Literature DB >> 24464758

Mechanism of reentry induction by a 9-V battery in rabbit ventricles.

Martin J Bishop1, Rebecca A B Burton, Manish Kalla, Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar, Gernot Plank, Gil Bub, Edward J Vigmond.   

Abstract

Although the application of a 9-V battery to the epicardial surface is a simple method of ventricular fibrillation induction, the fundamental mechanisms underlying this process remain unstudied. We used a combined experimental and modelling approach to understand how the interaction of direct current (DC) from a battery may induce reentrant activity within rabbit ventricles and its dependence on battery application timing and duration. A rabbit ventricular computational model was used to simulate 9-V battery stimulation for different durations at varying onset times during sinus rhythm. Corresponding high-resolution optical mapping measurements were conducted on rabbit hearts with DC stimuli applied via a relay system. DC application to diastolic tissue induced anodal and cathodal make excitations in both simulations and experiments. Subsequently, similar static epicardial virtual electrode patterns were formed that interacted with sinus beats but did not induce reentry. Upon battery release during diastole, break excitations caused single ectopics, similar to application, before sinus rhythm resumed. Reentry induction was possible for short battery applications when break excitations were slowed and forced to take convoluted pathways upon interaction with refractory tissue from prior make excitations or sinus beats. Short-lived reentrant activity could be induced for battery release shortly after a sinus beat for longer battery applications. In conclusion, the application of a 9-V battery to the epicardial surface induces reentry through a complex interaction of break excitations after battery release with prior induced make excitations or sinus beats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bidomain; cardiac modeling; optical mapping; reentry; ventricular fibrillation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464758      PMCID: PMC3962639          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00591.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  27 in total

1.  How epicardial electrodes influence the transmembrane potential during a strong shock.

Authors:  S G Patel; B J Roth
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Computational tools for modeling electrical activity in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Edward J Vigmond; Matt Hughes; G Plank; L Joshua Leon
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 3.  Is heart size a factor in ventricular fibrillation? Or how close are rabbit and human hearts?

Authors:  Alexander V Panfilov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  A rabbit ventricular action potential model replicating cardiac dynamics at rapid heart rates.

Authors:  Aman Mahajan; Yohannes Shiferaw; Daisuke Sato; Ali Baher; Riccardo Olcese; Lai-Hua Xie; Ming-Jim Yang; Peng-Sheng Chen; Juan G Restrepo; Alain Karma; Alan Garfinkel; Zhilin Qu; James N Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Low voltage direct current delivered through unipolar transvenous leads: an alternate method for the induction of ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  D E Euler; T A Whitman; P R Roberts; M J Kallok
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Regional differences in ventricular fibrillation in the open-chest porcine left ventricle.

Authors:  Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar; Jian Huang; Jack M Rogers; Philip L Johnson; Jonathan C Newton; Greg P Walcott; Robert K Justice; Dennis L Rollins; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Effect of remodelling, stretch and ischaemia on ventricular fibrillation frequency and dynamics in a heart failure model.

Authors:  Javier Moreno; Alexey V Zaitsev; Mark Warren; Omer Berenfeld; Jerôme Kalifa; Elena Lucca; Sergey Mironov; Prabal Guha; José Jalife
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Direct current application: easy induction of ventricular fibrillation for the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  P Weismüller; P Richter; L Binner; G Grossmann; W Hemmer; M Höher; M Kochs; V Hombach
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison.

Authors:  Arjun D Sharma; Eric Fain; P Gearoid O'Neill; Anne Skadsen; Roger Damle; Jim Baker; Vinod Chauhan; Meir Mazuz; Terrance Ross; Ziaozheng Zhang
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Organization of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart: experiments and models.

Authors:  K H W J ten Tusscher; A Mourad; M P Nash; R H Clayton; C P Bradley; D J Paterson; R Hren; M Hayward; A V Panfilov; P Taggart
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-12-12

2.  Defibrillate You Later, Alligator: Q10 Scaling and Refractoriness Keeps Alligators from Fibrillation.

Authors:  Conner Herndon; Henry C Astley; Tomasz Owerkowicz; Flavio H Fenton
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-01-27

Review 3.  Images as drivers of progress in cardiac computational modelling.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Ramón Casero; Valentina Carapella; Steve A Niederer; Martin J Bishop; Jürgen E Schneider; Peter Kohl; Vicente Grau
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Protection against ventricular fibrillation via cholinergic receptor stimulation and the generation of nitric oxide.

Authors:  Manish Kalla; Minesh Chotalia; Charles Coughlan; Guoliang Hao; Mark J Crabtree; Jakub Tomek; Gil Bub; David J Paterson; Neil Herring
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Ventricular Endocardial Tissue Geometry Affects Stimulus Threshold and Effective Refractory Period.

Authors:  Adam Connolly; Allen Kelly; Fernando O Campos; Rachel Myles; Godfrey Smith; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.