyun Lee; Kun Young Lim; Jungnam Joo; Yun Jung Go; Jin Soo Lee; Ji-Youn Han Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Pi Chu Liu; Gang Lu; Yi Deng; Cheng Dong Wang; Xian Wei Su; Jing Ye Zhou; Tat Ming Chan; Xiang Hu; Wai Sang Poon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J M Baas; L L Krens; A J ten Tije; F Erdkamp; T van Wezel; H Morreau; H Gelderblom; H J Guchelaar Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 3.850