Literature DB >> 24460953

Dissection of additive genetic variability for quantitative traits in chickens using SNP markers.

R Abdollahi-Arpanahi1, A Pakdel, A Nejati-Javaremi, M Moradi Shahrbabak, G Morota, B D Valente, A Kranis, G J M Rosa, D Gianola.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to separate marked additive genetic variability for three quantitative traits in chickens into components associated with classes of minor allele frequency (MAF), individual chromosomes and marker density using the genomewide complex trait analysis (GCTA) approach. Data were from 1351 chickens measured for body weight (BW), ultrasound of breast muscle (BM) and hen house egg production (HHP), each bird with 354 364 SNP genotypes. Estimates of variance components show that SNPs on commercially available genotyping chips marked a large amount of genetic variability for all three traits. The estimated proportion of total variation tagged by all autosomal SNPs was 0.30 (SE 0.04) for BW, 0.33 (SE 0.04) for BM, and 0.19 (SE 0.05) for HHP. We found that a substantial proportion of this variation was explained by low frequency variants (MAF <0.20) for BW and BM, and variants with MAF 0.10-0.30 for HHP. The marked genetic variance explained by each chromosome was linearly related to its length (R(2) = 0.60) for BW and BM. However, for HHP, there was no linear relationship between estimates of variance and length of the chromosome (R(2) = 0.01). Our results suggest that the contribution of SNPs to marked additive genetic variability is dependent on the allele frequency spectrum. For the sample of birds analysed, it was found that increasing marker density beyond 100K SNPs did not capture additional additive genetic variance.
© 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic relationships; genomic variance; marker density; minor allele frequency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24460953     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  12 in total

1.  Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome-wide association study dissects genetic architecture underlying longitudinal egg weights in chickens.

Authors:  Guoqiang Yi; Manman Shen; Jingwei Yuan; Congjiao Sun; Zhongyi Duan; Liang Qu; Taocun Dou; Meng Ma; Jian Lu; Jun Guo; Sirui Chen; Lujiang Qu; Kehua Wang; Ning Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits in chickens using genomic annotation.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi; Andreas Kranis; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.

Authors:  Marcos S Lopes; John W M Bastiaansen; Luc Janss; Egbert F Knol; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Decomposing Additive Genetic Variance Revealed Novel Insights into Trait Evolution in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat.

Authors:  Abdulqader Jighly; Reem Joukhadar; Sukhwinder Singh; Francis C Ogbonnaya
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Estimates of genomic heritability and genome-wide association study for fatty acids profile in Santa Inês sheep.

Authors:  G A Rovadoscki; S F N Pertile; A B Alvarenga; A S M Cesar; F Pértille; J Petrini; V Franzo; W V B Soares; G Morota; M L Spangler; L F B Pinto; G G P Carvalho; D P D Lanna; L L Coutinho; G B Mourão
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Deciphering the mode of action and position of genetic variants impacting on egg number in broiler breeders.

Authors:  Eirini Tarsani; Andreas Kranis; Gerasimos Maniatis; Santiago Avendano; Ariadne L Hager-Theodorides; Antonios Kominakis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  A multiple-phenotype imputation method for genetic studies.

Authors:  Andrew Dahl; Valentina Iotchkova; Amelie Baud; Åsa Johansson; Ulf Gyllensten; Nicole Soranzo; Richard Mott; Andreas Kranis; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Uemoto; Shinji Sasaki; Takatoshi Kojima; Yoshikazu Sugimoto; Toshio Watanabe
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi; Gota Morota; Bruno D Valente; Andreas Kranis; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.