Literature DB >> 24462803

Study of the reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast.

Haibo Dong1, Yadi Li2, Hui Li2, Bo Wang2, Bin Hu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the imaging quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and application values between reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rFOV DWI) and single-shot echo-planar-imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI DWI) of breast tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 87 cases (75 with normal breast tissue, 12 with mammary cancer), breasts were scanned with SS-EPI DWI and rFOV DWI (b values, 800 s/mm(2)). Image quality and ADC values of breast tissue images were compared between SS-EPI DWI and rFOV DWI.
RESULTS: The average image quality score for the 87 cases was 4.73 in rFOV DWI and 3.62 in SS-EPI DWI. The difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The resolution of rFOV DWI was 2.25 mm × 1.23 mm, which was higher than the resolution of SS-EPI DWI (2.25 mm × 2.25 mm). The mean ADC value of 75 cases with normal breast tissue was 1.696 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by rFOV DWI and 1.832 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by SS-EPI DWI, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The mean ADC value for the 12 cases with breast cancer was 1.065 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by rFOV DWI and 1.192 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by SS-EPI DWI, which was a statistically significant difference (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: rFOV DWI presented images with higher resolution and less distortion than SS-EPI DWI, and this difference may be helpful in disease diagnosis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; High resolution; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24462803     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging of optic nerve and chiasma at 3T.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Junqing Wang; Mingge Li; Xin Lou; Jing Tang; Quangang Xu; Yingkui Zhang; Shihui Wei; Lin Ma
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Distortion correction in diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: Performance assessment of prospective, retrospective, and combined (prospective + retrospective) approaches.

Authors:  Ileana Hancu; Seung-Kyun Lee; Keith Hulsey; Robert Lenkinski; Dominic Holland; Jonathan I Sperl; Ek T Tan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim; Yun-Woo Chang; Bo Da Nam; Eunsun Oh; EunJi Lee; Hwajin Cha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Takashi Ota; Masatoshi Hori; Hiromitsu Onishi; Makoto Sakane; Takahiro Tsuboyama; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Atsushi Nakamoto; Tadashi Kimura; Yoshifumi Narumi; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Repeatability Investigation of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Thyroid Glands.

Authors:  Yonggang Lu; Vaios Hatzoglou; Suchandrima Banerjee; Hilda E Stambuk; Mithat Gonen; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Yousef Mazaheri; Joseph O Deasy; Ashok R Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Reproducibility and feasibility of optic nerve diffusion MRI techniques: single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI), readout-segmented EPI, and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Fanglu Zhou; Qing Li; Xiaohui Zhang; Hongli Ma; Ge Zhang; Silin Du; Lijun Zhang; Thomas Benkert; Zhiwei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.795

7.  Preoperative axillary staging with 3.0-T breast MRI: clinical value of diffusion imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Suvi Rautiainen; Mervi Könönen; Reijo Sironen; Amro Masarwah; Mazen Sudah; Juhana Hakumäki; Ritva Vanninen; Anna Sutela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Nonmuscle-invasive and Muscle-invasive Urinary Bladder Cancer: Image Quality and Clinical Value of Reduced Field-of-view Versus Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging DWI.

Authors:  Yanchun Wang; Zhen Li; Xiaoyan Meng; Xuemei Hu; Yaqi Shen; John Morelli; Hui Lin; Zhongping Zhang; Daoyu Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in borderline breast lesions upgraded and not upgraded at definitive histopathological examination after surgical excision.

Authors:  Corrado Tagliati; Paola Piccinni; Paola Ercolani; Elisabetta Marconi; Barbara Franca Simonetti; Gian Marco Giuseppetti; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.

Authors:  Otso Arponen; Otso Arponent; Mazen Sudah; Amro Masarwah; Mikko Taina; Suvi Rautiainen; Mervi Könönen; Reijo Sironen; Veli-Matti Kosma; Anna Sutela; Juhana Hakumäki; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.