Literature DB >> 24462042

Impact of patient selection and study characteristics on signal detection in placebo-controlled trials with antidepressants.

Michele Mancini1, Alan G Wade2, Giulio Perugi3, Alan Lenox-Smith4, Alexander Schacht5.   

Abstract

An increasing rate of antidepressant trials fail due to large placebo responses. This analysis aimed to identify variables influencing signal detection in clinical trials of major depressive disorder. Patient-level data of randomized patients with a duloxetine dose ≥ 60 mg/day were obtained from Lilly. Total scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D) were used as efficacy endpoints. In total, 4661 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. The overall effect size (ES), based on the HAM-D total score at endpoint, between duloxetine and placebo was -0.272. Although no statistically significant interactions were found, the following results for factors influencing ES were seen: a very low ES (-0.157) in patients in the lowest baseline HAM-D category and in patients recruited in the last category of the recruitment period (-0.122). A higher ES in patients recruited in centers with a site-size at but not more than 2.5 times the average site-size for the study (-0.345). Study characteristics that resulted in low signal detection in our database were: <80% study completers, a HAM-D placebo response >5 points, a high variability of placebo response (SD > 7 points HAM-D), >6 post baseline visits per study, and use of an active control drug. Simpler trial designs, more homogeneous and mid-sized study sites, a primary analysis based on a higher cutoff blinded to investigators to avoid the influence of score inflation in mild patients and, if possible, studies without an active control group could lead to a better signal detection of antidepressive efficacy.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duloxetine; Effect size (ES); Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D); Major depressive disorder (MDD); Placebo; Signal detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462042     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  12 in total

1.  Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Jim Faucett; Shirin Khan Schilling; Walter A Brown
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Placebo eff ects in psychiatry: mediators and moderators.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Luana Colloca; Paul Enck
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 27.083

3.  The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: Signal detection and validation.

Authors:  Sarah A Mossman; Marissa J Luft; Heidi K Schroeder; Sara T Varney; David E Fleck; Drew H Barzman; Richard Gilman; Melissa P DelBello; Jeffrey R Strawn
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.567

Review 4.  Age and sex as moderators of the placebo response – an evaluation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses across medicine.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Luana Colloca; Paul Enck
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.140

5.  Treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder with Neuromodulation Therapies: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Flavia Venetucci Gouveia; Benjamin Davidson; Ying Meng; Darryl Christopher Gidyk; Jennifer S Rabin; Enoch Ng; Agessandro Abrahao; Nir Lipsman; Peter Giacobbe; Clement Hamani
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  The Impact of Failed Antidepressant Trials on Outcomes in Children and Adolescents with Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah A Mossman; Jeffrey A Mills; John T Walkup; Jeffrey R Strawn
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.031

7.  From Randomized Controlled Trials of Antidepressant Drugs to the Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Evidence: Methodological Aspects Lead to Discrepant Findings.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Roger S McIntyre; André F Carvalho
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75-225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshinori Watanabe; Yuko Asami; Yoko Hirano; Kazuhiko Kuribayashi; Rio Itamura; Takayuki Imaeda
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Adjunctive pregabalin vs gabapentin for focal seizures: Interpretation of comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Jacqueline French; Paul Glue; Daniel Friedman; Mary Almas; Nandan Yardi; Lloyd Knapp; Verne Pitman; Holly B Posner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Placebo response in pharmacological and dietary supplement trials of autism spectrum disorder (ASD): systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon Siafis; Oğulcan Çıray; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Irene Bighelli; Marc Krause; Alessandro Rodolico; Anna Ceraso; Giacomo Deste; Maximilian Huhn; David Fraguas; Dimitris Mavridis; Tony Charman; Declan G Murphy; Mara Parellada; Celso Arango; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 7.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.