Literature DB >> 24462531

Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Jae-Yoon Chung1, Sung-Kyu Kim2, Sung-Taek Jung1, Keun-Bae Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates has been seen as effective at relieving cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy symptoms. Although it is commonly used, subsequent disc degeneration at levels adjacent to the fusion remains an important problem. However, data on the frequency, impact, and predisposing factors for this pathology are still rare.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, predisposing factors, and impact of radiographic and clinical adjacent-segment pathologies after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates and to analyze the efficacy of this surgical method over the long term, after a minimum follow-up period of 10 years. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Our study was a retrospective analysis of 177 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates, with follow-up periods of at least 10 years (mean 16.2 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic adjacent-segment pathology using plain radiographs and clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates.
METHODS: We defined a new grading system of plain radiographic evidence of degenerative changes in adjacent discs after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates; Grade 0 is considered normal, and Grade V consists the presence of posterior osteophytes and a decrease in disc height to less than 50% of normal. The incidence, predisposing factors, and impact of radiographic and clinical adjacent-segment pathologies were analyzed according to etiologies, number of fused segments, and plate-to-disc distance.
RESULTS: Radiographic and clinical adjacent-segment pathologies were found in 92.1% and 19.2%, respectively, of patients. By etiology, clinical adjacent-segment pathology was observed in 13.5% of patients who had sustained trauma, 12.7% of those with disc herniation, and 33.3% of those with spondylosis. By number of fused segments, clinical adjacent-segment pathology was found in 13.2% of patients who underwent single-level fusion and in 32.1% of those who underwent multilevel fusion surgeries. Patients with a plate-to-disc distance of less than 5 mm, who had spondylosis, or who underwent multilevel fusion had a higher incidence of clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates than other groups did (p<.05). Of all patients, only 6.8% needed follow-up surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that over the long term, at a minimum follow-up point of 10 years, a plate-to-disc distance of less than 5 mm, having spondylosis, and undergoing multilevel fusion were predisposing factors for the occurrence of clinical adjacent-segment pathology. Nevertheless, the incidence of clinical findings of adjacent-segment pathology was much lower than the incidence of radiographic findings. Also, the rate of follow-up surgery was low. Therefore, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates can be considered a safe and effective procedure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent-segment pathology; Cervical vertebrae; Clinical; Follow-up surgery; Long-term follow-up; Plate; Radiography; Spinal fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462531     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  31 in total

1.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Adjacent segment degeneration after intervertebral fusion surgery by means of cervical block vertebrae.

Authors:  Xinlong Ma; Yuren Du; Shuli Wang; Jianxiong Ma; Tao Wang; Mingjie Kuang; Baoyi Ma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Huajing Chen; Peng Cao; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Joost Dejaegher; Joris Walraevens; Johannes van Loon; Frank Van Calenbergh; Philippe Demaerel; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Adjacent segment pathology: natural history or effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A 10-year follow-up radiological multicenter study using an evaluation scale of the ageing spine.

Authors:  Alessandro Pesce; Venceslao Wierzbicki; Emanuele Piccione; Alessandro Frati; Antonino Raco; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-20

6.  Automatic Localization and Brand Detection of Cervical Spine Hardware on Radiographs Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning.

Authors:  Raman Dutt; Dylan Mendonca; Huai Ming Phen; Samuel Broida; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Judy Gichoya; Imon Banerjee; Tim Yoon; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Comparative biomechanical analyses of lower cervical spine post anterior fusion versus intervertebral disc arthroplasty: A geometrically patient-specific poroelastic finite element investigation.

Authors:  Kinda Khalaf; Mohammad Nikkhoo
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.889

8.  Anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monish M Maharaj; Ralph J Mobbs; Jarred Hogan; Dong Fang Zhao; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

9.  Biomechanical Effect of C5 /C6 Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Zhou; Xing Guo; Liang Kang; Rui Zhao; Xiao-Tian Yang; Yi-Bin Fu; Yuan Xue
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Shuangjun He; Zhangzhe Zhou; Xiaofeng Shao; Lijian Zhou; Changhao Zhang; Xinfeng Zhou; Shuhua Wu; Kangwu Chen; Yaowei Wang; Zhonglai Qian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.