| Literature DB >> 24465937 |
João Paulo de Castro Marcondes1, Maria Luiza Cotrim Sartor de Oliveira1, Alisson M Gontijo2, João Lauro Viana de Camargo1, Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori1.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most common genitourinary neoplasms in industrialized countries. Multifocality and high recurrence rates are prominent clinical features of this disease and contribute to its high morbidity. Therefore, more sensitive and less invasive techniques could help identify individuals with asymptomatic disease. In this context, we used the micronucleus assay to evaluate whether cytogenetic alterations could be used as biomarkers for monitoring patients with a history of urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC). We determined the frequency of micronucleated urothelial cells (MNC) in exfoliated bladder cells from 105 patients with (n = 52) or without (n = 53) a history of UCC, all of whom tested negative for neoplasia by cytopathological and histopathological analyses. MNC frequencies were increased in patients with a history of UCC (non-smoker and smoker/ex-smoker patients vs non-smoker and smoker/ex-smoker controls; p<0.001), in non-smoker UCC patients (vs non-smoker controls; p<0.01), and in smoker/ex-smoker controls (vs non-smoker controls; p<0.001). Patients with a history of recurrent disease also demonstrated a higher MNC frequency compared to patients with non-recurrent neoplasia. However, logistic regression using smoking habits, age and gender as confounding factors did not confirm MNC frequency as a marker for UCC recurrence. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis (using a pan-centromeric probe) showed that micronuclei (MN) arose mainly from clastogenic events regardless of UCC and/or smoking histories. In conclusion, our results confirm previous indications that subjects with a history of UCC harbor genetically unstable cells in the bladder urothelium. Furthermore, these results support using the micronucleus assay as an important tool for monitoring patients with a history of UCC and tumor recurrence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24465937 PMCID: PMC3899207 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1FISH-stained urothelial cells with probes for all chromosome centromeres (green spots).
a) Urothelial cells counterstained with DAPI, and the red arrow indicates a micronucleus (MN) with no centromeric signal (MNC−). b) Urothelial cells counterstained with DAPI, and the yellow arrow indicates a MN with centromeric signal (MNC+). Photomicrographs were acquired at 1,000× magnification.
General characteristics of the study population.
| Control | UCC | ||||||
| Non-smokers | Smokers/ex-smokers | Total | Non-smokers | Smokers/ex-smokers | Total | ||
|
| 29 (54.7) | 24 (45.3) | 53 | 21 (40.4) | 31 (59.6) | 52 | |
|
|
| 55.2 | 66.7 | 60.4 | 71.4 | 90.3 | 82.7* |
|
| 44.8 | 33.4 | 39.6 | 28.6 | 9.7 | 17.3 | |
|
| 59.2±14.2 | 57.6±13.2 | 58.5±13.6 | 67.2±16.4 | 68.3±10.9 | 67.8±13.3 | |
|
| - | 19±10 | - | - | 26±14 | - | |
|
|
| - | - | - | 38.1 | 48.4 | 44.2 |
|
| - | - | - | 61.9 | 51.6 | 55.8 | |
|
|
| - | - | - | 23.8 | 32.3 | 28.8** |
|
| - | - | - | 76.2 | 67.7 | 71.2 | |
|
|
| - | - | - | 85.7 | 74.2 | 78.8 |
|
| - | - | - | 14.3 | 25.8 | 21.2 | |
|
|
| 19 (65.5) | 19 (79.2) | 38 (71.7) | 18 (85.7) | 17 (54.8) | 35 (67.3) |
|
| 2 (6.9) | 2 (8.3) | 4 (7.5) | 1 (4.8) | 7 (22.6) | 8 (15.4) | |
|
| 2 (6.9) | 2 (8.3) | 4 (7.5) | 0 (0) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (9.6) | |
|
|
| 2 (6.9) | 8 (33.3) | 10 (18.9) | 2 (9.5) | 8 (25.8) | 10 (19.2) |
|
| 6 (20.7) | 7 (29.2) | 13 (24.5) | 8 (38.1) | 6 (19.3) | 14 (26.9) | |
|
| 1 (3.5) | 1 (4.2) | 2 (3.8) | 1 (4.8) | 4 (12.9) | 5 (9.6) | |
UCC, patients with history of urothelial cell carcinoma; 1 No. (%); 2 data are presented as percentages (%); 3 mean ± standard deviation; * p<0.05, compared to female patients; ** p<0.01, compared to non-invasive tumors; p<0.001, compared to non-recurrent tumors; 4 data not available for 7 controls (6 non-smokers and 1 smoker/ex-smoker) and 4 UCC patients (2 non-smokers and 2 smokers/ex-smokers); 5 data not available for 1 smoker/ex-smoker control and 6 UCC patients (2 non-smokers and 4 smokers/ex-smokers).
Urothelial MNC frequency in subjects with and without a history of bladder UCC.
| Groups | Number of subjects | Number of cells analyzed | Number of MNC | ‰ MNC |
|
|
| 53 | 54,804 | 107 | 1.9 | - |
| Non-smokers | 29 | 30,639 | 40 | 1.3 | - |
| Smokers/ex-smokers | 24 | 24,165 | 67 | 2.8a | <0.001a |
|
| 52 | 44,949 | 135 | 3.0b | <0.001b |
| Non-smokers | 21 | 19,052 | 70 | 3.7c,d | <0.05c, <0.001d |
| Smokers/ex-smokers | 31 | 25,897 | 65 | 2.5e,f | <0.01e, >0.05f |
MNC per 1,000 cells; a, smoker/ex-smoker controls vs. non-smoker controls; b, UCC patients (non-smokers + smokers/ex-smokers) vs. controls (non-smokers + smokers/ex-smokers); c, non-smoker UCC patients vs. smoker/ex-smoker UCC patients; d, non-smoker UCC patients vs. non-smoker controls; e, smoker/ex-smoker UCC patients vs. non-smoker controls; f, smoker/ex-smoker UCC patients vs. smoker/ex-smoker controls.
Frequencies of centromere-positive (MNC+) and centromere-negative (MNC−) urothelial MNCs from subjects with and without a history of bladder UCC.
| Groups | Number of subjects | Total number of | |||
| MNC | MNC | MNC+ (%) | MNC− (%) | ||
|
| 16 | 14,783 | 20 | 5 (25) | 15 (75) |
| Non-smokers | 8 | 7,229 | 4 | 1 (25) | 3 (75) |
| Smokers/ex-smokers | 8 | 7,554 | 16* | 4 (25) | 12* (75) |
|
| 21 | 20,150 | 39 | 9 (23.1) | 30** (76.9) |
| Non-smokers | 8 | 8,000 | 12 | 4 (33.3) | 8 (66.6) |
| Smokers/ex-smokers | 13 | 12,150 | 27 | 5 (18.5) | 22** (81.5) |
MNC, micronucleated urothelial cells; *p<0.05, compared to non-smoker controls; **p<0.01, compared to % MNC+ within the UCC group.
Urothelial MNC frequency (Giemsa staining) in subjects with and without a history of UCC stratified according to demographic, histological and clinical variables.
| Variables | Number of subjects | ‰ MNC | |||
| Control | UCC | Control | UCC | ||
|
| male | 32 | 43 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| female | 21 | 9 | 2.2 | 3.8 | |
|
| ≤60 years old (35–60 years) | 29 | 16 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| >60 years old (61–89 years) | 24 | 36** | 1.9 | 3.5* | |
|
| low grade | - | 29 | - | 2.9 |
| high grade | - | 23 | - | 3.2 | |
|
| non-recurrent | - | 11 | - | 1.7 |
| recurrent | - | 41 | - | 3.4 | |
|
| non-invasive | - | 37 | - | 3.1 |
| invasive | - | 15 | - | 2.7 | |
MNC – micronucleated cells per 1000 cells; *p<0.05, compared to UCC patients less than 60 years of age; 2 Logistic regression analysis (considering smoking habit, age and gender as confounding factors) did not show significant difference, p>0.05.