| Literature DB >> 27959887 |
Barbara Pardini1,2, Clara Viberti1,2, Alessio Naccarati1, Alessandra Allione1,2, Marco Oderda3, Rossana Critelli1, Mirko Preto3, Andrea Zijno4, Giuseppina Cucchiarale5, Paolo Gontero3, Paolo Vineis1,6, Carlotta Sacerdote7, Giuseppe Matullo1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) is among the most common malignancies worldwide. The identification of new biomarkers for early BC detection, recurrence/progression is urgently needed. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN) evaluates chromosome damage in cultured human lymphocytes and micronuclei (MN) provide a convenient and reliable index of both chromosome breakage and loss.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27959887 PMCID: PMC5243995 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Baseline characteristics of the BC patients and information at follow up
| 152 | 148 | |
| NMIBC | 136 (89.5) | – |
| MIBC | 16 (10.5) | – |
| Age (years) | ||
| Mean±s.d. | 62.3±7.9 | 62.8±8.7 |
| Range | 40.0–74.1 | 40.3–74.9 |
| Smoking Status | ||
| Never | 21 (13.8) | 24 (16.2) |
| Former | 94 (61.8) | 90 (60.8) |
| Current | 37 (24.4) | 34 (23.0) |
| T stage | ||
| Ta | 84 (55.3) | – |
| T1 | 46 (30.3) | – |
| T2 | 14 (9.2) | – |
| T3 | 1 (0.7) | – |
| T4 | 1 (0.7) | – |
| Tis | 3 (1.9) | – |
| Tx | 3 (1.9) | – |
| Grading (1973) | ||
| G1 | 41 (27.0) | – |
| G2 | 64 (42.1) | – |
| G3 | 47 (30.9) | – |
| Grading (2004) | ||
| Non-high grade | 77 (50.7) | – |
| High grade | 75 (49.3) | – |
| Risk | ||
| Low-risk | 37 (24.4) | – |
| Intermediate Risk | 45 (29.6) | – |
| High-risk | 54 (35.5) | – |
| Muscle invasive | 16 (10.5) | |
| Recurrence | ||
| No | 97 (63.8) | – |
| Yes | 55 (36.2) | – |
| Number of recurrences | ||
| 1 | 35 (63.6) | – |
| 2 | 15 (27.3) | – |
| ⩾3 | 5 (9.1) | – |
| Progression | ||
| No | 146 (96.1) | – |
| Yes | 6 (3.9) | – |
| Therapy | ||
| No | 47 (30.9) | – |
| Yes | 105 (69.1) | – |
| Cystectomy | ||
| No | 125 (82.2) | – |
| Yes | 27 (17.8) | – |
| BC patient DiacriticalGrave status at follow up | ||
| Alive | 128 (84.2) | – |
| Died | 24 (15.8) | |
| Of which for BC | 11 | – |
Abbreviations: BC=bladder cancer; MIBC=muscle-invasive bladder cancer; NMIBC=non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
For reference see: (1) Babjuk ; (2) Cheng ; (3) Montironi and Lopez-Beltran, 2005.
Frequencies of analysed end points by the CBMN assay in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of BC cases and healthy controls
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequencies | 148 | 152 | 136 | 16 | ||||
| MN | Mean±s.d. | 7.73±3.91 | 9.51±4.73 | 9.68±4.77 | 8.06±4.24 | 0.91 | ||
| NPB | Mean±s.d. | 0.88±0.90 | 0.98±1.03 | 0.61 | 0.99±1.03 | 0.55 | 0.88±1.09 | 0.85 |
| NBUD | Mean±s.d. | 3.99±2.44 | 5.06±3.36 | 5.20±3.41 | 3.87±2.69 | 0.65 |
Abbreviations: BC=bladder cancer; MIBC=muscle-invasive bladder cancer; MN=micronuclei; NBUD=nuclear buds; NMIBC=non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; NPB=nucleoplasmic bridge.
Significant results in bold.
Mean frequencies for 1000 binucleated cells.
Wilcoxon Rank sum test.
Figure 1Box plot for comparison of MN and NBUD frequencies in different study groups: MN frequencies in (A) BC cases vs controls and (C) in NMIBC cases vs controls; NBUD frequencies in (B) BC cases vs controls and (D) in NMIBC cases vs controls.
Logistic regression model of analysed end points by the CBMN assay for: (A) BC vs controls; (B) NMIBC vs controls; (C) MIBC vs controls
| MN | |||
| BC | 0.104 | 0.029 | |
| NMIBC | 0.114 | 0.030 | |
| MIBC | 0.011 | 0.069 | 0.87 |
| NPB | |||
| BC | 0.115 | 0.121 | 0.34 |
| NMIBC | 0.130 | 0.125 | 0.30 |
| MIBC | −0.016 | 0.292 | 0.96 |
| NBUD | |||
| BC | 0.132 | 0.043 | |
| NMIBC | 0.148 | 0.045 | |
| MIBC | −0.037 | 0.112 | 0.74 |
Abbreviations: BC=bladder cancer; MIBC=muscle-invasive bladder cancer; MN=micronuclei frequencies; NBUD=nuclear buds frequencies; NMIBC=Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; NPB=nucleoplasmic bridge frequencies; s.e.=standard error.
Significant results in bold.
Adjusted for age and smoking.
Figure 2MN frequencies in NMIBC patients (n=132) according to genotype distribution of selected SNPs in DNA repair genes (Kruskal–Wallis P<0.01).
Figure 3ROC curve analysis for discrimination of NMIBC. Model A investigated the risk reached by adding age and smoking habit; model B included also the SNPs differentially distributed among cases and controls (model A+rs804267+ rs6817959+rs11903456+rs7311151); model C included model B and MN frequencies.